Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 2209  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
DENTAL SCIENCE - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 567-571  

Evaluation of dental age in protein energy malnutrition children


1 Department of Pedodontics, Navodaya Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission28-Apr-2015
Date of Decision28-Apr-2015
Date of Acceptance22-May-2015
Date of Web Publication1-Sep-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vinod Kumar
Department of Pedodontics, Navodaya Dental College and Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.163543

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Knowledge of dental age is very essential for a dental practitioner in planning treatment and it is a supplementary source of information for Pediatrician, Orthopedician and Endocrinologist. There are few studies in the literature about the comparison of dental with chronological age in protein energy malnutrition children (PEM). Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare dental age and chronological age in PEM children. Aims and Objective: To determine and compare dental age and chronological age in PEM children. Methods: A total of 100 PEM children within the age range of 6-12 years were selected. Chronological age was recorded using date of birth. Dental age was assessed by Demirjian's method using orthopantomogram. Comparison of two ages was done using the unpaired Student's t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: Dental age was retarded compared to chronological age, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The correlations between two ages were positive in both sexes. Conclusion: Dental age was delayed in our sample of 100 PEM children. Dental age can be considered as variable for diagnosing growth retardation in PEM children. Further studies are required to support our findings.

Keywords: Demirjian′s Method, dental age, protein energy malnutrition


How to cite this article:
Kumar V, Patil K, Munoli K. Evaluation of dental age in protein energy malnutrition children. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7, Suppl S2:567-71

How to cite this URL:
Kumar V, Patil K, Munoli K. Evaluation of dental age in protein energy malnutrition children. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Aug 19];7, Suppl S2:567-71. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2015/7/6/567/163543

Growth is an essential feature of the life of a child that distinguishes him or her from an adult. The process of growth starts from the time of conception and continues until the child grows into a fully mature adult. Growth denotes a net increase in the size or mass of tissues, whereas development specifies maturation of functions. [1] Hereditary, functional, environmental, nutritional, sexual, metabolic, social, emotional and cultural factors affect growth and development greatly. [2] Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) refers to "an imbalance between the supply of protein and energy and the body's demand for them to ensure optimal growth and function" It is a major public health problem in India. It affects particularly the preschool children (<6 years) with its dire consequences ranging from physical to cognitive growth and susceptibility to infection. This affects the child at the most crucial period of time of development, which can lead to permanent impairment in later life. PEM is measured in terms of underweight (low weight for age), stunting (low height for age) and wasting (low weight for height). [3]

Studies have demonstrated that child malnutrition is associated with several health problems. [4],[5],[6],[7],[8] When analyzing the consequences of malnutrition to oral health, some studies have associated malnutrition with a higher prevalence of dental caries, [6] as well as dental malformations [7] and soft tissue injuries. [9],[10],[11] Nevertheless, even though some authors have found a significant adverse effect of malnutrition on the growth and development of facial bones of children [12],[13] and on the development of skeletal muscles [14] (demonstrated by reduced measures of the length of the skull base, height of the jaw, [12] width of the maxilla and mandible, lower face height [13] and dental and skeletal ages). [15]

The development and eruption of the teeth are part of the child's total development. Tooth development is a useful measure of maturity since it represents a series of recognizable events that occur in the same sequence from an initial event to a constant endpoint. Estimation of dental age is based on the rate of development and calcification of tooth buds and their progressive sequence of eruption in the oral cavity. The tooth calcification provides a valuable indicator of dental age and serves as an index of the maturation of the child. Dental formation of calcification, which is a continuous developmental process, should be considered a better measure of physiological maturity than dental emergence. Several methods have been developed in order to assess the dental age according to the degree of calcification observed on permanent teeth. One such widely used method is that given by Demirjian, Goldstein and Tanner based on a large number of Canadian children. [16]

There are few published data about the affect of growth retardation on dental maturity in children with PEM. Accordingly, the current study was planned to evaluate and compare dental age and chronological age in children with PEM.


   Materials and Methods Top


The children were selected from the outpatient Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. Prior to the commencement of the study ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Clearance Committee of the College. The nature of the study was explained, and informed consent was obtained from the parent of the patient. Sample sizes of 100 PEM children were selected between the age group of 6 and 12 years. Children undergoing treatment for PEM were excluded from the study. Armamentarium for the study included orthopantomograms (OPG), weighing machine, stadiometer, and X-ray viewer.

Selection criteria of the sample: PEM is determined using Waterlow established classification for malnutrition. [17] Instead of using just weight for age measurements, the classification established by Waterlow combines weight-for-height (indicating acute episodes of malnutrition) with height-for-age to show the stunting that results from chronic malnutrition. [18]

The measurement of weight was done by using bathroom scale for weight records nearest to 0.1 kg. The child was weighted with minimum clothes without touching anything with 500 gram was subtracted from the total weight to compensate for underneath clothes. [19]

The measurements of height was done by using the ordinary measuring tape fixed at the wall and the child standing up after removing the shoes with feet parallel to each other and pointed forward and the back is straight in upright position. The knee was straight, and the head was in position that Frankfort plane (the line between the lower border of the orbit and the upper margin of the external auditory meatus) was horizontal. [19]

Protein energy malnutrition is diagnosed in accordance with Waterlow classification [Table 1]. [18]
Table 1: Water flow classification of PEM

Click here to view


The child diagnosed with PEM was included under the study.

The chronological age was recorded the actual date of birth either stated by the parents or guardians or as per school records.

An OPG was obtained for each child to determine the dental age. Interpretation of the radiographs was carried out with the help of an X-ray viewer.

Determination of dental age was based on the rate of development and calcification of tooth buds. Dental age estimation was done using Demirjian's method [20] considering seven permanent left mandibular teeth from the central incisor to II molar (If any tooth was congenitally missing, contralateral tooth was considered). Demirjian et al., [19] divided tooth development into eight developmental stages from A to H.

Demirjians tooth mineralization (developmental) stages [Figure 1] are as follows:

Stage A: Beginning mineralization of separate cusps
Stage B: Fusion of cusps
Stage C: Beginning of dentinal deposits is seen
Stage D: Crown formation completed down to the cemento-enamel junction
Stage E: The root length is less than the crown height
Stage F: The root length is equal to or greater than crown height
Stage G: The walls of the root canal are parallel and its apical end is still partially open
Stage H: The apical foramen is completed.

Figure 1: Demirjian's tooth calcification stages

Click here to view


Each tooth was assigned a score based on its developmental stage [Table 2] and [Table 3]. The sum of seven individual scores gives maturity score, which is converted into dental age using conversion chart [Table 4] and [Table 5].
Table 2: Self - weighted scores of dental stages of 7 teeth (mandibular left side) in boys

Click here to view
Table 3: Self - weighted scores of dental stages of 7 teeth (mandibular left side) in girls

Click here to view
Table 4: Conversion of maturity score to dental age: For boys

Click here to view
Table 5: Conversion of maturity score to dental age: For girls

Click here to view


Procedure of dental age estimation

Orthopantomograms [Figure 2] were analyzed for the developmental stages of all the 7 left permanent mandibular teeth as per Demirjian's method [Figure 1]. The developmental stage of each tooth was assessed and then each tooth was given a score according to its stage of development using the score table [Table 2] and [Table 3]. Adding seven individual scores from permanent central incisor to 2 nd permanent molar gives a maturity score, it will be converted into dental age using conversion chart [Table 4] and [Table 5].
Figure 2: Orthopantamogram

Click here to view


Maturity score = developmental scores of 31 + 32 + 33 + 34 + 35 + 36 + 37.

[31: Left mandibular central incisor, 32: Left mandibular lateral incisor, 33: Left mandibular canine, 34: Left mandibular 1 st premolar, 35: Left mandibular 2 nd premolar, 36: Left mandibular 1 st molar, 37: Left mandibular 2 nd molar].

The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis. The chronological age and dental age were compared using the unpaired Students t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.


   Results Top


The study comprised a total of 100 PEM children within the age group of 6-12 years. In the total sample, 61 were males, and 39 were females. Dental age estimation was done using Demirjian's method.

The mean chronological and dental ages in both sexes has been tabulated in [Table 6].
Table 6: Mean chronological age, dental age and bone age of females and males

Click here to view


In females [Table 7] chronological ages were higher compared to dental ages and the difference was statistically significant. The correlation between chronological age and dental age were positive and statistically significant [Table 8].
Table 7: Comparison of chronological age and dental age in females

Click here to view
Table 8: Correlation between chronological age and dental age in females

Click here to view


Similarly in males [Table 9] the chronological ages were advanced compared to dental ages and the difference was statistically significant. The correlation between chronological age and dental age were positive and statistically significant [Table 10].
Table 9: Comparison of chronological, dental age and bone age in males

Click here to view
Table 10: Correlation between chronological age and dental age in males

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Dental age is very important in dentistry and medicine. It is very important for the dental surgeon to formulate a treatment plan and useful for the pediatrician, orthopedician and endocrinologist as a source of complementary information. Therefore, this study was undertaken to determine and compare the dental and chronological age in PEM children.

Dental age has often been used to study the somatic maturity. Eruption and calcification of dental tissues have been used to determine dental age. Tooth calcification is superior to tooth emergence because emergence of a tooth a fleeting event and its precise time is difficult to determine, whereas calcification is a continuous process that can be assessed by permanent records such as X-ray films. [16] In the present study, dental age estimation was done using Demirjian's method. Hägg and Matsson [21] compared the reliability of three different dental age assessment methods and concluded that the method described by Demirjian and Goldstein affords a high degree of reliability and precision. Nanda and Chawla, [22] Hegde and Sood [23] applied Demirjian's method on Indian population and found the accuracy of Demirjian's method when applied to the Indian population.

There are many studies which proved the effect of growth disorders on dental maturity. Our study was undertaken to assess the effect of PEM on dental maturation. In our study, dental age was reduced compared to chronologic age in both males and females. The results of our study are in agreement with those of Vallejo-Bolaños and España-López [24] Takano et al., [25] Keller et al. [26] and Sarnat et al. [27] Vallejo-Bolaños and España-López [24] discovered a delay in dental age and bone age in 54 familial short statured children. Sarnat et al. [27] conducted a study on 19 patients with growth hormone deficiency and 13 patients with Laron type dwarfism and discovered a delay in dental age of 1.8 and 1.7 years respectively for these two disorders.

Alvear et al.[28] studied 40 preschool children who had been admitted to hospital in infancy with PEM Growth measurements were made over a period of 4-6 years and bone age was determined in a subgroup through wrist roentgenograms the results showed a delay in bone maturation.

Nakamoto et al. [29] studied the effect of PEM on the growth of molar and incisor tooth germs they found significant differences between control and malnourished groups in the weights and calcium contents of both tooth germs. The data point to the importance of the effect of the nutrient deficiency on the critical growth period of an oral structure.

In our findings, the co-relationships between dental age and chronological age were positive in both sexes. We found similar results in other studies such as Vallejo-Bolaños and España-López, [24] Green [2] Hegde and Sood [23] Prabhakar et al., [16] who also discovered positive correlations between dental age, bone age and chronological age. Many previous authors have studied on the corelationships between biological ages and concluded that various growth indicators are positively correlated.


   Conclusion Top


Dental age was delayed in our sample. Our study showed the affect of PEM on dental maturation. Dental age, as opposed to chronological age, is important to know the maturation of various tissue systems and it is useful in dentistry to arrive at definite treatment plan and its additional source of information in the field of pediatrics, orthopedics, endocrinology, forensics, hematology, and anthropology. Dental age can also be considered as variable for diagnosing growth retardation in PEM children.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Ghai OP, Gupta P, Paul VK. Ghai Essential Pediatrics. 6 th ed. New Delhi: CBS Publisher; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Green LJ. The interrelationships among height, weight and chronological, dental and skeletal ages. Angle Orthod 1961;31:189-93.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bhutia DT. Protein energy malnutrition in India: The plight of our under five children. J Family Med Prim Care 2014;3:63-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
4.
The United Nations Children′s Fund (UNICEF). Progress for Children: A World Fit for Children Statistical Review. Número 6. New York, NY: UNICEF; 2007. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Progress_for_Children_No_6_revised.pdf. [Last accessed on 2008 Dec 01].  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
The United Nations Children′s Fund (UNICEF). Progress for Children: A Report Card on Nutrition. Number 4. New York, NY: UNICEF; 2006. Available from: http://www.unicef.pt/18/Progress_for_Children_-_No._4.pdf. [Last accessed on 2008 Dec 01].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
The United Nations Children′s Fund (UNICEF). Situação Mundial da Infância. Caderno Brasil. Brasília, DF: UNICEF; 2008. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/brazil/pt/cadernobrasil2008.pdf. [Last accessed on 2008 Dec 01].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Borelli P, Blat SL, Rogero MM, Fock RA. Haematological alterations in protein malnutrition. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2004;26:49-56.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Miranda MC, Nóbrega FJ, Sato K, Pompéia S, Sinnes EG, Bueno OF. Neuropsychology and malnutrition: A study with 7 to 10 years-old children in a poor community. Rev Bras Saude Matern Infant 2007;7:45-54.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gordon N. Oral health care for children attending a malnutrition clinic in South Africa. Int J Dent Hyg 2007;5:180-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chaves AM, Rosenblatt A, Oliveira OF. Enamel defects and its relation to life course events in primary dentition of Brazilian children: A longitudinal study. Community Dent Health 2007;24:31-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Enwonwu CO, Phillips RS, Savage KO. Inflammatory cytokine profile and circulating cortisol levels in malnourished children with necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis. Eur Cytokine Netw 2005;16:240-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Weissman S, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Alvarez JO, Caceda J. Craniofacial growth and development in nutritionally compromised Peruvian children. J Dent Res 1993;72:366. [Abst. 2099].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Songvasin C. Early malnutrition and craniofacial growth. J Dent Res 1994;73:123. [Abst. 835].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alves AP, Dâmaso AR, Dal Pai V. The effects of prenatal and postnatal malnutrition on the morphology, differentiation, and metabolism of skeletal striated muscle tissue in rats. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2008;84:264-71.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Caceda J. Nutritional status and dental and skeletal development in Peruvian children. J Dent Res 1996;75:189. [Abst. 1374].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Prabhakar AR, Panda AK, Raju OS. Applicability of Demirjian′s method of age assessment in children of Davangere. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:54-62.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.
Waterlow JC. Classification and definition of protein-calorie malnutrition. Br Med J 1972;3:566-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]    
18.
Watts G. John conrad waterlow. Lancet 2010;376:1982.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hanoori SA. Effect of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) on oral health status of children aged 6 years old in Sammawa city. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2012;24:150-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211-27.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Hägg U, Matsson L. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: The accuracy and precision of three methods. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:25-34.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Nanda RS, Chawla TN. Growth and development of dentitions in Indian children. I. Development of permanent teeth. Am J Orthod 1966;52:837-53.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hegde RJ, Sood PB. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: Radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:132-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]    
24.
Vallejo-Bolaños E, España-López AJ. The relationship between dental age, bone age and chronological age in 54 children with short familial stature. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997;7:15-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Takano K, Ogiuchi H, Hizuka N, Sangu Y, Shizume K. Oro-maxillofacial development in patients with GH deficiency and in normal short children. Endocrinol Jpn 1986;33:655-64.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Keller EE, Sather AH, Hayles AB. Dental and skeletal development in various endocrine and metabolic diseases. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:415-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Sarnat H, Kaplan I, Pertzelan A, Laron Z. Comparison of dental findings in patients with isolated growth hormone deficiency treated with human growth hormone (hGH) and in untreated patients with Laron-type dwarfism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:581-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Alvear J, Artaza C, Vial M, Guerrero S, Muzzo S. Physical growth and bone age of survivors of protein energy malnutrition. Arch Dis Child 1986;61:257-62.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]    
29.
Nakamoto T, Mallak HM, Miller SA. The effect of protein-energy malnutrition on the growth of tooth germs in newborn rats. J Dent Res 1979;58:1115-22.  Back to cited text no. 29
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9], [Table 10]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1310    
    Printed20    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded39    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal