|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 252-255
Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal status among Down’s syndrome population in Riyadh City
Khalid Gufran1, Omar Saud Alqutaym2, Abdul Aziz Maree Alqahtani1, Ahmed Mohammed Alqarni1, Essa Ali Essa Hattan1, Refdan Obeid Alqahtani1
1 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|Date of Web Publication||28-May-2019|
Dr. Khalid Gufran
Division of Periodontics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim: Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal status among Down’s syndrome population in Riyadh City. Materials and Methods: A total of 81 male Down’s syndrome subjects were examined in this study. All subjects were recruited from the Saudi Center for Down Syndrome, Riyadh. Clinical examination was carried out by a single precalibrated examiner. Dental caries experience was counted according to the DMFT (decayed, missing, and filled teeth) indexes. Periodontal status was evaluated by using plaque and gingival indexes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19 version. Consequently, Pearson chi-square test and Fisher exact test was used to calculate p-value for parametric variables. Results: In this study 11.1% of the subjects were not having any decayed teeth, 39.5% were not having any missing teeth, and 55.6% were not having any filled teeth. In plaque index, maximum number of subjects in all the age group were in the fair group, and there was a highly significant (P value <0.001) association between the age group and the plaque index groups. In gingival index, maximum number of subjects in all the age group was in the poor group. No significant (P value = 0.697) association between the age group and the gingival index groups was found. Conclusion: The present study concluded that the prevalence of dental caries was high and periodontal status of Down’s syndrome subjects was poor.
Keywords: DMFT, Down’s syndrome, gingival index, plaque index
|How to cite this article:|
Gufran K, Alqutaym OS, Alqahtani AA, Alqarni AM, Hattan EA, Alqahtani RO. Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal status among Down’s syndrome population in Riyadh City. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2019;11, Suppl S2:252-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Gufran K, Alqutaym OS, Alqahtani AA, Alqarni AM, Hattan EA, Alqahtani RO. Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal status among Down’s syndrome population in Riyadh City. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 18];11, Suppl S2:252-5. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2019/11/6/252/258815
| Introduction|| |
Down’s syndrome is a genetic disorder caused by the presence of all or part of an extra 21st chromosome. It is named after John Langdon Down, the English physician who initially characterized the appearance and behavior of these patients in 1866, and is one of the most common causes of mental retardation in children. The disorder was later identified as a chromosome 21 trisomy in 1959. The incidence of Down’s syndrome is estimated at 1 in 600–1000 live births, though those statistics are influenced by several factors, in particular, the age of the mother.,
Periodontal status of both the primary and the permanent dentitions is affected by a rapidly progressing and severe inflammation in more than 50% of patients with Down’s syndrome. There are defects of chemotaxis of polymorphonuclear and other phagocytes, which explain the high incidence of pocketing and marginal bone loss in these individuals.
There are numerous oral abnormalities and the oral status of these individuals has been well reported. Factors such as dental anomalies, malocclusions, and motor disorders (coordination skills) can make it difficult for a Down’s syndrome person to maintain a good oral hygiene independently, but more complex pathologies such as cardiac diseases, suppressed immunity, and respiratory and hematological problems may also aggravate a dental treatment.
As the life expectancy among this population is increasing, school, work, and community settings are becoming the norm for Down’s syndrome persons. The demand for dental care for this group with special needs is also increasing with this incidence trend, and thus every practitioner should have a clear understanding of Down syndrome’s unique characteristics that would undoubtedly influence their dental care and treatment. The aim of this article was to identify the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal status among Down’s syndrome population in Saudi Arabia.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A cross-sectional study was planned to assess the dental caries and periodontal status of Down’s syndrome subjects in Riyadh. A total of 81 male Down’s syndrome subjects were examined in this study. All subjects were recruited from the Saudi Center for Down Syndrome, Riyadh. Consent was obtained from both the parents and the concerned authority to carry out the study. Subject’s age between 16 and 40 years was considered in the study. The inclusion criteria implemented were as follows: (1) cytogenetic diagnosis of trisomy 21, (2) adequate cooperation from the children, and (3) informed consent from the children’s legal representatives. The exclusion criteria were detrimental systemic diseases, compound disability, and extremely uncooperative children.
Clinical examination was carried out by a single precalibrated examiner in the respective institutions using artificial light, plain mouth mirror, and periodontal probe. Prior to conducting dental examination, demographic information was obtained from each subject. Information regarding oral hygiene practices, dietary habits, and the parent’s educational background was provided by participants’ parents.
Dental caries assessment
Dental caries experience was counted according to the DMFT (decayed, missing, and filled teeth) indexes.
Periodontal status was evaluated by Silness and Löe plaque index (PI) (plaque accumulation and the gingival index), which determines the amount and location of dental plaque. A plaque disclosing agent was not used during examination. An examination of plaque was performed visually and using probe.
The scale of assessment was as follows:
- 0: Excellent
- 0.1–0.9: Good
- 1.0–1.9: Fair
- 2.0–3.0: Poor
All the records were coded and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. Consequently, Pearson chi square test and Fisher exact test was used to calculate P-value for parametric variables. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05; confidence interval = 95%.
| Results|| |
[Table 1] shows the descriptive analysis of prevalence of dental caries among Down’s syndrome subjects; 11.1% of the subjects were not having any decayed teeth, 39.5% were not having any missing teeth, and 55.6% were not having any filled teeth. Maximum subjects (i.e., 16 subjects) had three decayed teeth. And one subject had 14 decayed teeth. Fourteen subjects (17.3%) had two teeth missing. And 10 subjects had two filled teeth.
|Table 1: Descriptive analysis of prevalence of dental caries among Down’s syndrome subjects|
Click here to view
[Table 2] shows the association of age group of Down’s syndrome subjects with PI groups. In all the age groups, maximum number of subjects were in the fair group (16–20 years: 41, 21–25 years: 14, 26–30 years: 3, 31–35 years: 2, 36–40 years: 1 subjects). A highly significant (P value <0.001) association between the age group and the PI groups was found.
|Table 2: Association of age group of Down’s syndrome subjects with plaque index groups|
Click here to view
[Table 3] shows the association of age group of Down’s syndrome subjects with gingival index groups. In all the age group, maximum number of subjects were in the poor group (16–20 years: 44, 21–25 years: 12, 26–30 years: 5, 31–35 years: 2, 36–40 years: 2 subjects). No significant (P value = 0.697) association between the age group and the gingival index groups was found.
|Table 3: Association of age group of Down’s syndrome subjects with gingival index groups|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Down’s syndrome is characterized by central growth deficiency with delayed mental and physical development ranging from mild to severe. Furthermore, manual dexterity difficulties may lead to oral hygiene problems, which may lead to accumulation of plaque and debris, hence favoring development of dental caries and periodontal disease.
Low caries experience has been reported in Down’s syndrome children in many countries., A number of studies on oral health status of healthy Saudi children have shown a high caries prevalence in Riyadh., The present study also revealed a high caries prevalence and severity among the Down’s syndrome subjects in Riyadh. This is not in agreement with the study on Down’s syndrome patient in other countries that showed a low caries prevalence as well as a high number of caries-free Down’s syndrome patients. The low caries prevalence in Down’s syndrome children appears to be due to immune protection caused by the elevated salivary Streptococcus mutans–specific IgA concentrations and a simpler occlusal morphology. However, it seems that suboptimal oral hygiene status among the study population has neutralized the above-stated advantages.
There are many factors that can aggravate a dental procedure when treating children and especially those with Down’s syndrome. However, common characteristics such as being quiet, passive, natural spontaneity, genuine warmth, loving music, gentleness, tolerance, and honesty can make a treatment approach possible without sedation. Despite the adequacy of low IQ and delayed mental development, Down’s syndrome individuals have different characters as well as different levels of inabilities, where it has been shown that moderate-to-mild mentally retarded individuals are mobile, functional, and can perform well and are highly motivated during workshops.
Gingival status in the present study reveals maximum number of subjects under poor group. Similarly periodontal disease in Down’s syndrome individuals has been first described by Nash, where she reported that 90% of Down’s syndrome patients exhibit some evidence of periodontal disease. The sample that author examined included children below 7 years and she suggested that the gonads hypofunction is the main reason, which is not accepted nowadays. The occurrence of periodontal disease in Down’s syndrome patients is mostly due to defective immune system rather than poor dental hygiene. All of the longitudinal studies along with the cross-sectional studies reported that the prevalence of periodontal disease in Down’s syndrome individuals is very high and can rapidly progress especially in the young age groups.,
| Conclusion|| |
The present study concluded that the prevalence of dental caries was high and the periodontal status of Down’s syndrome subjects was poor. Oral health promotion programs should be aimed specifically at special needs centers and parents of Down’s syndrome subjects.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Amano A, Murakami J, Akiyama S, Morisaki I. Etiologic factors of early-onset periodontal disease in Down syndrome. Jpn Dent Sci Rev 2008;44:118-27.
Desai SS. Down syndrome: A review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;184:279-85.
Sznajder N, Carraro JJ, Otero E, Carranza FA Jr. Clinical periodontal findings in trisomy 21 (mongolism). J Periodontal Res 1968;3:1-5.
Yam WK, Tse PW, Yu CM, Chow CB, But WM, Li KY, et al
. Medical issues among children and teenagers with Down syndrome in Hong Kong. Downs Syndr Res Pract 2008;12:138-40.
Frydman A, Nowzari H. Down syndrome-associated periodontitis: A critical review of the literature. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012;33:356-61.
Al Habashneh R, Al-Jundi S, Khader Y, Nofel N. Oral health status and reasons for not attending dental care among 12- to 16-year-old children with Down syndrome in special needs centres in Jordan. Int J Dent Hyg 2012;10:259-64.
Stabholz A, Mann J, Sela M, Schurr D, Steinberg D, Shapira J. Caries experience, periodontal treatment needs, salivary pH, and Streptococcus mutans counts in a preadolescent down syndrome population. Spec Care Dentist 1991;11:203-8.
Morinushi T, Lopatin DE, Tanaka H. The relationship between dental caries in the primary dentition and anti S. mutans serum antibodies in children with Down’s syndrome. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995;19:279-84.
Wyne A, Darwish S, Adenubi J, Battata S, Khan N. The prevalence and pattern of nursing caries in Saudi preschool children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:361-4.
Wyne AH, Al-Ghorabi BM, Al-Asiri YA, Khan NB. Caries prevalence in Saudi primary schoolchildren of Riyadh and their teachers’ oral health knowledge, attitude and practices. Saudi Med J 2002;23:77-81.
Johnson N, Young MA, Gallios JA. Dental caries experience of mongoloid children. J Dent Child 1960;27:292-94.
Al-Khadra TA. Prevalence of dental caries and oral hygiene status among Down’s syndrome patients in Riyadh-Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2011; 31:115-17.
Chen CY, Chen YW, Tsai TP, Shih WY. Oral health status of children with special health care needs receiving dental treatment under general anesthesia at the dental clinic of Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2014; 77;198-202.
Reuland-Bosma W, van Dijk J. Periodontal disease in Down’s syndrome: A review. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:64-73.
Macho V, Coelho A, Areias C, Macedo P, Andrade D. Craniofacial features and specific oral characteristics of Down syndrome children. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13:408-11.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]