|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 266-276
Artificial semi-rigid tissue sensitized with natural pigments: Effect of photon radiations
Adnan Jaradat1, M-Ali H Al-Akhras1, G Makhadmeh1, K Aljarrah1, A Al-omari2, Z Ababneh3, Majed M Masadeh4, HM Al-Khateeb1, BA Albiss1, M Alshorman1
1 Department of Physics, Bio-Medical Physics Laboratory, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
2 Department of General and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan, Jordan
3 Department Physics, Yarmouk University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan
4 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan
|Date of Submission||16-Sep-2010|
|Date of Decision||10-Nov-2010|
|Date of Acceptance||05-Jan-2011|
|Date of Web Publication||12-May-2011|
M-Ali H Al-Akhras
Department of Physics, Bio-Medical Physics Laboratory, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: A new approach for evaluating the optical penetration depth and testing its validity with Monte Carlo simulations and Kubelka-Munk theory is used for artificial semi-rigid tissue sensitized with natural pigments. Photodynamic therapy is a promising cancer treatment in which a photosensitizing drug concentrates in malignant cells and is activated by visible light at certain wavelength. Materials and Methods: Cheap artificial semi-rigid tissue incorporated with scattering and absorbing materials along with some other composites comparable to normal human tissue has been performed. The optical parameters as measured with different conditions and calculated with various techniques are investigated. Results: The probability of interaction of light with tissue is very high when exposed to light in presence of Cichorium pumilum and RBCs followed by photohemolysis or/and photodegradation. The optical penetration depth calculated by linear absorption coefficient ranges from 0.63 to 2.85 mm is found to be comparable to those calculated using Kubelka-Munk theory or Monte Carlo simulation (range from 0.78 to 2.42 mm). The ratio of absorption to the scattering is independent of thickness and decreases with increasing irradiation time. Moreover, the optical parameters as well as their ratios are in very good agreement in the two approaches of calculation. The values of absorption and scattering coefficients are independent of thickness. Furthermore, the average photon ranges in the samples containing no scattering and absorbing materials are about three times greater than those samples containing scattering materials. Conclusion: Our results suggest that light propagation with optical properties presented in this work could be applicable in diagnostic and therapeutic of the human biological tissue for photodynamic therapy.
Keywords: Attenuation coefficient, half value layer, penetration depth, photodynamic therapy, tissue phantom
|How to cite this article:|
Jaradat A, Al-Akhras MAH, Makhadmeh G, Aljarrah K, Al-omari A, Ababneh Z, Masadeh MM, Al-Khateeb H M, Albiss B A, Alshorman M. Artificial semi-rigid tissue sensitized with natural pigments: Effect of photon radiations. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2011;3:266-76
|How to cite this URL:|
Jaradat A, Al-Akhras MAH, Makhadmeh G, Aljarrah K, Al-omari A, Ababneh Z, Masadeh MM, Al-Khateeb H M, Albiss B A, Alshorman M. Artificial semi-rigid tissue sensitized with natural pigments: Effect of photon radiations. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 27];3:266-76. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2011/3/2/266/80781
For the last two decades, extensive work has been done to formulate a tissue phantom comparable to normal human tissue. Cheap artificial semi-rigid tissue has been prepared from several components with optical properties similar to tissue phantom. Artificial tissue incorporated with scatter and absorber materials along with some other composites to perform similar biological tissues are investigated. Samples consist of different optical properties are non-homogeneous and thus light could be scattered, absorbed, reflected, and or transmitted. The main two parameters measured are transmittance and diffuse reflectance of the beam before and after irradiation. The tissue characteristics play an important role in all kinds of medical laser applications, such as photodynamic tumor therapy and photo thermal treatments, and also for cancer diagnostic techniques such as fluorescence diagnostics and transillumination imaging. ,
Laser radiation possesses unique characteristics and is extensively used in clinical sciences for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. These applications depend on the optical characteristics of target tissues and organs.  Moreover, the optical parameters themselves can potentially provide enough information to monitor tissue metabolic status or diagnose disease, particularly cancer. 
Due to difficulties involved in determining the optical properties of in vivo tissue such as stochastic errors originating from temperature, pulsation, hydration, sweatiness and fluid blood, artificial tissues remains a good practical method of isolating particular tissue types.  Biological tissues are known to be predominantly light scattering, typically highly forward directed (anisotropic), in the visible spectral range. 
The design and characterization of an optical phantom, which have the same absorption and scattering characteristics as of biological tissues in a broad spectral window (between 400 and 650 nm) receive more research intention. These low-cost phantoms use agarose that dissolve in water. The resulted mixture acquires same physical characteristics as normal tissue due to agarose addition. These phantoms are loaded with various amounts of silicon dioxide, Intralipid, ink, blood, azide, penicillin, bovine serum, and fluorochromes. Several photosensitizers have been developed during the past.  Foscan (temporfin, meta-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorine) is the only photosensitizer that has been approved for the treatment of advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck in Europe in the year 2001.  The most important parameters involved with the photosensitizer are the period of photosensitivity and the activation wavelength.
One of our main objectives in this research is to use a natural and herbal photosensitizer such as Cichorium pumilum, instead of the commercial approved drug. Natural pigments in some organisms absorb visible and near-ultraviolet light (UV). Natural photosensitizers are present in many organisms including bacteria, fungi, higher plants, protozoa, invertebrates and vertebrates. Chicory flowers and aerial parts are found to be a source of photosensitizers and therefore their extract is used for this study. Chicory is a plant known to cause quick death of white sheep especially during its flowering period in autumn. In contrast, chicory has been shown to reduce intensity of internal parasites in grazing sheep. ,, Chicory is one of the main herbs used in Middle East and multiple uses of different plant parts have been reported.  Leaves and root extracts have been used for curing breast, face cancer. , and against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma.  Chicory's flowers are source of Cichoriin, which is known to be sensitive to light.  Similarly, Lactucin, extracted from chicory roots, is found to be sensitive to light. ,
The light that is used to activate the drug is a very important part of photodynamic therapy. The light of a specific wavelength is needed to activate the drug. Controlled light with a specific wavelength can be directed very precisely through a diffused fiber optic to tumor site. Fiber optics are thin glass strands and looks very much like heavy fishing line, used to translate lights on the desired area in order to activate the drug. Light of a high power with a specific wavelength such as He-Ne laser, LED of a power (75-100 mW), and high pressure arc lamp could be used to activate the drug. The end of the fiber must be placed close to the tumor in order to deliver the proper amount of light for the treatment. The laser light used in PDT is non-thermal and will not burn or harm normal tissue.
When the size of the inhomogeneities is large as compared to the wavelength of light, the incident light is reflected back in all directions, and this is referred to as diffuse reflection, which is in contrast to specular reflection. The angular distribution of the reflected light is independent of the angle of incidence.
Scattering is much stronger and more forward directed when the particles have dimensions of the same order of a wavelength. For large, isotropic, spherical particles with different sizes, Mie scattering occurs. In certain directions, light is completely extinguished, and the scattering is weak and highly forward directed.
Rayleigh and Mie scattering are examples of single scattering. However, when the distance between scattering particles diminishes, as in biological materials, multiple scattering occurs. For a sufficiently large scattering density (great number of particles and thick layer), an isotropic light distribution occurs at some distance away from the surface.
No photoprocess such as photosensitization or fluorescence can happen before a photon is being absorbed by a molecule. The energy of the photon must match the energy difference of the allowed excited states of the electron levels in the molecule.
Several methods for measuring tissue optical parameters have been developed recently. Most of them used light in the visible and near-infrared wavelength range. Up to now experimental methods to determine absorption coefficient, μ a , and scattering coefficient, μ s , of tissues are mostly based on measuring the reflectance or/and transmittance via integrating sphere. , Knowing optical parameters of biological tissue, including absorption coefficient (μ a ), scattering coefficient (μ s ) are essential for effective and safe applications in medical therapeutics. , The absorption and scattering of photons in biological tissues are characterized by the absorption coefficient and scattering coefficient; these coefficients represent the attenuation of incident radiation intensity due to absorption and scattering per unit length in a tissue.  These two parameters also completely describe the propagation of light inside turbid media.  Scattering coefficient, in addition to its applications in nuclear shielding and medical diagnostics, is used extensively to gather information about the structural properties of materials and complex molecules. 
Absorption mechanism converts the energy of an acoustic wave to heat as the wave propagates through a medium.  The light absorption is mainly attributed to tissue pigments such as melanin, bilirubin, hemoglobin, etc. 
Several techniques have been used to measure and calculate the optical properties of tissue. ,,,,,,, A new approach for evaluating the optical penetration depth and testing its validity with Monte Carlo simulations and Kubelka-Munk theory is the main goal of our research.
| Materials and Methods|| |
In the one-dimensional diffusion problem, we are interested in measuring the diffused reflectance R and transmittance T, in order to calculate the coefficients of absorption K and reduced scattering S '. The diffused transmittance and reflectance represent the amount of light that exits the rear and front surfaces of the sample, respectively. For the purpose of these measurements we used the integrating sphere, which provides a measured means of all transmittance or reflectance in the forward or backward hemispheres. The integrating sphere is a hollow sphere with an interior coated with highly diffused reflecting paint. The sample is placed in front of the sphere for transmittance measurements and behind the sphere for diffused reflectance measurements. The entering light is repeatedly reflected at the wall of the sphere until the light intensity at any point on the sphere is proportional to the intensity of the entering light.
The broad-band light source used was a 200-W high-pressure Hg/Xe arc. The exposure light source was filtered by a Corning C.S. No. 0-52 filter (>360 nm) and 2 cm of water. The water filter was placed between the source of light and the sample to reduce heating. Energy fluence rate at the exposure site was about 60 J/cm 2 as measured by FiledMaxII Laser power/Energy Meter/Coherent/USA. The distance between the sample and the light source was 17 cm. The appropriate spot size of light source that covers the sample area was focused and collimated by a convex lens.
Preparation of solutions
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) (Solution A): One pellet of PBS was dissolved with 200 ml of distilled water (Sigma-Aldrich p4417-100AB, USA). A stirrer was used until the tablet completely dissolved.
Cichorium pumilum (C.P.)
A concentration of 10 mg/ml of the Cichorium pumilum (C.P.) has been prepared by dissolving 10 mg of the extracts with 1 ml of the PBS. Solution was exposed to ultrasonic action for 5 min with stirring continuously to completely dissolve the extract in the PBS solution. The concentration of C.P. in the samples is 2 mg/ml.
Drawing ink solution (Solution B)
Drawing Ink Solution was prepared by adding small amount of the ink to distilled water. The amount of the drawing ink was increased until the absorption factor reaches 0.18 at 500 nm wavelength.  The concentration of drawing ink in the samples is 0.02 mg/ml.
Red blood cells
Fresh blood samples from healthy volunteer donor were collected and washed out by PBS, pH 7.4. Mixture then left for 8 minutes spinning in a centrifugation 1500×g, at room temperature. This process was repeated at least three times to get colorless supernatants. Washed cells were diluted with PBS to get optical density equal to or less than 0.9 at 500 nm. 
Preparation of the artificial tissue phantom
A total volume of about 100 ml sample of similar optical properties of the esophageal wall in human was prepared: 2 grams of agar (that do not have an effect on the visible spectrum) had been dissolved in 40 ml of the PBS solution and 40 ml of distilled water. The solution was heated up to boiling point to make sure that the agar is dissolved totally. A stirrer with small magnet inside the sample was used to keep the sample homogenous. Solution was left to cool alone and free the bubbles out. As the solution cool down between (70 and 80°C), 3 g of silica powder is added of 45 micrometer in diameter to the solution and then the solution is placed in ultrasonic path for 5 min to discard the crusts of this material. At 45°C, 1 ml of solution B, 20 ml of bovine serum, and 0.2 ml of Intralipid is added, then the solution cooled down to 40°C. Finally, 1.5 ml of concentrated blood, photosensitive material (Cichorium Pumilum) on concentration of 2 mg/ml, and 1 ml of penicillin streptomycin were added. To obtain slices of the prepared artificial phantom, the glass slides of 0.85 mm empty in-between gap were immersed inside the final solution. The separation gap was maintained by small magnet strips of 0.85 mm (sample thickness) between the upper and lower edges.
The role of various composites in the phantom
Six important materials were used in this experiment. Most of the concentrations and the method used in this work were reported by Bashkatov et al. The concentration and the role of each composite are as follows:
Ink and blood
The Indian ink and blood are the optical absorbers. As different ink batches from the manufacturer may differ in their optical properties, Ink and blood were diluted to have absorbance value of 0.18 and 0.9, respectively, at λ =500 nm.
Silica powder and the intralipid
The silica powder and the Intralipid are responsible for light scattering. Silica Powder (FIZMERK an ISO 9001-2000 Certified Company, Fizmerk India Chemicals. India) prepared with concentration of 30 mg/ml, intralipid (SIGMA-ALDRICH, L141, 117k07251) with concentration of 0.2%.
The role of the bovine serum is to have proteins in the phantom. The optical properties (absorption and scattering) of the serum do not play a significant role in the overall optical coefficients of the phantom.  (SIGMA-ALDRICH)
(SIGMA-ALDRICH p4333, 057k2411). The penicillin of 1% concentration in the sample was used to prevent contamination and insure the long time protection of such phantoms. 
(GAINLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY, 00310). Agar with a concentration of 20 mg/ml in the samples is a typical media used to contain all other materials to perform the artificial semi-rigid tissue. Agar was used as a reference and has been approved to have no significant effects on our reading due to its optical and chemical properties. Artificial tissue made of agar only was used as a background correction. 
(SIGMA-ALDRICH, p4417, 036k8200). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with pH 7.4 is a substance that is used to maintain the red blood cells and to prevent the rupture of the Red blood cells (RBCs) membrane.
| Determination of the optical properties|| |
The objective of this research is to study the optical properties of the artificial tissue phantom. The main parameters measured in this work are absorption coefficient K and the scattering coefficient S. Moreover, the potential use of extracted photosensitizer C.P. is one of the main investigated goals. The variations of K and S with exposure time to light in the presence of C.P. were investigated. The variation of transmittance T with the thickness d has also been investigated.
K/S, S, and K versus exposure time
One sample with concentration (2.0 mg/ml) of C.P. and with thickness 0.85 mm was prepared. The spectra of R and T have been measured at different exposure times, and the values of K/S, S, and K were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation for each R and T.
Variation of transmittance versus thickness
In this part the transmittance has been measured with variation of the thickness at different wavelengths (400, 500, 600, 630 and 700 nm). The values of linear attenuation coefficient μatt and half value layer (HVL) at different wavelengths were measured. Five samples were prepared with fixed concentration of 2 mg/ml of C.P. The half value layer HVL and the attenuation coefficients μatt are plotted versus wavelength.
Kubelka-Munk theory is considered to be one of the most acceptable theories in optical tissue calculations. The most important and fundamental parameters in soft biological tissues are absorption coefficient K and scattering coefficient S. To calculate these values the reflectance (R) and transmittance (T) of the tissue must be measured. Kubelka-Munk theory relates the scattering coefficient S and the absorption coefficient K directly with the measured reflectance (R) and transmittance T as follows:
where d is the sample thickness and
The optical penetration depth (δ) can be calculated by using the values of S and K in the following well-known equation. 
where g is the average cosine of the scattering angle; the value of g has a maximum value of +1 for the entirely forward direction and has a minimum value of -1 for entirely backward scattering. The typical value of g for soft tissues varies from 0.7 to 0.9. Therefore, the reduced scattering coefficient is defined as S / = S
Beer-Lambert Law: The differential decrease of light intensity in the medium due to absorption is proportional to the intensity I and elementary distance traveled by the light
μ is the linear attenuation coefficient of absorber at incident wavelength.
I is the intensity of light at depth d.
I o is the intensity of light at depth d = 0.
If we introduce the transmittance in terms of thickness
we can rewrite Beer-Lambert Law as
New approach for calculating the optical penetration depth (δ): The optical penetration depth δ can be obtained from the experimental data based on Beer-Lambert's absorption law:
This method of calculation depends on the assumption that the slope of the linear plots of ln(1/T) vs. d represents the effective linear attenuation coefficient.  Therefore, only measurements of transmittance (T) vs. thickness d is required. Two sets of samples were prepared to measure the absorption and scattering coefficients. The first set contains all the composites in the tissue phantom along with absorbers materials (ink + blood + C.P.) except the scattering materials (silica powder, intralipid). The slope ln(1/T) vs. d obtained from this set of samples is an effective linear absorption coefficient (μ a ). The second set contains all the composites in the tissue phantom along with scattering materials (silica powder, intralipid) except the absorbing materials (ink + blood). The slope of ln(1/T) vs. d obtained from this set of samples is an effective linear scattering coefficient (μ s ).  Therefore, effective attenuation coefficient (μ att ) inside the tissue could carry useful information about the tissue based on its composites. The effective attenuation coefficient is proportional to the density of the scattering particles. 
Thus, the values of K and S can be replaced by μ a and μ s , respectively, and therefore equation (1) can be written as:
Define the reduced scattering coefficient μ s' = μ s (1 - g), therefore, equation (5) can be written as
The validity of two methods of calculation was conformed.
| Results|| |
The interaction of light with matter in a single or multi-layered system described by Kubelka-Munk theory is the most acceptable model, which is based on measuring the diffuse reflectance and transmittance of the beam. The scattering and absorption coefficients, S and K, respectively, were calculated from the ratio of K/S. Another approach of calculating the optical penetration depth led to good agreement with those calculated by using Kubelka-Munk theory.
Plots of K/S, S, and K versus the exposure time single layer of tissue phantom
The diffuse reflectance R and transmittance T were measured and the values K/S, S, and K were calculated by using Monte Carlo simulation. These values were plotted as a function of wavelength at different exposure times.
[Figure 1] shows the variation of K/S with wavelength λ at different exposure times for time intervals of 0 min, 10 min, 25 min, 45 min, and 70 min. The flat portion of the curve starts at nearly 500 nm wavelength. The values of K/S at λ = 630 nm for unexposed sample (t = 0 min) is 1.2 and for exposed sample of exposure time of 70 min. K/S at λ = 630 nm is 0.7. As the exposure time increase the ratio K/S decrease.
|Figure 1: Variation of calculated K/S vs. wavelength, sample with 0.85 mm thickness of 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. exposed at different exposure time|
Click here to view
The scattering coefficient S at 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. is shown in [Figure 2]. It shows the variation of S with wavelength λ at different exposure times of time intervals of 0 min., 10, 25, 45, and 70 min. Where S is maximum at λ = 500 nm. The maximum value for zero exposure time is 0.215 and for 70 min. exposure time is 0.189.
|Figure 2: Variation of calculated scattering coefficient S vs. wavelength, sample with 0.85 mm thickness of 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. exposed at different exposure time at room temp|
Click here to view
[Figure 3] shows the variation of K with wavelength λ by measuring the reflectance R and the transmittance T at different exposure times of time intervals of 0, 10, 25, 45, and 70 min. The curves of K change the direction of the gradients at 450 nm wavelength. The absorption coefficient decreases as the exposure time increases.
|Figure 3: Variation of calculated absorption coefficient K vs. wavelength, sample with 0.85 mm thickness of 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. exposed at different exposure time at room temp|
Click here to view
[Figure 4] represents the typical curves of absorption and scattering coefficients vs. wavelength at zero exposure time.
|Figure 4: Absorption coefficient K and scattering coefficient S vs. wavelength, sample with 0.85 mm thickness for 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. without irradiation|
Click here to view
Plots of K/S, S, and K versus the exposure time for 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. with multilayer
In this part, multilayer were used with samples incorporated with 2.0 mg/ml C.P. The values of transmittance and diffuse reflectance were measured and the value of K/S, S, K, were calculated.
The variation of transmittance (T) with wavelength (λ): In this part we studied the variation of T vs. the wavelength at different tissue thicknesses.
[Figure 5] illustrates the typical variation of transmittance beam T with different wavelength λ at different thickness for unexposed sample. (sample 4: Concentration = 2.0 mg/ml of C.P, 1 ml of drawing ink, 1.5 ml of red blood cells, 3 g of silica powder, 0.2 ml Intralipid).
|Figure 5: The percentage of transmittance (T) vs. wavelength at different thickness for 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. without irradiation|
Click here to view
Linear attenuation coefficient (μatt) and half-value layer (HVL) versus wavelength: The optical penetration depth of tissue when C.P., Scatter, Absorber are incorporated individually or together in the tissue phantoms were investigated. All photobiology are initiated by light interaction with tissue. The nature of interactions and photo effects depend on the biological and optical properties of the tissue as well as the power of the light. Light is strongly attenuated inside the tissue. In addition to T and R, two processes of interaction might take place inside tissue during attenuation; 1 - Absorption which converts the energy from one form to another, such as heat, luminescence, and/or chemical energy. 2 - Light scattering which changes the direction of the light rays without any loss of intensity.
Half value layer (HVL) is the depth of tissue at which the beam intensity decays to half of its initial value. In [Figure 6], ln(T) has been plotted vs. the tissue thickness d in a semi-log scale, the dot points represent the values of experimental data and the lines represent the fitting of these data to a straight line equation. At T = 0.5 the values of HVL are obtained at different wavelengths. We have found that the HVL in the tissue phantom is increasing with increasing the wavelength. Also from the same figure [Figure 6], we have calculated the effective linear attenuation coefficient (μatt). We have found that the value of (μatt) is decreasing with increasing the wavelength; data are shown in [Table 1].
|Figure 6: Semi-log scale of T vs. depth in tissue phantom for 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. at room temperature with different wavelengths. Dot points are the experimental data points and the solid lines are the straight line fitting|
Click here to view
|Table 1: Values of μatt and (1/μatt) for different samples (samples with all components plus 2.0 mg/ml C.P. with samples irradiation time intervals (0-45 min.)|
Click here to view
[Figure 7] shows the variation of wavelengths vs. the linear attenuation coefficient μatt and the half value layer HVL for the 2.0 mg/ml sample.
|Figure 7: Variation of attenuation coefficient, ° μatt (mm-1) and • solid circle HVL (mm) of tissue sample with 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. at room temperature vs. wavelength (nm)|
Click here to view
The reciprocal of 1/μ att is approximately equal to the penetration depth in which a collimated light beam is attenuated. The actual penetration of light inside tissue is deeper than 1/μ att due to forward scattering beam. [Table 1] and [Table 2] review the values of effective linear attenuation coefficients with different irradiation times for different composites. The optical penetration depth has been calculated on the bases of Kubelka-Munk theory using Eq. 1. Another approach for calculating the optical penetration depth can be approximated by using Eq. 5 where the values of μαand μ s are used instead of K and S. The value of (μα) is the fraction of radiation absorbed for different sample contents per unit thickness of the absorber and (μ s ) is the linear scattering coefficient defined as the factor that expresses the attenuation caused by scatter materials. In this part we have calculated μα of the absorber composites (Blood and Ink) incorporated with the phantom tissue and μ s were calculated for the scatter composites (Silica powder and Intralipid) incorporated with phantom tissue, and also we have calculated the linear attenuation coefficient μ Agar of the agar material. The comparisons between the two approaches with other parameters are listed in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Linear absorption coefficient of ink and blood (μa) and linear scattering coefficient of silica powder and Intralipid (μs) are the slopes of the linear plots of ln(1/T) vs. thickness. Comparison of the optical penetration depth δ obtained from Lambert-Beer's absorption law and K-M theory. The data obtained in this table from unexposed samples|
Click here to view
Figure shows a plot of ln(1/T) with tissue thickness (d) for the tissue phantoms at specific wavelength (λ = 630 nm) to show the linearity of ln(1/T) as a function of depth. [Table 3] illustrates the values of the ratio K/S for thick samples of d=4.25 mm. The calculation is based on the assumption that the sample is thick enough so that the transmission of the light as shown in [Figure 5]
|Table 3: Comparisons between the values of K/S calculated at maximum thickness d=4.25 mm from R and T and the one calculated assuming thick samples with T = 0.|
Click here to view
is negligible (0 to 7%). The values of K/S calculated from the measured values of R and T are in good agreement with the values calculated from the measured value of R only and T=0.
| Discussion|| |
Calculated S and K at different C.P. concentration with one layer
Most biological tissues are very non-homogeneous and the probability of scattering and absorption in spite of transmission and reflection are still considered to be very high. The distribution of light and light propagation inside biological tissue will remain ambiguous and subject of interest. The penetration of light inside any biological tissue can be expressed in terms of radiation passes through the tissue. Penetration is the inverse of attenuation. Generally speaking, increasing photon irradiation decreases the probability of interaction (attenuation) and hence increasing the probability of penetration.
Therefore, all the photons that have traveled a few tenth of a millimeter into the tissue subjected to multiple scattering and will reach a molecule from all directions. These results are almost isotropic light distributions in the region distal to the surface, thus allowing the use of another approach instead of diffusion theory in describing the propagation of light inside the tissue. Scattering of light by particles inside most of the tissues occurred when the wavelength of light are comparable to or greater than the dimensions of the composites. When light photons are scattered by molecules in the medium, the energy of the photon is not changed significantly.
The values of K/S related to the samples incorporated with 2.0 mg/ml of photosensitizer C.P. show a rapid decrease with increasing wavelength from 400 nm up to nearly 450 nm, followed by constant plateau shape from about 500 nm to 700 nm [Figure 1]. [Figure 2] represent the sample containing 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. that shows a slight reduction of scattering coefficient at the maximum peaks (range 0.22 to 0.19 mm -1 ) and the values of maximum peaks decreases with increasing irradiation time. The values of scattering coefficient calculated from the transmission found by (Wei Sun, et al., 1992) with phantoms incorporated with different concentration of Intralipid are (0.99-1.73 mm -1 ) which is comparable to those calculated by diffuse reflectance range (0.98-1.63 mm -1 ).
The values of K related to the samples incorporated with 2.0 mg/ml of photosensitizer C.P. show rapid decrease by increasing the wavelength from 400 nm up to nearly 475 nm [Figure 3]. The curves followed by almost constant plateau shape with slight decrease from about 500 nm to 700 nm. Interestingly, at 630 nm it has been found that the ratio K/S decreases with increasing irradiation time and decreases with decreasing K and S.
Calculation of S and K with multilayer
The values of K/S are independent of thicknesses at different wavelengths while the values of K/S decrease with increasing irradiation time [Table 4]. The values of S are found to be independent of thickness and irradiation time [Table 5]. In contrast; with the case of one-layer samples the values are dependent on irradiation time, and that could be attributed to homogeneity of the one thin layer. The values of K are found to be independent of thickness but dependent on irradiation time [Table 6]. Similar approach by Kumar et al. reports that the emergence of the backscattered radiation from the deeper layers at various locations of the surface from the beam entry point is unaffected by the optical parameters of the tissues.
|Table 4: Summary of the average values of K/S at different wavelengths at different exposure time (t = 0, 15, 30, and 45 min)|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Summary of the average values of S at different wavelengths at different exposure time (t = 0, 15, 30, and 45 min)|
Click here to view
|Table 6: Summary of the average value of absorption coefficient K at different wavelengths of 2.0 mg/ml of C.P. at different exposure time (t = 0, 15, 30, and 45 min)|
Click here to view
The variation of transmittance T with wavelength for multilayer samples: The typical curves of transmittance T vs. wavelength λ and thickness d are shown in [Figure 2]. The slight fluctuations shown in the curves could not be defiantly clarified, but most probably could be due to the inhomogeneous tissue phantom or inhomogeneous light beam passes through the tissue phantom. 
A beam with higher (m) would be more likely to interact and could have a smaller HVL and its intensity is reduced and this can be seen clearly in [Figure 8]. Previous works show similar plots of Half Value Layer (HVL) and attenuation coefficient μ where HVL increases with decreasing μ. 
|Figure 8: Variation of ln(1/T) versus tissue thickness d (mm) for different samples at λ = 630 nm: Line (1) for sample contains ink, blood, agar, penicillin, C.P. and bovine serum. Line (2) for sample contains silica powder, Intralipid, agar, penicillin, C.P. and bovine serum. Line (3) for sample contains ink, blood, silica powder, intralipid, agar, penicillin, and bovine serum (without C.P.). Line (4) for sample contains agar, penicillin, and bovine serum only|
Click here to view
The optical penetration depth in all biological tissues at 630 nm ranges from 0.1 to 3 mm. ,
The optical penetration depth has been calculated on the bases of Kubelka-Munk theory using Eq. 1. Another approach for calculating the optical penetration depth can be approximated by using Eq. 5 where the values of μαand μ s are used instead of K and S. The value of (μα) is the fraction of radiation absorbed for different sample contents per unit thickness of the absorber and (μ s ) is the linear scattering coefficient defined as the factor that expresses the attenuation caused by scatter materials. In this part we have calculated μα of the absorber composites (Blood and Ink) incorporated with the phantom tissue, and μ s is calculated for the scatter composites (Silica powder and Intralipid) incorporated with phantom tissue, and also we have calculated the linear attenuation coefficient μ Agar of the agar material. The comparisons between the two approaches; values of the optical penetration depth using Eq. 1 and values of the optical penetration depth using Eq. 5 are in very good agreement [Table 2]. Furthermore, the values of 1/μ att represent the average range defined as the distance traveled by the photons inside the tissue phantom before interaction takes place. Photon ranges are increasing with increasing wavelength [Table 2]. The average range of a group of photons is inversely related to the effective linear attenuation coefficient. The average range of photon ranges for samples containing ink, blood, agar, penicillin, bovine serum and C.P. is from 1.613 to 6.135 mm, while for samples contain silica powder, Intralipid, agar, penicillin, bovine serum and C.P. is 1.294 to 2.288 mm, for samples contain ink, blood, silica powder, Intralipid, agar, penicillin, and bovine serum (without C.P) is from 1.587 to 1.949 mm. Finally, for samples containing agar, penicillin, and bovine serum only the photon range is 3.906 to 7.143 mm. As expected the average photon range in samples containing no scattering and no absorbing materials are about three times greater than those containing scattering materials. Similarly with samples containing absorbing materials (without scattering materials) are comparable to those containing agar, penicillin, and bovine serum only. Furthermore, the validity of our results can be seen from the good agreement between the values of K/S (calculated from the measured values of R and T) with the values calculated from the measured value of R only (assuming T is zero) [Table 3].
| Conclusions|| |
The optical parameters measured at various conditions and calculated by various technique represent the behavior of light propagation in tissue phantom. The probability of interaction of light with tissue is very high when exposed to light in present of C.P. and RBCs followed by photohemolysis or/and photo-degradation. Therefore, the values of absorption coefficient decrease from 0.65 to 0.13 mm -1 . The conclusions of this work can be summarized as follows:
The values of K/S show rapid decrease with increasing wavelength from 400 nm up to nearly 450 nm, followed by constant plateau shape from about 500 nm to 700 nm.
The values of K/S are independent of thickness and the values of K/S decrease with increasing irradiation time.
The values of K are independent of thickness and depend on irradiation time.
The values of S are independent of thickness and irradiation time.
The average photon range in the samples contains no scattering and absorbing materials are about three times greater than those samples containing scattering materials.
HVL in the tissue phantom is increasing with increasing wavelengths.
The value of (μ att ) is decreasing with increasing the wavelength.
Light propagation with the optical properties presented in this work could be applicable in diagnostic and therapeutic of human biological tissue for photodynamic therapy.
Very good agreement between the two approaches of calculating the optical penetration depth.
| Acknowledgments|| |
This work was funded by the Scientific Research Faculty, grant # 80-2008 and partially by higher council for science and technology/Jordan., grant # 62/2000.
| References|| |
|1.||Welch AJ, Van Germert MJ, Star WM, Wilson BC. Overview of tissue optics. Optical Thermal Response of Laser Irradiated Tissue. 1 st ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1995. p. 233. |
|2.||Star WF. Light dosimetry in vivo. Phys Med Biol 1997;42:763-87. |
|3.||Shanthi S, Singh M. Laser reflectance imaging of mammalian organs under in vitro conditions. Innov Technol Biol Med 1996;17:443-51. |
|4.||Fantini S, Walker SA, Franceschini MA, Kaschke M, Schlag PM, Moesta KT. Assessment of the size, position, and optical properties of breast tumors in vivo by non invasive optical methods. Appl Opt 1998;37:1982-9. |
|5.||Ping Sun, Yu Wang. Measurements of optical parameters of phantom solution and bulk animal tissues in vitro at 650 nm. Opt Laser Technol 2010;42:1-7. |
|6.||Cheong WF, Prahl SA, Welch AJ. A review of the optical properties of biological tissues. IEEE J Quantum Electron 1990;26:2166-85. |
|7.||Kessel D, Dougherty J. Agents used in photodynamic therapy. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 1999;10:19-24 |
|8.||Kubler AC. Photodynamic therapy. Med Laser Appl 2005;20:37-45. |
|9.||AL-Akhras M, Amin A, Mohammed K, Al-Haddad F, Hamza A. In vitro studies on the effect of phototoxicity of a new photosensitizer extracted from flowers and aerial parts of Cichorium Pumilum. Am J Pharm Toxcicol 2007;6:39-45. |
|10.||Barry TN, Hoskin SO, Wilson PR. Novel forages for growth and health in farmed deer. NZ Vet J 2002;50:244-51. |
|11.||Marley CL, Cook R, Keatinge R, Barrett J, Lampkin NH. The effect of birds foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and chicory (Cichorium Pumilum) on parasite intensities and performance of lambs naturally-infected with helminthes parasites. Vet Parasitol 2003;112:147-55. |
|12.||Marley C, Cook R, Barrett R, Keatinge R, Lampkin NH. The effects of birds foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and chicory (Cichorium Pumilum) when compared with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on ovine gastrointestinal parasite development, survival and migration. Vet Parasitol 2006;138:280-90. |
|13.||Al-Akhras M, Amin A, Mohammed K, Al-Haddad F, Hamza A. Sensitization of photohemolysis by a new extraction from flowers and aerial parts of Cichorium Pumilum Jacq: Effect of Inulin and Hydrogen Peroxide. Am J Pharm Toxcicol 2007;2:75-9. |
|14.||Hartwell JL. Plants used against cancer. A survey. Lloydia 1967;30:379-436. |
|15.||Amin A, Mousa M. Merits of anti-cancer plants from the Arabian Gulf region. Cancer Ther 2007;5:55-66. |
|16.||Hazra B, Sarkar R, Bhattacharyya S, Roy P. Tumour inhibitory activity of chicory root extract against Ehrlich ascites arcinoma in mice. Fitoterapia 2002;73:730-3. |
|17.||Harborne J. The coumarins of Solanum pinnatisectum. Plant Polyphenols 1960;74:270-3. |
|18.||Biscoff TA, Kelley CJ, Karchesy Y, Laurantos M, Nguyen-Dinh P, Arefi A. Antimalarial activity of Lactucin and Lactucopicrin: Sesquiterpene Lactones Isolated from Cichorium Intybus L. J Ethnopharmacol 2004;95:455-7. |
|19.||Frey U, Claude J, Crelier S, Juillert M. UV degradation of sesquiterpene lactones in Chicory extract kinetics and identification of reaction products by HPLC-MS. Chmia 2002;56:292-3. |
|20.||Pickering JW, Prahl SA, Van wieringen N, Beek JF, Steren borg HJ, Van Gemert MJ. Double-integrating-sphere system for measuring the optical properties of tissue. Appl Opt 1993;32:399-410. |
|21.||Chen W, Liu R, Luo Y, Han Y, Xu K. Preliminary study of mechanism of non- invasive blood glucose measurement based on near-infrared diffuse reflectance. Proc SPIE 2005;5696:91-100. |
|22.||Wilson BC, Patterson MS. The physics of photodynamic therapy. Phys Med Biol 1986;26:327-60. |
|23.||Tromberg BJ, Svaasand LO, Fehr MK, Madsen SJ, Wyss P, Sasone B, et al. Mathematic model for light dosimetery in photodynamic destruction of human endometrium. Phys Med Biol 1996;41:233-7. |
|24.||Kumar D, Srinivasan R, Singh M. Optical characterization of mammalian tissues by laser reflectometry and Monte Carlo simulation. Med Eng Phys 2004;26:363-9. |
|25.||Di Rocco HO, Iriarte DI, Pomarico JA, Ranea Sandoval HF, Macdonald R, Voigt J. Determination of optical properties of slices of turbid media by diffuse CW laser light scattering profilometry. J Quant Spectrosc Ra 2007;105:68-83. |
|26.||Roy SC, Kissel L, Pratt RH. Elastic scattering of photons. Radiat Phys Chem 1999;56:3-26. |
|27.||Kevin JP. Ultrasonic attenuation and absorptionin liver tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol 1983;9:363-9. |
|28.||Prahl SA, van Gemert MJ, Welch AJ. Determining the optical properties of turbid mediaby using the adding-doubling method. Appl Opt 1993;32:559. |
|29.||Hammer M, Roggan A, Schweitzer D, Muller G. Optical properties of ocular fundus tissues-an in vitro study using the double-integrating-sphere technique and inverse Monte Carlo simulation. Phys Med Biol 1995;40:963. |
|30.||Roggan A, Schadel D, Netz U, Ritz JP, Germer CT, Muller G. Radiation Planning for Thermal Laser Treatment. Appl Phys B 1999;69:445. |
|31.||Jacques SL. Optical assessment of cutaneous blood volume depends on the vessel size distribution: A computer simulation study. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 1989;36:1155. |
|32.||Patterson MS, Chance B, Wilson BC. Time resolved reflectance and transmittance for the non-invasive measurement of tissue optical properties. Appl Optics 1989;28:2331. |
|33.||Gonatas CP, Miwa M, Ishii M, Schotland J, Chance B, Leigh JS. Real time optical coefficients evaluation from time and space resolved reflectance measurements in biological tissues. SPIE 1993;1888:402. |
|34.||Wagnières G, Cheng S, Zellweger M, Utke N, Braichotte D, Ballini JP, et al. An optical phantom with tissue-like properties in the visible for use in PDT and fluorescence spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol 1997;42:1415-26. |
|35.||Bashkatov AN, Genina EA, Kochubey VI, Gavrilova AA, Kapralov SV, Grishaev VA, et al. Optical properties of human stomach mucosa in the spectral range from 400 to 2000 nm: Prognosis for gastroenterology. Med Laser Appl 2007;22:95-104. |
|36.||Wierman ME, Kepa JK, Sun W, Gordon DF, Wood WM. Estrogen negatively regulates rat gonadotropin releasing hormone (rGnRH) promoter activity in transfected placental cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1992;86:1-10. |
|37.||Chernova S, Pravdin A, Sinichkin Y, Tuchin V, Vari S. Optics and Lasers in Biomedical Culture. In: Fotakis C, Papazoglou T, Kalpouzos C, editors. Contributions to the Fifth International Conference on Optics Within Life Scienes OWLS V Crete, Octobor 13-16, 1998 .1 st ed. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 301. |
|38.||Minet O, Beuthan J, Zabarylo U. Deconvolution techniques for experimental optical imaging in medicine. Med. Laser Appl 2008;23:216-25. |
|39.||Al-Akhras MH, Aljarrah K, Al-Omari A, Al-Khateeb HM, Albiss BA, Azez K, et al. Influence of extremely low energy radiation on artificial tissue: Effects on image quality and superficial dose. Spectroscopy 2008;22:499-504. |
|40.||Savaasand L, Gomer C. Optics in Tissue. Int Soc Opt Eng IS 1989;5:114-32. |
|41.||Stolik S, Delgado JA, Pe´rez A, Anasagasti L. Measurement of the penetration depths of red and near infrared light in human ''ex vivo'' tissues. J Photochem Photobiol B 2000;57:90-3. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]