|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 2-9
Clinical research regulation in India-history, development, initiatives, challenges and controversies: Still long way to go
Mohammed Imran1, Abul K Najmi2, Mohammad F Rashid3, Shams Tabrez4, Mushtaq A Shah5
1 Department of Pharmacology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Allied health Sciences, Clinical Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Physiology, Jamia Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
5 Department of Pharmacology, S G T Medical College, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
|Date of Submission||25-Jul-2012|
|Date of Decision||04-Sep-2012|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Sep-2012|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Jan-2013|
Department of Pharmacology, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation and its chairman Drug Controller general of India are bequeathed to protect the citizens from the marketing of unsafe medication. The startling findings, of the 59 th report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare, have uncovered the lax standards followed by the regulatory authorities in India. The growing clinical research after the product patents rights for the pharmaceutical industries as per the trade related aspects of intellectual property rights agreement and adverse drug reaction monitoring of the marketed drugs have raised many ethical and regulatory issues regarding the promotion of new drugs in Indian markets. Many controversial group of medicines; unauthorised and irrational FDCs not relevant to India's medical needs, are available which are not sold in any of the countries with matured regulatory bodies. It becomes vital to understand the history, growth and evolution of the regulatory aspects of drugs which are handled by multiple Ministries and Departments of the Government of India. Although amendment to Schedule Y, registration of Contract Research Organisations, registration of Clinical Trials, Speeding up review process, Pharmacovigilance (PhV) programme for India and Inspection of clinical trial sites have been started by the various regulatory agencies. However due to casual approach in marketing approval for sale of the drugs, the unethical steps taken by some pharmaceutical companies and medical practitioners has reiterated the need to get appropriate understanding of present regulation of drugs and clinical research especially regarding the practical rules and regulations.
Keywords: CDSCO, clinical research, drug and cosmetic act, drug and cosmetic rule, drug regulation
|How to cite this article:|
Imran M, Najmi AK, Rashid MF, Tabrez S, Shah MA. Clinical research regulation in India-history, development, initiatives, challenges and controversies: Still long way to go. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2013;5:2-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Imran M, Najmi AK, Rashid MF, Tabrez S, Shah MA. Clinical research regulation in India-history, development, initiatives, challenges and controversies: Still long way to go. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 21];5:2-9. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2013/5/1/2/106553
Fight with the disease is ever evolving frontier for human beings. Discovery of new drugs and devices through clinical research are the armamentarium to help fight with affliction of mankind.  Because of this sustained demand to develop a new therapeutic agent, biomedical research is conducted to enable discovery of more effective and safer medication and discovery of new therapeutic uses of already established drugs.  Thus clinical trials are important link between pre-clinical discovery of a new lead and their use.
Of late, there is growing interest towards Indian Pharmaceutical Industry in outsourcing pre-clinical and clinical bio-medical research from abroad.  And almost 70% of the total cost of a developing molecule as a drug is due to the clinical research.  Developing countries like India have become the preferred avenues for clinical trials related activities almost 20-30% of the activities of the global share. ,, It is forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 30%. , A recent report from the Indian Government's Planning Commission found that the country needs between 30,000 and 50,000 additional research personnel including investigators, auditors and staff qualified to serve on ethics committees and data safety management boards. 
There are many reasons for this inclination such as; nearly half of the operational cost, low per-patient trial cost; large no. of well trained, qualified, English speaking professionals; large pool of patients; diverse ethnic subjects; wide variation of disease and numerous government medical colleges, institutions and laboratories having state of the art facility, good communications with information technology and above all easy and fast recruitment of large no. of patients in clinical trials. ,,,,, However this trend is leading to more cases of inadequate Informed Consent and unethical treatment of human subjects.  Pre-clinical and Clinical studies are thus monitored under strict government regulation in most of the countries in accordance with the International and local ethical and regulatory guidelines. ,,
| History of Drug Regulation in India|| |
Every government has the responsibility to provide access to the safe, effective and quality medication to its people. Therefore it enacts specific laws to regulate every aspect of the drugs i.e., manufacture, sale, distribution, import and clinical research in humans.  These regulatory measures are dynamic and ever evolving in consonance with the developing technologies. In India, there is broadening of regulation, Since independence, from mere manufacture and sale to newer aspects like import, clinical research and adverse drug reaction monitoring.  Indian drug regulatory system has been built on the basis of principles enshrined in documents of ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals [Table 1]. 
Quite evolved, though, history of drug Regulation dates back to the British Rule in India when majority of the drugs were imported from abroad. In early decade of 20 th century, many unscrupulous foreign manufacturers flooded the Indian market with spurious and adulterated drugs. In response to widespread 'Gigantic Quinine Fraud'; the Government, then, formed a Drug inquiry committee under Sir Ram Nath Chopra also known as 'Chopra Committee' whose recommendations later on tabled amidst growing protest in legislative assembly as 'The Drug Bill' later on amended to the Drugs and Cosmetic Act 1940 (D and C Act) and Drugs and Cosmetic rules of 1945.  This would be the central legislation that regulates India's drug and cosmetic import, manufacture, distribution and sale. This also established the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), and the office of its controller, the Drugs Controller General (India) (DCG(I)).  The CDSCO in the Directorate General of Health services, is a division in Ministry of Health and Family welfare, Government of India, headed by Drug Controller General of India (DCGI). It has four zonal, three sub-zonal and seven port/airport offices and six laboratories to carry out its activities. 
The Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 came into force from 1 st April 1947. Later on, government, in 1962, extended the regulatory provisions to the cosmetics, and finally the Act came to known as Drugs and Cosmetic Act 1940. Drugs and Cosmetic Act has been divided in Chapters, Rules and Schedules and is amended from time to time to control the safety, efficacy and quality of the drugs. It is an act to regulate the import, manufacture, distribution and sale of the drugs and cosmetics. Manufacture and sale is under the respective states governments and union territories through their respective drug control organization, whereas setting standard, import, marketing authorization and monitoring of adverse drug reactions of a new drug is under Central Government. 
Under Chapter Two of this Act, one statutory board and a committee have been framed called Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB) and Drug Consultative Committee (DCC) separately for Modern Scientific System of Medicine and Indian traditional system of Medicine and a provision of Central Drug Laboratory at Central Research Institute, Kasauli for testing drugs has been made in this act. DTAB comprises of technical experts who advises central and state governments on technical matters of Drug regulation. Amendment, if any, to Drug and Cosmetic are made after consulting this board. Drug Consultative Committee, which has central and state Drug Control officials as its members, ensures drug control measures in all over India. It is an advisory body for the Central Government, the State Government and DTAB. 
Later on, after the recommendations of Justice Rajagopala Ayyanger Committee report (1958) , came the era of Process Patent when India followed the socialist-inspired policies. Most industry did not flourish except the generics industry. The Indian Patents Act of 1970 originally had provisions for 'process' patents only.  It included product patents for non-chemical substances and process patent for chemical substances including pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals and food products.  Here is how it was done: Indian companies were able to copy still-patented drugs by slightly altering a process of production resulting in booming India's generic market. Resultantly, western firms had apprehension in introducing their new innovative products in Indian markets.
In 1994, Government signed the agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Properties (TRIPS) to provide minimum protection to the Intellectual Property by the member states of World Trade Organization (WTO).  India amended the Patent (Amendment) Bill before 2005 and extended its weak process patent to strong TRIPS competent 'Product' patent system for pharmaceutical products. ,,
The Indian government, realizing the potential of clinical research for new therapies, has modified and amended Schedule Y to the Drug and Cosmetics Rules of 1945. Schedule Y  establishes a set of guidelines and requirements for clinical trials. However, Schedule Y was written with the generics industry in mind but increase entry of foreign pharmaceutical companies after the introduction of strict patent rules in the area of clinical research led the government to introduce many changes. The government recognized the importance of their regulation and thus developed Ethical and Regulatory Guidelines. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) issued the Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Subjects in 2000  and CDSCO released Indian Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines in 2001. 
Without a regulatory requirement for GCP compliance, however, most companies did not invest in clinical trials. Low quality data resulted in worsening India's reputation. Also, India's strict bureaucratic system made it hard to manage simple tasks like getting customs clearance for the equipment's. There were regulations which resulted in a phase lag, allowing companies to conduct a Phase II trial in India only if a Phase III study was going on somewhere else.  But in 2005, CDSCO made drastic revisions to Schedule Y to try to bring it on at par with internationally accepted definitions and procedures. The changes which took place were
And then, application of Product patent in 2005, recognizing individual's innovations through the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) agreement, which India had signed in 1995, became effective. Indian companies began to respect Intellectual Property rights, consistent with international standards. 
- Definitions for Phase I-IV trials, which eliminated the Phase lag. 
- Clear responsibilities for investigators; and sponsors.
- Requirements for notifying changes in protocol.
With the increasing faith in the system, companies flooded the market and more global trials came. Lately, to decrease the review time of application from 16 weeks to 10 weeks the CDSCO has introduced the fast tracking of clinical trials in 2006.  The DCG (I) created two categories of applications; , Category: (A) Those also being conducted in countries with competent, mature regulatory systems, and Category: (B) Everything else.
Trials that fell into category A (received approval in the U.S., Britain, Canada, Germany, South Africa, Switzerland, Australia, Japan and countries in the European Medicines Agency (EMEA)) would be eligible for fast tracking in India, with approval taking no more than two to four weeks. Trials in category B would fall under more scrutiny; with approval taking 12 weeks once an application is considered under Category B, it, in any case, cannot be shifted to Category A. Nearly all global trials are in the Category A.
The Indian Government gave another boost to the drug-development industry by canceling the 12 percent service tax on clinical trials in 2007.  In February 2009, the industry applauded new regulations on exporting samples. Previously, an export license was needed to get samples out of India but it has been removed now saving the time.
| Current Drug Regulatory Procedures|| |
A comprehensive understanding of regulatory issues is paramount due to dynamic changes at national and international levels, especially with reference to ongoing changes in Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP),  Good Clinical Practices (GCP),  Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)  and Good Clinical Laboratory Practices (GCLP).  Sometimes a word 'current' is used as prefix to depict the dynamic nature of these guidelines. It is the responsibility of regulatory bodies in India to ensure a quality drug supply, their monitoring in the market and maintaining rights, safety and well-being of the clinical trials participants. Towards this end, there are multiple regulatory bodies entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring production, pre-clinical, clinical trials and marketing of the drugs including pricing.
The Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) under Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoH and FW) prescribes standards for ensuring safety, efficacy and quality of drugs, cosmetics, diagnostics and devices in India. It also regulates the market authorization of new drugs and clinical trials standards; supervises drug imports and approves license to manufacture.  The Department of Chemical and Petrochemicals of Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers through National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA)  sets or revise the prices of drugs; maintains data on production, exports and imports; and enforces and monitors the availability of medicines and also gives opinions to parliament on the related issues. It also ensures administration of Drug Policy, 1986 (updated in 2002);  Drug (Price Control) Order, 1995  and Pharmaceutical Policy, 2002. 
There are two main ministries which regulate the drugs in India; the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare  concerned with public health and the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers  on Industrial policy. Other ministries, though indirect, also have a role in regulation process; Ministry of Environment and Forests,  Ministry of Finance,  Ministry of Commerce and Industry  and the Ministry of Science and Technology.  Regulation of Patents, drug exports is governed by Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion  and Directorate General of Foreign Trade under the aegis of Ministry of Commerce and Industry  and the Ministry of Chemical and Fertilizers  respectively. Licensing and quality control and distribution maintained by CDSCO, MoH and FW, Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology (DST) and Department of Environment and Forests especially after the decline of vulture population.
Apart from these there are other Statutes and ministries [Table 2] and [Table 3] that regulate the various aspects of drugs such as; the poison Act, 1919;  the Pharmacy Act, 1948;  the Drug and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954;  the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985;  the Insecticide Act, 1968;  The Medicinal and Toilet preparation (Excise duties) Act, 1956  and The Drug (Price Control) Order, 1995 (under the essential commodities Act).  Some more laws having a bearing on pharmaceutical manufacture, distribution and sale in India are The Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951,  The Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958,  The Indian Patent Act, 1970  and the Design Act, 2000  and the Factories Act, 1948. 
Lack of co-ordination between various agencies has resulted in approvals of around 33 drugs without any Clinical trials between January 2008 and October 2010 as concluded by the 59 th report of Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare.  However, clinical trials in India are regulated by the following guidelines/rules such as Rule 122 A to E of Drugs and Cosmetic Act,  Schedules Y of Drugs and Cosmetic Act and Rules thereunder (Amended in 2005), GCP guidelines issued by CDSCO in 2001 and Ethical guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Subjects by ICMR. Rule 122 DA of D and C  Act enshrines that Clinical Trials for a new drug/investigational new drug, whether for clinical investigations, or any clinical experiment by an institution shall be conducted except under, in accordance with, the permission, in writing of the Licensing Authority designated by Central Authority while Rule 122 E  of Schedule Y clearly defines 'new drug' as new molecules as well as drugs used abroad but to be introduced for the first time in the country. New indication or new dosage form of an already approved drug is also considered as a new drug. Even fixed dose combinations of drugs already in use are considered as new drugs. Clinical trials has been defined in Rule 122DAA  of the D and C Act in India as " Systemic study of new drugs in human subject(s) to generate data for discovery and/or verifying the clinical, pharmacological (including pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics) and/or adverse effects with the objective of determining safety and/or efficacy of the new drugs.
It has to be a responsibility of all stakeholders viz., Investigators, Ethics Committee, Sponsor, Regulatory authority to ensure the safety and wellbeing of subjects and obtaining the quality data. New revised schedule Y of D and C act is step of Indian Government towards harmonizing with the guidelines of International bodies such as World Health Organization (WHO) and ICH guidelines based on 'Declaration of Helsinki'.  For conducting a Clinical trial in India it is necessary to apply in prescribed Form '44' along with requisite fees.
Indian government has strengthened CDSCO and DCG (I) office by expanding and reorganizing it along the line of FDA. DCG (I) along with ICMR have adopted many international guidelines for framing the local regulatory version such as guidelines. Schedule Y defines the clinical trials as the requirements and guidelines for import and manufacture of new drugs for sale or for clinical trials. It describes the details of application process for conducting clinical trials; responsibilities of the sponsor, investigators and the Independent Ethics Committee.
A Clinical Trials can only be initiated after obtaining written permission from IEC and DCG (I). Application utilizes form 44 accompanied by the requirement [Table 4], as per schedule Y, such as documents pertaining chemical, pharmaceutical information, animal pharmacology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology data. Other documents submitted with application are investigator's brochure, trial protocol, case report form, informed consent form, patient information sheet and investigator's undertaking. Additional requirements for studies in special population, e.g., children, pregnant women, nursing women, elderly patients, patients with renal or other organ system failure, and those on specific concomitant medication(s). The protocol must be reviewed and approved by an IEC, at minimum, seven members, including a medical scientist, a clinician, a statistician, a legal expert, a social scientist and a common person from the community.
|Table 4: Important forms and rules of drug and cosmetic act for clinical research|
Click here to view
Once approved by DCG(I) and IEC, an applicant can start clinical trial as per Schedule Y. Product imported from other countries require a separate license called 'T-license' (Trial License), This license is valid for multiple shipments for one year and issued simultaneously with that of the clinical trial approval. A No Objection Certificate (NOC) through separate application is required for shipping biological samples collected from the trial subjects out of India. Both T-License and NOC are granted within two to four weeks after approval of the study.
The protocol of the study can be amended in between, if necessary, whether major or minor changes. But all amendments should be notified in writing to the DCGI along with the approval of ethics committee. No changes should be implemented, unless to eliminate hazards to the participating subjects, without prior written approval of Ethics Committee and the DCGI. However administrative and/or logistic changes in the protocol should be notified to the approving authorities within 30 days of implementation. All unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs) must be communicate to the DCG (I), Directorate General of Health Services, CDSCO, Pharmaceutical company, Sponsor, CRO and all participating study investigators within 14 calendar days.  SAE notification must be submitted along with the proof that the same information has been submitted to the regulatory agencies in other countries where study is being conducted.
In addition sponsor is required to submit progress report every 6 months  as per the schedule Y format. For studies which are prematurely discontinued for any reason, a summary report should be submitted within three months. This report should provide a brief study description, the number of patients exposed to the drugs, dose and duration of exposure, details of adverse drug reactions, if any, and the reason for discontinuing the study or not pursuing the new drug application.
| Latest Regulatory Initiatives|| |
With the increasing pressure to manage research and development (R and D) in pharmaceutical industry, the government is taking many more initiatives to regulate it.
| Registration of Clinical Trials|| |
Indian council of medical research (ICMR) has started an online registration system of clinical trials in 2007 known as 'Clinical Trial Registration-India (CTRI).  Mainly western and southern cities in India are involved in clinical trials related activities such as Mumbai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Chennai.
| Pharmacovigilance Programme for India|| |
Although every sponsor is mandated to submit developmental safety update report and periodic safety update report but many drugs when exposed to larger masses during the marketing cause newer and unpredictable adverse effects. The government of India has launched the Pharmacovigilance Programme for India (PVPI)  in July 2010 through CDSCO to monitor such developments. It is to be launched in five phases. The first phase was introduced in mid-2010 with an objective of inducting ADR Monitoring Center (AMC) in 40 Medical colleges in one year; 60 more AMC centers are to be added by early 2012 and 100 by 2013. Various hospitals, Medical Colleges and private nursing homes will be covered till 2014. CDSCO will provide the operational and logistic support such as Internet connection, computer, telephone line and WHO will provide free softwares for ADR monitoring such as VigiBase and PaniFlow for ADRs due to vaccines. The National Coordinating Center (NCC) of PVPI is located at 'Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC), Ghaziabad'  and provides all the technical supports to the CDSCO office. ADR reports generated at AMCs are sent to coordinating center which collate, assess and incorporate them into Pharmacovigilance database. The reports finally conveyed to WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Center ADR database.
| Registration of Clinical Research Organisation|| |
Clinical Research activities by pharmaceutical firms are generally outsourced to Clinical Research Organizations (CROs). There are many issues associated with clinical trials like inadequate informed consent, weaknesses of IRB/IEC, inadequate compensation and lack of post-access treatment by these CROs. CDSCO has put up a registration criteria and has issued a draft rules for these mushrooming CROs registration. As per schedule Y-1,  a CRO can carry out clinical research activities for five years if it is duly registered.
| Speeding up Review Process|| |
Review process of clinical trials related applications by CDSCO has been very slow earlier but it has been speeded up by dividing applications in two categories; Category A - is a category where applications are received from the countries where review processes are matured and follow international ethical norms. Category B contains applications from other countries. The median review process has reduced from 16 weeks to 10 weeks and is targeted to be 45 days only. The introduction of e-governance initiatives has made file tracking system and daily dispatch of reports more transparent and accountable.
| Clinical Trial Inspection|| |
In 2008 the CDSCO started inspection of clinical trials in India.  But Full fledge onsite inspection started quite recently in 2010 by US-FDA trained Indian Inspectors and regulatory experts to uphold the quality of the trials. CDSCO has also started a Clinical Trial Inspection Programme and released a guidance document for clinical trial inspection of the site of clinical trial, Sponsor and CROs facilities as well as providing information to the investigators, Sponsors and CROs about procedures of inspection and follow up action.
Despite good guidelines in the book, there implementation has been a problem for the government. Many cases including Anticancer drug study in Kerala,  recruitment of poor family's children at AIIMS resulting in death of around 49 kids  points to the finger at the weaknesses of Institutional Review board/Independent Ethics committee.
Furthermore, many startling lapses on the part of Indian drug regulatory bodies have surfaced after the observation of 59 th report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare. It is now obvious that much more needs to be done to prevent the unnecessary approvals of drug under waiver clause of 122A, 122B, 122D, 122DA, 122DAA and 122E of the Schedule Y rules and blocking the approvals of FDCs which are already banned in other countries.
In our view the Indian regulatory agency still have much to learn and realize the need for availability of safe medication in the public domain. There is a need to introduce new updated dynamic monitoring tools such as Adverse Events Reporting system (AERS) inbuilt in its website and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) by the pharmaceutical companies as needed by FDA. It needs to frame a more systematic review process of drugs before approval as well as framing a priority review setup for Indian specific drugs discovery and marketing.
| References|| |
|1.||Confederation of Indian Industry. Background paper. Conference on Clinical research: Roadmap for India, New Delhi: Sep 2003, 24-25. Available from: http://www.icriindia.com/pdf/conference-on-clinical-research-road-map-for-india.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|2.||U.S. Government Printing Office. Code of Federal Regulation, Part 46. 102(d). Available from: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/textidx?c=ecfr & sid=40b8414de2b96f123d892712afc06258&rgn=div5 & view=text and node=45:188.8.131.52.25 & idno=45#45:184.108.40.206.220.127.116.11. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|3.||Maiti R, M R.Clinical trials in India. Pharmacol Res 2007;56:1-10. |
|4.||RNCOS [Internet]. Booming Clinical Trials Market in India, Aug 2011, Available from: http://www.rncos.com/Report/IM564.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|5.||Modern Medicine (Home page). Lamberti MJ, Space S, Gammbrill S. Going global. Jun 1 2004. Available from: http://www.modernmedicine.com/modernmedicine/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=98387. [Last accessed on 2012 Aug 17]. |
|6.||Clinical Trials in India-Industry Report, CYGNUS Business Consulting and Research, Nov 2005. |
|7.||Applied Clinical Trials (Home page). Wechsler J. FDA seeks new approach to global challenges. 2011 Aug 01. Available from: http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/appliedclinicaltrials/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=734368. [Last accessed on 2012 Aug 17]. |
|8.||Jayasheel BG. Carrying out clinical trials in India. Available from: http://www.acunovalife.com/pdf/whitepapers/RAJ_Pharma%20June%202010_Jayasheel%20final.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 04]. |
|9.||Federations of Indian chambers of commerce and industry; the Glorious metamorphosis: Compelling reasons for doing clinical research in India, Sep 2009. Available from: http://www.ficci.com/publication-page.asp?spid=20026. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|10.||Social Sector: Volume II; Planning Commission, Government of India. Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012). New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2008. |
|11.||Chatterjee P. Clinical trials in India: Ethical concerns. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:581-2. |
|12.||Varma S. India a hobted for clinical trials. Available from: http://www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1776215.cms. [Last accessed on 2008 Mar 06]. |
|13.||Mehdiratta R, Parida DK, Saberwal G. Bio-business in brief: The challenges of clinical trials. Curr Sci 2007;93:1367-75. |
|14.||Sinha K. India Overtakes china as a no.1 destination for clinical trials. Available from: http://www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India_overtakes_China_as_no1_destination_for_clinical_trials/articleshow/2927126.cms. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 20]. |
|15.||Abraham A, Jones J, Vikram S. How to minimize low enrolling sites: A case study in diabetes. Perspect Clin Res 2010;1:25-8. |
|16.||Pandiya A. Quality of Independent review board/ethics committee oversight in clinical trials in India. Perspect Clin Res 2011;2:45-7. |
|17.||ICH harmonized tripartite guidelines. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice E6. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 2001;47:45-50. Available from: http://www.jpgmonlins.com/text.asp?2001/47/1/45/235. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 24]. |
|18.||Rai K. Integrated monitoring: Setting new standards for the next decade of clinical trial practice. Perspect Clin Res 2011;2:28-33. |
|19.||Hunter P. The health of European medical research. Attempts are under way to update EU regulations, with the aim of harmonizing clinical research across the continent. EMBO Rep 2011;12:110-2. |
|20.||Kapp MB. Ethical and Legal issue in research involving human subjects: Do you want a piece of me. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:335-9. |
|21.||Bhatt A. Indian clinical trials: Paradigm shift from speed to quality? Perspect Clin Res 2012;3:1-3. |
|22.||Pharmaceutical Policy-2002. Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals. Available from: http://www.chemicals.nic.in/pharma4.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Aug 17]. |
|23.||Singh H. Sir Ram Nath Chopra: A profile. J Young Pharm 2009;1:192-4. |
|24.||The Drug and Cosmetic Act, 1940 and The Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 as amended time to time. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/Drugs&CosmeticAct.pdf. [Last accesseed on 2012 Jul 10]. |
|25.||Central Drugs Standards Control organization. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Available from: http://cdsco.nic.in/html/organisationalchart.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 04]. |
|26.||MedIndia (Home page). Drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 - The drug consultative committee. Available from: http://www.medindia.net/indian_health_act/drugs-and-cosmetics-act-1940-the-drugs-consultative-committee.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Aug 18]. |
|27.||Narrain S. A costly prescription. Frontline 2005;22:12-25. |
|28.||Damodaran AD. Indian Patent Law in the post - TRIPS Decade: S and T Policy Appraisal. J Intellect Prop Rights 2008;13:414-23. |
|29.||Tulasi GK, Rao BS. A detailed study of patent system for protection of inventions. Indian J Pharm Sci 2008;70:547-54. |
|30.||Saha CN, Bhattacharya S. Intellectual property rights: An overview and implications in pharmaceutical industry. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2011;2:88-93. |
|31.||Otten A. The GATT TRIPS Agreement and health care in India. Natl Med J India 1995;8:1-3. |
|32.||Thawani V, Gharpure K, Thawani M. Patent laws must be in the national interest. Indian J Pharmacol 2006;38:70-2. |
|33.||Praveen Raj RS, "India moving to strong patent regime-challenges and Concerns, Scientist-IP management, Regional Research Laboratory, Trivandrum. Available from: http://www.Patentmatics.org/pub2005/pub10b.pdf on 13-10-2005. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|34.||Health Group Criticizes India′s New Drug Patent Law. Available from: http://www.Scitech-today.com/story.html? Story_id=31764 on 27-03-2005. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|35.||Amended Schedule Y [Drug and Cosmetic act (2 nd amendment) rules]. 20 January 2005, New Delhi. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/html/scheduleY%20(Amended%20Version2005)%20original.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|36.||ICMR, Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants, 2006. Available from: http://www.icmr.nic.in/ethical_guidelines.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|37.||CDSCO, Good Clinical Practices for Clinical Research in India, Schedule Y (Amended Version - 2005). Available from: http://cdsco.nic.in/html/GCP1.html. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|38.||Nundy S, Gulhati CM. A new colonialism - Conducting clinical trials in India. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1633-6. |
|39.||Thatte UM, Bavdeka SB. Clinical Research in India: Great expectations. J Postgrad Med 2008;54:318-23. |
|40.||Viswanath K. Foreign firms drive surge in tech patents, trend reflects the more complex R and D work being done in India, MNCs outpace local peers. Live Mint, 2008 June 9. |
|41.||Central Drug Standard Control Organization. Targeted Timelines for Approvals of Complete Applications by DCG(I) office. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/revised_new_timelines.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|42.||Kumar M, Kher S. Regulatory consideration for conducting clinical trials in India. Regul Aff Focus 2007;12:26-31. |
|43.||Kumar M. Practical aspects of conducting clinical trials in India. Regul Focus 2009;30-7. Available from: http://www.amarexcro.com/articles/docs/RAPS_Focus_Practical_Feb2009.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Sept 19]. |
|44.||Ghooi RB. Trials and tribulations of clinical research teaching and training. Perspect Clin Res 2010;1:139-42. |
|45.||Patel KT, Chotai NP. Pharmaceutical GMP: Past, Present and Future - A review. Pharmazie 2008;63:251-5. |
|46.||Sweatman J. Good clinical practice: A nuisance, a help or a necessity for clinical pharmacology? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;55:1-5. |
|47.||Selvakumar R. Good laboratory practices. Indian J Clin Biochem 2010;25:221-4. |
|48.||Ezzelle J, Rodriguez-Chavez IR, Darden JM, Stirewalt M, Kunwar N, Hitchcock R, et al. Guidelines on good clinical laboratory practices. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2008;46:18-29. |
|49.||Guiding document for zonal and sub zonal. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/Guidance_doc_fuct_cdsco_subzonal/guidingdocumentsforzona and subzonal&portoffices 17.06.2011.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|50.||NPPA-Home page, National Pharmaceutical policy Authority. 2008. Available from: http://www.nppaindia.nic.in/index/.html. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|51.||Drug Policy 2002. Available from: http://www.dbtbiosafety.nic.in/Files/CD_IBSC/Fi-Les/2002.PDF. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|52.||Drug (Price Control) Order 1995. Available from: http://www.nppaindia.nic.in/drugprice95/txt.html. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|53.||Pharmaceutical policy. Feb 15, 2002. Available from: http://www.nppaindia.nic.in/May2002/policy02.html. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|54.||Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology. Available from: http://www.dbtindia.nic.in/index.asp. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|55.||Atomic Energy Regulatory Board. Available from: http://www.aerb.gov.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|56.||Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Government of India, department of Atomic energy. Available from: http://www.barc.ernet.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|57.||Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Available from: http://www.mohfw.nic.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|58.||Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals (home page), Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers. Available from: http://chemicals.nic.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|59.||Ministry of Environment and Forest (home page). Available from: http://www.moef.nic.in/index.php. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|60.||Ministry of Finance (Home page). Available from: http://www.finmin.nic.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|61.||Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Commerce and industry. Available from: http://dipp.nic.in/English/default.aspx. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|62.||Department of science and technology, ministry of science and technology. Available from: http://www.dst.gov.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|63.||Directorate general of foreign Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Available from: http://dgft.gov.in. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|64.||The Poison Act, 1919. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1399304. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|65.||The Pharmacy Act, 1948. Available from: http://www.gujhealth.gov.in/images/pdf/legis/pharmacy-act_1948.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|66.||The Drugs and Magic (Objectionble Advertising) Act, 1954. Available from: http://www.rfhha.org/images/pdf/Hospital_Laws/Drugs_Magic_remedies_(%20advertisement)_act.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|67.||The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Available from: http://www.dor.gov.in/sites/upload_files/revenue/files/pdf/NDPS_Act_1985_as_amended.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|68.||The Insecticides Act, 1968. Available from: http://www.cibric.nic.in/Insecticides_act.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|69.||The Medicinal and Toilet preparation Act, 1985. Available from: http://www.dor.gov.in/medicinalandtoilet act. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|70.||The Drug (Price Control) Order, 1995. Available from: http://www.nppaindia.nic.in/drugprice95/txt1.html. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|71.||The Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. Available from: http://www.dipp.nic.in/English/policies/Industries_act1951.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|72.||The Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958. Available from: http://www.indiaip.com/in-dia/trademarks/acts/tmact1958.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|73.||The Indian Patent Act, 1970. Available from: http://www.spicyip.com/docs/statutecombined%20patents%20act%202005.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|74.||The Design Act, 2000. Available from: http://www.ipindia.nic.in/ipr/design/design_act.PDF. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|75.||The Factories Act, 1948 (Amended on 1987). Available from: http://www.nihfw.nic.in/ndcnihfw/html/Legislations/The Factories Act 1948.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|76.||Srinivasan S. A stinging indictment of india′s Drug regulatory Authority. Economic and Political weekly 2012;47:10-3. |
|77.||Guidelines on approval of clinical trials and new drugs. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/Guidance_for_New_Drug_Approval.23.07.2011.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|78.||World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Available from: http://www.wma.net/epolicy. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|79.||CDSCO. Draft guidance for industry on reporting serious adverse events occurring in clinical trials. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/SAE%.20GUIDELINES%2005-052011.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|80.||Francis PA. Post marketing surveillance. Pharmabiz.com. 2012, May 30. Available from: http://www.pharmabiz.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?aid=69273&sid=3. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|81.||Tharyan P, Ghesri D. Registering clinical trials in India: A scientific and ethical imperative. Natl Med J India 2008;21:31-4. |
|82.||Pharmacovigilance programme of India 2010. CDSCO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2010. Nov. Available from: http://www.cdsco.nic.in/pharmacovigilance_intro.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|83.||Indian Pharmacopoeias Commission. NCC Pharmacovigilance programme of India. Available from: http://www.ipc.gov.in/index1.asp?linkid=222. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|84.||Babu G. Centre releases draft rule for schedule Y-1 mandating registration of CROs. Pharmabiz.com, Mumbai, 2009, July 11. Available from: http://pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=51414 &sid=2. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|85.||Alexander J. On-site inspection of clinical trials to be intensified by CDSCO teamdsoon. Pharmabiz.com, Mumbai, 2009, July 21. Available from: http://pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=51551 &sid=2. [Last accessed on 2012 Jul 07]. |
|86.||Dalvi B. Drug trials in children: Doubts and dilemmas. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2008;1:81-2. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Clinical research: What potential investigators should know
| ||Prateek Rohatgi,Swati Chabbra,Atul Gogia,Atul Kakar |
| ||Current Medicine Research and Practice. 2016; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Industry-sponsored clinical research outside high-income countries: an empirical analysis of registered clinical trials from 2006 to 2013
| ||Srinivas Murthy,Kenneth D. Mandl,Florence T. Bourgeois |
| ||Health Research Policy and Systems. 2015; 13(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||10 years after implementation of TRIPS obligations in India
| ||Mahesh D Pawar |
| ||Pharmaceutical Patent Analyst. 2015; 4(3): 147 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Regulatory and clinical considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs
| ||Charles L Bennett,Brian Chen,Terhi Hermanson,Michael D Wyatt,Richard M Schulz,Peter Georgantopoulos,Samuel Kessler,Dennis W Raisch,Zaina P Qureshi,Z Kevin Lu,Bryan L Love,Virginia Noxon,Laura Bobolts,Melissa Armitage,John Bian,Paul Ray,Richard J Ablin,William J Hrushesky,Iain C Macdougall,Oliver Sartor,James O Armitage |
| ||The Lancet Oncology. 2014; 15(13): e594 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Cancer research in India: national priorities, global results
| ||Richard Sullivan,Rajendra A Badwe,Goura K Rath,C S Pramesh,V Shanta,Raghunadharao Digumarti,Anil DæCruz,Suresh C Sharma,Lokesh Viswanath,Arun Shet,Manavalan Vijayakumar,Grant Lewison,Mammen Chandy,Priyadarshini Kulkarni,M R Bardia,Shaleen Kumar,Rajiv Sarin,Paul Sebastian,Preet K Dhillon,Preetha Rajaraman,Edward L Trimble,Ajay Aggarwal,D K Vijaykumar,Arnie D Purushotham |
| ||The Lancet Oncology. 2014; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|