Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 1487  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
DENTAL SCIENCE - REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 414-416  

Pre-prosthetic surgery: Mandible


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Vivekanandha Dental College, Thiruchengode, India
2 Department of Periodontics, Vivekanandha Dental College, Thiruchengode, India
3 Department of Oral Surgery, Vivekanandha Dental College, Thiruchengode, India

Date of Submission01-Dec-2011
Date of Decision02-Jan-2012
Date of Acceptance26-Jan-2012
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2012

Correspondence Address:
Veeramalai Naidu Devaki
Department of Prosthodontics, Vivekanandha Dental College, Thiruchengode
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.100312

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Pre-prosthetic surgery is that part of oral and maxillofacial surgery which restores oral function and facial form. This is concerned with surgical modification of the alveolar process and its surrounding structures to enable the fabrication of a well-fitting, comfortable, and esthetic dental prosthesis. The ultimate goal of pre-prosthetic surgery is to prepare a mouth to receive a dental prosthesis by redesigning and smoothening bony edges.

Keywords: Alveolectomy, alveoloplasty, denture retention, pre-prosthetic surgery, undercuts


How to cite this article:
Devaki VN, Balu K, Ramesh SB, Arvind RJ, Venkatesan. Pre-prosthetic surgery: Mandible. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2012;4, Suppl S2:414-6

How to cite this URL:
Devaki VN, Balu K, Ramesh SB, Arvind RJ, Venkatesan. Pre-prosthetic surgery: Mandible. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Oct 22];4, Suppl S2:414-6. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2012/4/6/414/100312

Pre-prosthetic surgery is done to provide a better anatomic environment and to create proper supporting structures for denture construction. [1] Ultimate goal should be rehabilitation of the patient with restoration of the best possible masticatory function, combined with restoration or improvement of dental and facial esthetics. To achieve this goal, maximum preservation of hard and soft tissues of the denture base is of utmost importance. Wearing dentures for prolonged period manifests adverse changes in the denture-bearing areas due to change in the size of the jaw bones resulting in ill-fitting and painful dentures. [2],[3]

Since the end of World War II, through the development of better materials, improved accuracy of processing techniques, and better understanding of oral physiology, dental prosthesis has made great strides in increasing the successful use of prosthetic appliances in edentulous patients. The pattern of bone loss differs in maxilla from mandible. In maxilla, the usual resorption is on the buccal and inferior portion of the alveolar ridge. The pattern of edentulous bone loss results in upward and inward loss of structures. In the anterior maxilla, there is less horizontal bone loss and posterior drift of anterior rest is seen more than in edentulous mandible. In the posterior maxilla, there is invented drift of posterior rest. The width of maxilla is reduced.


   Pattern of Resorption - Mandible Top


The mandible resorbs downward and outward, causing rapid flattening of ridge with greatest loss occurring within 12-18 months after extraction.

Gross anatomic studies [4],[5] of dried jaw bones have shown a wide variety of shapes and sizes of residual ridges. In order to provide a simplified method for categorizing, the most common residual ridge form has been described [5] : Order I, pre-extraction; Order II, post-extraction; Order III, high, well-rounded; Order IV, knife edge; Order V, low, well-rounded; and Order VI, depressed. This self-descriptive system is useful clinically as well as for research purposes and helps one to differentiate the various stages of residual ridge resorption in the individual patient.

Pre-prosthetic surgery is an integral part of oral and maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics. It comprises both basic procedures and sophisticated techniques of reconstructions and rehabilitation of oral and maxillofacial region. The treatment planning, therefore, should involve coordination between the prosthodontist and oral maxillofacial surgeon. As the goal of the prosthetic appliance construction is to improve functions and esthetics, the requirements to achieve these goals should be discussed by the team members. Good shell had recommended the following criteria for a healthy and edentulous ridge: [6]

  1. The bony ridge should have adequate width and height and should be U-shaped for a denture to be retentive and efficient.
  2. The oral mucosa should have adequate uniform thickness.
  3. The ridge should not have any undercut (or) sharp ridges.
  4. No bony (or) soft tissue protuberance should be present.
  5. Should have adequate buccal and lingual sulci depth.

   Objective of Pre-prosthodontic Procedure Top


Correcting conditions that preclude optimal prosthetic function

  1. Hyperplastic replacement of resorbed ridges
  2. Unfavorably located frenular attachments
  3. Bony prominences, undercuts
Enlargement of denture bearing areas

  1. Vestibuloplasty
  2. Ridge augmentation
Placement of tooth root analogues by means of implants

Treatment Plan

The prognathic patient frequently places considerable stress and unfavorable leverages on maxillary basal seat. This may cause extensive reduction of maxillary residual ridge. A mandibular osteotomy of these cases can create a more favorable arch alignment and improve cosmetics as well.


   Alveoloplasty Top


The bony prominences are removed by means of alveolectomy and alveloplasty. Alveoloplasty is the term used to describe the trimming and removal of the labiobuccal alveolar bone along with some interdental and interradicular bone and is carried out at the time of extraction of teeth and after extraction of teeth.

When surgery is planned on the edentulous ridge, incision should be made on the crest of alveolar ridge; usually the envelope flap would suffice, but releasing incision can be made on the labial side to provide broad base to the flap. Bony contouring is accomplished with bone files, rongeurs, or burs. Digital palpation can be used to determine the uniformity of the ridge. If bone resorption in the mandible has been extreme, the mental foramen may open directly at the crest of the residual bony process. This causes the margins of the mental foramen to extend and have very sharp edges. Pressure from the denture against the mental nerve will cause pain. If, however, constant irritation develops as a result of soft tissue being pinched between the denture and the bone, the spicules and the knife-edged ridge most be reduced.


   Removal of Sharp Ridge (or) Knife Edge Ridge Top


Bony prominences, undercuts, and spiny ridges [5],[6] are usually removed to avoid undercuts and to make possible a border seal beyond them against the floor of the mouth.

A sharp knife edge like edentulous ridge causes great denture irritation. It is usually found in the anterior part of mandible.

Place an incision on the crest of the ridge and elevate the mucoperiosteum as minimally as possible in order to maintain the vestiblular depth. Irregular and sharp bony edges are trimmed to a depth of 1-2 mm with the help of rongeurs, bone files, or burs, and the wound is closed with silk sutures.


   Reduction of Genial Tubercle Top


The genial tubercles are extremely prominent as a result of advanced ridge reduction in the anterior part of the body of mandible. If the activity of the genioglossus muscle has a tendency to displace the lower denture, the genial tubercle is removed and the genioglossus muscle detached.

Genial tubercles are the bony projections located on the lingual aspect of the mandible, two on either side of the midline, which gives attachment to the genial muscles. The two genial tubercles located superiorly are more prominent than the inferior ones due to the gross resorption of the mandibular ridge. This may elevate the ridge lingually, giving a shelf-like appearance and making the anterior lingual seal impossible. Genial tubercles are exposed by blunt dissection. Using bur, chisel, or rongeurs, the tubercle is removed, and the rough bony margins are smoothened using file.


   Ridge extension procedure Top


Vestibuloplasty [7],[8],[9] is a surgical procedure wherein oral vestibule is deepened by changing the soft tissue attachments. Vestibuloplasty can be done either on the labial or on the lingual side.

Kazanjian's technique

An incision is made in the mucosa of the lip and a large flap of labial and vestibular mucosa is retracted. The mentalis muscle is detached from the periosteum to the required depth and the vestibule is deepened by supraperiosteal dissection. A flap of the mucosa is turned downward from the attachment of the alveolar ridge and is placed directly against the periosteum to which it is sutured. A rubber catheter stent can be placed in the deepened sulcus and secured with percutaneous sutures. This catheter helps to hold the flap in its new position and maintains the depth of the vestibule. It is removed after 7 days. The labial donor site is coated with tincture of benzoin compound, and the surface heals by granulation and secondary epithelialization. Contracture of the wound margins take place.


   Ridge Augmentation Top


Superior border augmentation

It was described by Davis [10],[11],[12] in the year 1970. This procedure is indicated when mental foramen is situated in the superior border. In this procedure, autogenous bone graft is used. The rib graft can be fixed to the superior border of the mandible. Two segments of the rib, about 15 cm long, are obtained from the 5 th and 9 th ribs. The rib is contoured by vertical scoring in the inner surface. The second rib is cut into small pieces to laterpack against the solid rib. Fixation is done by means of transosseous wiring or circumferential wiring.

Disadvantage

  1. Morbidity of the donor site
  2. Secondary surgical site
  3. Necessity of the patient to withdraw denture till the surgical wound heals for period of 6-8 months
Inferior border augmentation - Visor osteotomy

This technique was first described by Sanders and Cox in the year 1986 for reconstruction of a resected mandible. This procedure is indicated to prevent and manage fractures of an atrophic mandible. [13],[14]

Visor osteotomy was described by Harle to overcome the resorption of free onlay bone graft. This technique is followed where the muscle insertion to the mandible and nutrient supply is maintained. In this procedure, mandible is divided buccolingually by a vertical osteotomy from external oblique ridge of one side of the mandible to the other side. The osteotomized lingual segment is pushed superiorly and fixed with the buccal segment using stainless steel wire in the lower border of the lingual segment.

 
   References Top

1.Taylor RL. A Chronological review of the changing concepts related to modifications, treatment, preservation, and augmentation of the complete denture basal seat. August Prosthodont Soc Bull 1986;16:17-39.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Hopkins R. A colour atlas of preprosthetic oral surgery. London: Wolfe Medical Publications; 1987. p. 136-43.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Lytle RB. Complete denture construction based on a study of deformation of the underlying soft tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1959;9:539-51.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Mercier P, Lafontant R. Residual alveolar ridge atrophy: classification and influence of facial morphology. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:90-100.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Wowern N. Bone mineral contents of mandibles: Normal reference values-rate of age-related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;43:193-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Harrison A. Temporary lining materials. A review of their uses. Br Dent J 1981;151:419-22.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.HIllerup S. Preprosthetic Mandibular vestibuloplasty with split-skin graft: A two-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1987;16:270-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Hillerup S. Hjørting-Hansen E, Eriksen E, Solow B. Influence Mandibular vestibuloplasty. A 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;19:212-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Hjørting-Hansen E, Adawy AM, Hilerup S. Mandibular vestibulolingualsulcoplasty with free skin graft: A five-year clinical follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:173-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Møller JF, Jolst O. A hostologic follow-up study of free autogenous skin grafts to the alveolar ridge in humans. Int J Oral Surg 1972;1:283.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Bays RA. The pathophysiology and anatomy of edentulous bone loss. In: Fonseca R, Davis W, editors: Reconstruction pre-prosthetic oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelph ia: WB Saunders;1985.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Weintraub JA, Burt BA. Oral health status in the united states: Tooth loss and edentulism. J Dent Educ 1985;49:368-78.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Quayle AA. The atrophic mandible: aspects of technique in lower labial sulcoplasty. Br J Oral Surg 1979;16:169-78.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: mixed longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32.  Back to cited text no. 14
    



This article has been cited by
1 A comparison study on the design of mirror and anatomy reconstruction technique in maxillofacial region
Khaja Moiduddin,Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari,Emad S. Abouel Nasr,Syed Hammad Mian,Mohammed Al Kindi
Technology and Health Care. 2016; 24(3): 377
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Establishment of a 3D-dynamic osteoblasts–osteoclasts co-culture model to simulate the jawbone microenvironment in vitro
Letizia Penolazzi,Andrea Lolli,Luca Sardelli,Marco Angelozzi,Elisabetta Lambertini,Leonardo Trombelli,Francesca Ciarpella,Francesca RenataVecchiatini,Roberta Piva
Life Sciences. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Pattern of Resor...
    Objective of Pre...
   Alveoloplasty
    Removal of Sharp...
    Reduction of Gen...
    Ridge extension ...
   Ridge Augmentation
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2429    
    Printed107    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded117    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal