|DENTAL SCIENCE - CASE REPORT
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 809-811
Complicated canal morphology of mandibular first premolar
Vyapaka Pallavi1, Janga Ravi Kumar1, Ramesh Babu Mandava1, Subramanian Hari Rao2
1 Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Anesthesia, N.T.R University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||28-Apr-2015|
|Date of Decision||28-Apr-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||22-May-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||1-Sep-2015|
Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Drs. Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Gannavaram, Andhra Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
The aim of this article was to report an unusual anatomic variation of mandibular first premolar, with one root and three distinct canals, which leave pulp chamber and merge short of apex to exit as two separate apical foramina. The incidence of three canals existing as two apical foramina has only been documented in the literature by a few case reports. To achieve successful endodontic treatment, the clinician has to identify the different canal configurations and treat them properly.
Keywords: Anatomical variations, mandibular first premolar, root morphology
|How to cite this article:|
Pallavi V, Kumar JR, Mandava RB, Rao SH. Complicated canal morphology of mandibular first premolar. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7, Suppl S2:809-11
|How to cite this URL:|
Pallavi V, Kumar JR, Mandava RB, Rao SH. Complicated canal morphology of mandibular first premolar. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jan 24];7, Suppl S2:809-11. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2015/7/6/809/163576
The prevention and healing of endodontic pathology depend on a thorough chemicomechanical cleaning and shaping of the root canals before a dense root canal filling with a hermetic seal. An awareness and understanding of the presence of unusual root canal morphology can thus contribute to the successful outcome of the root canal treatment.
In general, mandibular premolars are difficult to treat and show high flare-up and failure rate possibly due to extreme variations in the root canal morphology.  Slowey had suggested that mandibular premolars may present with the greatest difficulty of all teeth to treat endodontically.  A University of Washington study assessed the failure rate of nonsurgical root canal treatment in all teeth and found it to be the highest for mandibular first premolars at 11.45%.  Vertucci and Pecora et al. have studied the canal anatomy and configuration of mandibular premolars. Vertucci using a transparent method found 25.5% of 400 mandibular premolars had two apical openings, and 0.5% of the teeth had three apical openings.  Pecora et al. observed that 22.3% of the mandibular first premolars possessed two canals and two separate foramina while 5.12% had two canals and one foramen. Only 0.46% of the first and second premolars examined showed a three-canal and three-foramen configurations. , Zillich and Dawson reported that a second or third canal existed in at least 23% of first premolars.  There seems to be racial predisposition for the presence of two or more canals in maxillary and mandibular premolars. ,,
The occurrence of three orifices with three separate canals and two apical foramina in single-rooted mandibular premolar is rare. The purpose of this article is to report the case of a South Indian patient who has this variation in canal morphology and its subsequent treatment.
| Case Report|| |
A 19-year-old female patient presented with a chief complaint of pain in left lower back tooth region since 10 days. On intraoral examination, mandibular left first premolar showed a large Class I caries involving pulp. The tooth was tender on percussion and showed no response to electrical and thermal pulp testing. Radiographic evaluation with intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiograph showed periapical radiolucency in relation to lower left first premolar [Figure 1]. More than one root canal was suspected in that tooth and extra medially and distally angulated periapical radiograph was taken to help in a better interpretation of the canal system. Based on the clinical and radiographic evidences, it was diagnosed as chronic apical periodontitis in relation to the mandibular left first premolar.
|Figure 1: Preoperative intraoral periapical of mandibular first premolar|
Click here to view
Anesthesia was achieved by means of inferior alveolar nerve block with 1.8 ml of 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline. Teeth were isolated using rubber dam and all caries were removed prior to access opening. After access opening, the trunk of the canal seemed to trifurcate at mid-root level giving rise to three separate canals. The orifices to the three root canals were found and enlarged with Gates Glidden Drill. The pulpal tissue was removed using barbed broach; the working length was determined using periapical radiograph. Working length radiograph revealed three canal orifices leading to three separate canals but exited as two apical foramina's [Figure 2]. The three root canals were thoroughly instrumented and shaped by step back technique to a size 30 (apical preparation), and the root canals were irrigated using 3% sodium hypochlorite and 3% hydrogen peroxide solutions during root canal cleaning. The teeth were then dried with sterilized paper points. Intracanal medication with calcium hydroxide powder mixed with saline, carried through lentulo spirals, was placed. At the second appointment, the root canals were obturated with zinc oxide sealer and laterally condensed Gutta-percha [Figure 3]. A final radiograph was then taken to confirm the quality of the obturation [Figure 4]. The access cavity was sealed with IRM and the patient was then given appointment for permanent restoration.
|Figure 2: Working length intraoral periapical showing three canals with two apical foramina's|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The clinician must be aware of various pathways root canals take to the apex. Failure to recognize anatomical complexities will result in treatment failure. The clinician should view mandibular premolar tooth group as complex and use all available armamentarium to achieve a successful outcome.
Good quality radiographs and thorough radiographic examination are essential for detection of additional canals.  In the present case, the IOPA radiographic features suggested the possibility of three canals. However, because of the superimposition of roots, radiographic diagnosis of three canals is not always possible in all cases. Several other indications may be useful such as use of magnification and fiber optic illumination, dyes, advanced imaging techniques like computed tomography (CT),  spiral CT,  micro-CT. 
An optimum access cavity is equally important criterion to negotiate buccally or lingually deviated canals. A good tactile sense and precurved files will help the clinician to negotiate the canals better for a predictable outcome.
| Conclusion|| |
Careful interpretation of the radiograph, close clinical inspection of the pulpal floor and proper modification of access opening are essential for a successful treatment outcome along with accurate knowledge of anatomical variations.
| References|| |
Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the Pulp. 9 th
ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Elsevier; 2006.
Slowey RR. Root canal anatomy. Road map to successful endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1979;23:555-73.
Robertson D, Leeb IJ, McKee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod 1980;6:421-4.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology of mandibular premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:47-50.
Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:101-10.
Pecora JD, Savioli RN, Costa WF, Cruz- Filho AM, Fidel AM. Fidel RS. Study of the internal anatomy and the length of human lower premolars.Rev Bras Odont 1991;48:31-6.
Zillich R, Dowson J. Root canal morphology of mandibular first and second premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:738-44.
Lu TY, Yang SF, Pai SF. Complicated root canal morphology of mandibular first premolar in a Chinese population using the cross section method. J Endod 2006;32:932-6.
Trope M, Elfenbein L, Tronstad L. Mandibular premolars with more than one root canal in different race groups. J Endod 1986;12:343-5.
Walker RT. Root canal anatomy of mandibular first premolars in a southern Chinese population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;4:226-8.
Eder A, Kantor M, Nell A, Moser T, Gahleitner A, Schedle A, et al
. Root canal system in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: An in vitro
comparison study of computed tomography and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:175-7.
Gopikrishna V, Bhargavi N, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with a single root and a single canal diagnosed with the aid of spiral CT: A case report. J Endod 2006;32:687-91.
Fan B, Yang J, Gutmann JL, Fan M. Root canal systems in mandibular first premolars with C-shaped root configurations. Part I: Microcomputed tomography mapping of the radicular groove and associated root canal cross-sections. J Endod 2008;34:1337-41.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]