Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 1087  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 319-323  

Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods


1 Department of Prosthodontics, JKKN Dental College & Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India
2 RVS Dental College and Hospital, Sulur, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission01-Feb-2020
Date of Decision05-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance02-Apr-2020
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
S Preethi Suganya
H38, Phase 4, Muthyampalayam Housing Unit, Rangampalyam Post, Erode, Tamil Nadu.
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_95_20

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Aim: The main purpose of the study was to learn the possible shade differences between human eye and the digital method with spectrophotometric methods. Materials and Methods: Fifty dental students of age groups 18–25 with maxillary right central incisor after undergoing oral prophylaxis were included in this study. Before undergoing shade selection, standardization protocol was followed. The shade of the right maxillary central incisor was determined by using the following methods: visual, spectrophotometer, and digital photography. The shades obtained by both spectrophotometer and visual methods are compared and similarly L*, a*, and b* values obtained by both spectrophotometer and digital methods are compared. Finally these comparisons are subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Z and P values of digital and spectrophotometric methods were found to be statistically significant. Tooth shade selected between spectrophotometric and visual method was analyzed by using chi-square test, which shows highly significant value. Conclusion: It was concluded that the digital photography can be used as one of the reliable methods for shade selection in a clinical setup.

Keywords: Digital photography, shade selection, spectrophotometer, visual shade matching


How to cite this article:
Preethi Suganya S, Manimaran P, Saisadan D, Dhinesh Kumar C, Abirami D, Monnica V. Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2020;12, Suppl S1:319-23

How to cite this URL:
Preethi Suganya S, Manimaran P, Saisadan D, Dhinesh Kumar C, Abirami D, Monnica V. Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 23];12, Suppl S1:319-23. Available from: http://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2020/12/5/319/292910




   Introduction Top


A smile can change drowning things and can give positive aura.[1] But not every single person is blessed with attractive smile. The key to the above problem is esthetic dentistry which was advanced with the latest technologies for better esthetic results.[2] Inappropriate shade selection results in remake of ceramic restorations, but the main cause occurs due to improper tooth preparation and impression making.[3] Hence to overcome the problem, proper understanding and knowledge of color is important. In dentistry, prosthodontist is most likely the best person to rule out the quality of smile especially in esthetics.[4] Thus, the shade selection is considered as an important procedure in fixed prosthodontics. The main aim of the study was to analyze shade differences between the visual and digital methods using spectrophotometer.

Aim

This study compares the shade selection using two different methods, namely visual method (VITA Classical, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) and digital photography method (Canon EOS 750D, 30-2 Shimomaurko 3-chrome, Ohta-ku, Tokyo, Japan) with spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Compact, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany).


   Materials and Methods Top


Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) [Figure 1], VITA classical shade guide (VITAPAN Zahnfabrik, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) with blue reflectant card [Figure 2], and digital camera, such as Canon EOS 750D [Figure 3], Tripod stand, 18% gray reflectant card, and Cheek Retractor, were the materials used in this study.
Figure 1: Spectrophotometer

Click here to view
Figure 2: Visual method

Click here to view
Figure 3: Digital method

Click here to view


Fifty dental students from our dental college of age groups 18–25 with maxillary right central incisor after undergoing oral prophylaxis were included in this study. Before undergoing shade selection procedure, the teeth are dried using cotton. Discolored teeth, restorations, endodontically treated teeth, extrinsic stains, nonvital or fractured teeth, presence of crowns, and veneers are excluded and females were asked to remove the lipstick.[5] The study was proceeded after acquiring the necessary approval from the Ethical committee of the Institution and an informed consent was obtained from the students. The L*, a*, and b* values of spectrophotometer reported along with the actual shade, whereas the image captured by digital photography method reports only the L*, a*, and b* values using Adobe CS software (Bengel, Middle Easter Version by Adobe Version: 8.0) [Table 1].[6] The shades obtained by the visual method were marked down for further comparisons [Table 2]. The readings obtained by these different methods were compared and subjected to appropriate statistical analysis. Standardization protocol was followed during the study. All the shade matching procedures were performed by the same operator.
Table 1: ΔE values and agreement between spectrophotometer and digital methods

Click here to view
Table 2: Agreement between spectrophotometer and visual methods

Click here to view



   Results Top


Tooth shade selected between spectrophotometric and visual method was analyzed by using chi-square test. Chi-square value = 62.216 and P = 0.0001 [Table 3] were found to be highly significant (P < 0.05* indicates statistically significant and P < 0.001** indicates highly significant). On estimating value, the measurement of agreement between the spectrophotometer with digital methods and spectrophotometer with visual methods remains the same, i.e., κ coefficient values will be 0.597 and P value will be 0.001 which shows statistically significant with higher proportion. The nonparametric measure of Spearmen rank correlation is 0.628 and the P value for that rank is 0.001. These values were found to be statistically significant [Table 4]. Here, L, a, and b values of the tooth shade selected between spectrophotometric and digital methods were analyzed by using Wilcoxon signed rank test [Table 5]. Values of Z and P were found to be statistically significant. Similarly, the mean and standard deviation for ΔE difference in shade between spectrophotometric and digital photographic values were found to be 1.49 and 1.29, respectively[Table 6].
Table 3: Comparison between spectrophotometric method and visual method using chi-square test

Click here to view
Table 4: Descriptive and inferential statistics for measure of agreement

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparison between spectrophotometric and digital or photographic methods using Wilcoxon signed rank test

Click here to view
Table 6: Descriptive statistics of ΔE values

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Esthetic dentistry is emerging as one of the challenging branches of this field.[7] Shade matching of maxillary anterior is one of the tough clinical challenges faced in dentistry.[8] However, spectrophotometer method of shade evaluation is considered as gold standard[9] for measuring tooth color and to provide high level of agreement for the usage of shade selection in dentistry. Investigator should get informed consent from the students before starting the procedure and also should get necessary acquiesce from the ethical committee of the institution.[10] The entire procedure was performed between 12.00 PM and 3.00 PM on a bright sunny day.[11] Color perception may vary among the individual observer, so a single investigator is used in the study.[12],[13] To avoid weariness or prostration of the eye, there should be 5s or 7s interval for the investigator to have a look at the blue color cardboard sheet.[14],[15] To avoid color confusion, makeup and lipstick has to be removed from the subject.[16],[17] The subjects were viewed at the eye level by holding the shade tab next to the selected tooth.[18] The shade guide shows variations under fluorescence, incandescence, or daylight.[19],[20] Hue has to be selected first followed by chroma.[21] Shade tab is arranged alphabetically from A to D and values from 1 to 4.[22] Digital photography is the third method used in this study. Recently visual method of shade selection has been replaced by the digital means.[23] This is because it can exactly replicate the color with its high imaging quality.[24] 18% gray card is used in this study for standardization.[25] A gray card is a middle reference point to produce constant image.[24] The red, blue, and green values are equal for gray card and hence it is considered as a neutral target.[26] As the gray card had an unquestionable value, the Adobe Photoshop CS6 also integrates as gray and thus removes the shades of particular color, which affects the photographic image partially or completely.[27] The image was captured as a measured distance of 70cm between camera and patient and the proceed image was transferred to Adobe CS Photoshop to get images of the L, a, and b values.[24] The L, a, and b values are again transformed into L*, a*, and b* by using rule L* = L1 × 100/255, a* = (a1 − 128) × 240/255, and b* = (b1 − 128) × 240/255. The difference in shade (ΔE) between spectrophotometric and digital photography was intended by using the following formula: ΔE = [(L1 − L2)² + (a1 − a2)² + (b1 − b2)²]1/2. If ΔE values should be less than or equal to 2, when more than 2 it is considered that human eye is not perceptible to such values.[28]


   Summary and Conclusion Top


Although dental spectrophotometer is reliable in selecting the shade, it is not easily available to all the clinicians. Digital camera is a common gadget, used in almost every clinic. Numerous clinical studies have established that digitally assisted shade evaluation is more precise when compared with conventional method.[29] When compared to spectrophotometric method, digital method of shade selection is economically low and when compared to conventional method, it records in a detailed manner to perform patient education, documentation of records, and treatments. So with certain limitations of the study, the conclusion is that both visual and digital methods of shade selection show high statistically significance of agreement with spectrophotometer.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Tsiliagkou A, Diamantopoulou S, Papazoglou E, Kakaboura A Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental colour-matching devices. Int J Esthet Dent 2016;11:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisor. J Prosthet Dent 2008;83:418-23.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Aartman IH, Feilzer AJ Relation in color of three regions of vital human incisors. Dent Mater 2004;20:832-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater 2009;25:276-81.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Yilmaz B, Karaagaclioglu L In vitro evaluation of color replication of metal ceramic specimens using visual and instrumental color determinants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;105:21-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wang J, Lin J, Gil M, Seliger A, Da Silva JD, Ishikawa-Nagai S Assessing the accuracy of computer color matching with a new dental porcelain shade system. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:247-53.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R Advances in color matching. Dent Clin N Am 2004;48:341-58.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Moodley DS, Patel N, Moodley T, Ranchod H Comparison of colour differences in visual versus spectrophotometric shade matching. SADJ 2015;70:402-07.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007;16:93-100.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Paravina RD Performance assessment of dental shade guides. J Dent 2009;375:e15-20.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Öngül D, Şermet B, Balkaya MC Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:9-14.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gozalo-Diaz D, Johnston WM, Wee AG Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:93-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sarkis E Color change of some aesthetic dental materials: effect of immersion solutions and finishing of their surfaces. Saudi Dent J 2012;24:85-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bentley C, Leonard RH, Nelson CF, Bentley SA Quantitation of vital bleaching by computer analysis of photographic images. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:809-16.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Land EH The Retinex theory of color vision. Sci Am 1997;237:108-28.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Saleski CG Color, light and shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:263-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mellerio J Light absorption and scatter in the human lens. Vision Res 1971;11:129-41.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Barna GJ, Taylor JW, King GE, Pelleu GB Jr The influence of selected light intensities on color perception within the color range of natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:450-3.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ballard E, Metz MJ, Harris BT, Metz CJ, Chou J-C, Morton D, et al. Satisfaction of dental students, faculty, and patients with tooth shade-matching using a spectrophotometer. J Dent Educ 2017;81:545-53.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Verriest G Further studies on acquired deficiency of color discrimination. J Opt Soc Am 1963;53:185-95.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Fransworth D The Fransworth –Munsell 100- Hue and Dichotomous test for color vision. J Opt Soc Am 1943;33:568-78.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Ahn J-S, Lee Y-K Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:18-28.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Lee Y-K, Yu B, Lim JI, Lim H-N Perceived color shift of a shade guide according to the change of illuminant. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:91-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Miyajiwala JS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Lakha TA Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: a clinical evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017;17:273-81.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Dagg H, O’Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:900-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Li Q, Wang YN Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:848-54.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Bengel WM Digital photography and the assessment of therapeutic results after bleaching procedures. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:S21-32.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnstona WM Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry. Dent Mater 2006;22:553-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005;199:43-9; discussion 33.  Back to cited text no. 29
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    Summary and Conc...
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed60    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded5    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal