|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 474-480
Maxillary permanent first premolars with three canals: Incidence analysis using cone beam computerized tomographic techniques
Jeyaraman Venkataraman Karunakaran1, Thiyagarajan Ganeshamoorthy1, Kaliayaperumal Anbarasi2, Nagappan Ragavendran1, Arthanari Kaneesh Karthick3
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry, JKK Nattraja Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, India
2 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, JKK Nattraja Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Web Publication||28-May-2019|
Dr. Jeyaraman Venkataraman Karunakaran
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JKK Nataraja Dental, College and Hospital, Komarapalayam - 638 183, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim: This study aimed to analyze incidence of three canals in human permanent maxillary first premolar teeth using cone beam tomographic techniques. Materials and Methods: The samples were divided into three groups namely Group (GP) I (single rooted [n = 255]), GP II (two rooted [n = 326]), and GP III (three rooted [n = 8)]. The teeth were processed, mounted in arches, coded, and subjected to cone beam tomographic scanning. Incidence of three canals was evaluated by cone beam tomography, compared, and statistically analyzed. Results: The percentage of incidence of three canals in human permanent maxillary first premolar teeth was 1.7% and there was no statistically significant difference of incidence of three canals between studies using cone beam and non-cone beam methodologies. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of the variations they may encounter when endodontically treating a maxillary first permanent premolar and should apply this knowledge in a clinical scenario systematically.
Keywords: Canal configuration, cone beam tomography, maxillary first premolar, three canals
|How to cite this article:|
Karunakaran JV, Ganeshamoorthy T, Anbarasi K, Ragavendran N, Karthick AK. Maxillary permanent first premolars with three canals: Incidence analysis using cone beam computerized tomographic techniques. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2019;11, Suppl S2:474-80
|How to cite this URL:|
Karunakaran JV, Ganeshamoorthy T, Anbarasi K, Ragavendran N, Karthick AK. Maxillary permanent first premolars with three canals: Incidence analysis using cone beam computerized tomographic techniques. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jun 18];11, Suppl S2:474-80. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2019/11/6/474/258897
| Introduction|| |
Awareness of the normal internal anatomy of the teeth and its variations is essential. Maxillary permanent first premolars have root and canal configuration that is variable and the prevalence of three canals is low. These variations can possibly lead to failures of therapy and adequate anticipation and knowledge of these variations ensures long-term success. This also necessitates special clinical assessment, radiographic interpretation, access modifications, and canal preparation methods., Cone beam tomography is a useful recent diagnostic methodology that provides additional information compared to conventional intraoral radiography regarding the tooth and the surrounding structures. The presence of a third canal is often missed and when successfully identified it is difficult to biomechanically prepare. The incidence of a third canal has been widely reported in maxillary first premolars. Three canals have been reported with an incidence of 5% in maxillary first premolars. Operator training is essential to successfully manage these anatomical challenges. This study aimed to analyze incidence of three canals in permanent maxillary first premolars using cone beam computed tomographic techniques.
[TAG:2]Materials and Methods[/TAG:2]
Maxillary permanent first premolar teeth were collected after extraction, cleansed, and stored. The samples were visualized under a magnifying loupe with illumination for presence of intact occlusal and root morphology and selected as per accepted criteria. They were then analyzed using digital radiography and those teeth with canal calcifications and open apices were discarded. A total of 589 teeth (n = 589) were selected, divided into two groups namely Group I (single-rooted maxillary first premolars [n = 255]), Group II (two-rooted maxillary first premolars [n = 326]), and Group III (three-rooted maxillary first premolars [n = 8]) based on their morphological characteristics [Chart 1]. The teeth belonging to respective groups were mounted on a wax occlusal rim, numerically coded with markings so that they were visible during the image analysis procedure, and stored for further analysis. They were then mounted on the cone beam tomography machine and imaging process was performed. Imaging scan was performed in such a way that occlusal surfaces of both the arches face each other with a layer of wax in between them. The presence of three canals was assessed by individually analyzing the samples three dimensionally. The groupwise data observed on the incidence of three canals were recorded and compared statistically, and the results were tabulated. The results were compared with that of previous studies on the prevalence of three canals performed using cone beam techniques. The results of studies on the prevalence of three canals carried out using non-cone beam methodologies were tabulated and compared with those that used cone beam techniques.
| Results|| |
The percentage of incidence of three canals in human permanent maxillary first premolar teeth in this study done using cone beam tomographic analysis was 1.7% [Table 1]; [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. On a statistical comparison and analysis of the results of the incidence of three canals obtained in this study with that of other studies performed using cone beam tomographic techniques [Table 2], the results were found to be statistically on par with that of other studies (P > 0.05). On a statistical comparison between studies done using cone beam tomography techniques and studies using other techniques on the incidence of three canals in maxillary first premolars, no significant difference was found (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. Two single rooted maxillary first premolars with three canal configuration were found [Figure 3] and [Figure 4].,
|Figure 1: Incidence—CBCT studies. CBCT = cone beam computerised tomography|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Two distinct types of three canal maxillary premolars presentations, namely, two-rooted three canal and three-rooted three canal teeth, are found to be present. The maxillary first premolar presenting with three canals, namely, mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and palatal, is similar to maxillary first molars. They are referred to as ridiculous, radiculous, or small molars. The incidence of three canal maxillary first permanent premolar has been reported to be between 0.5% and 11.7% as reported by various studies. The incidence of three canals has also been reported from different population groups., In this study of human maxillary permanent first premolar teeth, the percentage of incidence of three canals in maxillary first premolars is “1.7%”.
Unusual anatomical configurations must be routinely assessed during clinical evaluation, radiographic assessment, and during endodontic treatment procedure. The occurrence of three canals with separate foramina in maxillary first premolar has been shown to be of very low percentage. It has also been documented as practically nonexistent in Asian populations.
Good quality radiographs are mandatory for accurate detection of canals especially when analyzing the anatomic details of the root not clearly visible or distinct. Disappearing or suddenly narrowing root canals should be taken into consideration during preoperative radiographic examination. If the path of the root canal cannot be traced, straightens, or broadens abruptly, the likelihood of an additional canal in the same or additional root should be suspected. This is because the additional canal is superimposed on the first one because of the two-dimensional nature of the radiographic image. When an intraoral radiograph shows an instrument within the canal as eccentric in the roots, the possibility of presence of multiple roots should be considered. Therefore a radiograph of good quality using paralleling radiographic technique with a cone shift in the right direction will provide additional insight into the internal anatomy of the root canal. Three-dimensional analysis methodologies such as cone beam tomography will surely help identify the variant anatomical configurations without fail. Where three root canals are present, the buccal orifices are not well defined on visual inspection. Use and correct directional placement of the endodontic explorer, use of magnification, or a small size file is necessary to identify the canals.,
In certain instances, the two buccal canals arise from a narrow common main canal that extends from the pulp chamber and this creates an “S”-shaped shape of the canal that leads to restriction of instrumentation as it is difficult to confirm to that shape. This situation can be effectively managed by troughing for a depth of 1–2mm in an apical direction and between the two buccal canals. This is similar to the preflaring technique in endodontics during intracanal preparation and “S”-shaped canal shape is straightened out, rendering apical instrumentation more easier and effective. This is carried out after the access preparation. Buccal canals that are narrow should be enlarged carefully and any excess removal of radicular dentin will result in a strip perforation. The safest technique is using a small endodontic file till the full working length. Using step back flaring, reverse flaring, and reverse filing as deemed appropriate after which the canal obturation is carried out. The common root morphology seen in maxillary first permanent premolar when three canals are present is three separate roots, each consisting of a single canal classified as the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, and the palatal. The proper identification of variations in curvature and length of roots allows the operator to adjust his canal preparation technique, thereby avoiding iatrogenic complications. These three-rooted maxillary first premolars resemble the adjacent molars and are therefore sometimes called “radiculous.” There are various methods by which the third canal can be identified using intraoral radiography. Though three-dimensional, the cone beam tomographic investigation cannot be used routinely because of economic and radiation-exposure concerns. The maxillary first premolar routinely has two canals. The presence of a third hidden canal should be searched during access if the pulp chamber appears too large in the mesiodistal plane on the intraoral radiograph. Access cavity outline is determined by the anatomical size and shape of the pulp chamber and the location of the root canal orifices. A modification in the access preparation with a T-shaped access outline helps in the identification of the third canal. This access modification procedure allows for an easy straight line accessibility to the canal system. If a third canal is suspected, the outline is extended by making a ditch cut at the bucco proximal angles from the buccal canal entrance to the cavosurface angle. The buccal orifices may be close to each other and difficult to locate in three-canalled teeth. One may encounter an obstruction and a deflection to the buccal or the lingual side before further exploration of the canal while using a small file. The canal entrance will take an ovoid shape in the buccopalatal direction if there is a bifurcation of the canals in the middle third. The crucial factors in correct diagnosis and easy negotiation are proper tactile feel technique and adequate precurving of the file.
| Conclusion|| |
In addition to having adequate knowledge on the variations of the root canal anatomy, periapical radiographs from different angles, careful examination of the pulp chamber floor, and use of dental operation microscope during the procedure are also important factors that contribute to successful identification of additional roots and canals. The incidence of three-canalled maxillary first premolars bilaterally has also been reported. It is therefore recommended to look for a similar anatomic variation in the contralateral and opposing teeth during preliminary assessment of canal anatomy.,
This study was carried out using cone beam tomographic analysis. On a statistical comparison and analysis of the results of the incidence of three canals obtained in this study with that of other studies performed using cone beam tomographic techniques [Table 2]; [Figure 3], the results were found to be statistically on par with that of other studies (P > 0.05). On a statistical comparison between the studies carried out using cone beam tomography technique and the studies carried out using other techniques [Table 3]; [Figure 4] on the incidence of three canals in maxillary first premolars, no significant difference was found (P > 0.05).
Dealing with maxillary premolars that have three canals during endodontic therapy is challenging. Clinicians should be aware of the variations of anatomy they may encounter when endodontically treating a maxillary first permanent premolar. They should apply this knowledge in a clinical scenario systematically on a case-wise basis. Awareness that they can encounter a third root canal even when three roots are not present, as also recognizing the presence of a third root preoperatively and making suitable modifications to endodontic treatment procedure, will go a long way in achieving successful treatment outcomes. In the maxillary first premolar due to anatomical factors even when the third canal is identified, preparation is a challenge and the operator should sufficiently be trained to handle these clinical skill levels.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Zaatar EI, al-Busairi MA, Behbahani MJ. Maxillary first premolars with three root canals: Case report. Quintessence Int 1990;21:1007-11.
Nimigean V, Nimigean VR, Sălăvăstru DI, Buţincu L. A rare morphological variant of the first maxillary premolar: A case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2013;54:1173-5.
Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top 2005;10:3-29.
Ingle J, Bakland L. Endodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger; 1976. p. 43.
Vertucci FJ, Gegauff A. Root canal morphology of the maxillary first premolar. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99: 194-8.
Sicher H, Dubrul EL. Oral anatomy. St Louis (MO): VC Mosby; 1975. p. 236-9.
Xie K, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang P. [Root canal treatment of two-rooted three-canal maxillary first premolar: a case report]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2013;31:641-3.
Pan JYY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:14.
Mariusz L, Krysof W, Ryta L, Mangorzata T. Root canal morphology of the first human maxillary premolar. Durh Anthro J 2005;12:2-3
Theruvil R, Ganesh C, George AC. Endodontic management of a maxillary first and second premolar with three canals. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:88-91.
] [Full text]
Bellizzi R, Hartwell G. Radiographic evaluation of root canal anatomy of in vivo endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Endod 1985;11:37-9.
Sieraski SM, Taylor GN, Kohn RA. Identification and endodontic management of three-canalled maxillary premolars. J Endod 1989;15:29-32.
Calişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SS. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod 1995;21:200-4.
Dax A, Pravin K. Radiculous premolar. Endodontology 2011;23:95-7.
Miabaum WW. Endodontic treatment of a radiculous maxillary first premolar: A case report. Gen Dentistry 1989;37:340-1.
Agwan AS, Sheikh Z. Identification and endodontic treatment of threecanalled maxillary first premolar. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2016;28:627-9.
Balleri P, Gesi A, Ferrari M. Primer premolar superior com tres raices. Endod Pract 1997;3:13-5.
Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 3rd ed. St Louis (MO): The CV Mosby Company; 1982. p. 207-55.
Ugur Z, Akpinar KE, Altunbas D. Maxillary first premolars with three root canals: Two case reports. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51:50-4.
Gupta SK, Saxena P, Chandra A. The “radiculous” maxillary first premolar: A rare anatomic variation. Gen Dent 2012;60:e178-81.
Javidi M, Zarei M, Vatanpour M. Endodontic treatment of a radiculous maxillary premolar: A case report. J Oral Sci 2008;50:99-102.
Cairns EJ, Skidmore AE. Configurations and deviations of root canals of maxillary first premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36:880-6.
Bellizzi R, Hartwell G. Radiographic evaluation of root canal anatomy of invivo endodontically treated maxillary premolars. J Endod. 1985;11:37-9.
Zaatar EI, al-Kandari AM, Alhomaidah S, al-Yasin IM. Frequency of endodontic treatment in Kuwait: Radiographic evaluation of 846 endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1997;23:453-6.
Kartal N, Ozcelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars.J Endod1998;24:417-9.
Chapparo AJ, Segura JJ, Guerrero E, Jiménez-Rubio A, Murillo C, Feito JJ. Number of roots and canals in maxillary first premolars: study of an Andalusian population. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999;15:65-7.
Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30:391-8.
Dehua D, Mengyong Z, Wendong Wu. The morphology study of root canal system of permanent teeth. Sichuan Journal of Anatomy 2004;12:22-6.
Lipski M, Woniak K, Lagocka R, Tomasik M. Root and canal morphology of the first human maxillary premolar. Durham Anthropology Journal 2005;12:2-3.
Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod. 2008;34:956-61.
Atieh MA. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Saudi population. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9:46-53.
Ng′ang′a RN, Masiga MA, Maina SW. Internal root morphology of the maxillary first premolars in Kenyans of African descent. East Afr Med J. 2010;87:20-4.
Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2012;45:996-1003.
O¨zcan E, Colak H, Hamidi MM Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Turkish population Journal of Dental Sciences 2012;7:390-4.
Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:701-6.
Gupta S, Sinha DJ, Gowhar O, Tyagi SP, Singh NN, Gupta S. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolar teeth in north Indian population using clearing technique: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18:232-6.
Abella F, Teixidó LM, Patel S, Sosa F, Duran-Sindreu F, Roig M. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Analysis of the Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Premolars in a Spanish Population J Endod 2015;41:1241-7.
Stošić N, Dai S, Ranđelovi M, Jovani A, Đorđevi I, Cvetkovi M, et al
. Morphometric Analysis of the Upper Premolars Acta facultatis medicae Naissensis
Celikten B, Orhan K, Aksoy U, Tufenkci P, Kalender A, Basmaci F, et al
. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish Cypriot population. BDJ Open. 2016;2:15006.
Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J. Root and root canal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2017;50:1013-26.
Bürklein S, Heck R, Schäfer E. Evaluation of the Root Canal Anatomy of Maxillary and Mandibular Premolars in a Selected German Population Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Data. J Endod. 2017;43:1448-52.
Banga KS, Pawar AM, Nagpal D, Landge J, Thakur B, Rastogi S. Root canal morphology of premolar teeth in the population of Maharashtra (Pune) compared to the other Indian population. Endodontology 2018;30:15-20. [Full text]
Senan EM, Alhadainy HA, Genaid TM, Madfa AA. Root form and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars of a Yemeni population. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:94.
Nazeer MR, Khan FR, Ghafoor R. Evaluation of root morphology and canal configuration of Maxillary Premolars in a sample of Pakistani population by using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68: 423-7.
Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Premolars in a Saudi Population. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:8170620.
de Lima CO, de Souza LC, Devito KL, do Prado M, Campos CN. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Aust Endod J. 2018 Sep 19. doi: 10.1111/aej.12308. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID:30230115.
Popović M, Papić M, Acović A, Živanović S, Kanjevacm T. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of Root Number and Root Canal Configuration Of Premolars. In Serbian Population Med Pregl 2018; LXXI:100-107. Novi Sad: mart-april.
Dinakar C, Shetty UA, Salian VV, Shetty P. Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary First Premolars Using the Clearing Technique in a South Indian Population: An In vitro Study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018;8:143-147.
[Chart 1], [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]