Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 5076  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
DENTAL SCIENCE - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 136-138  

Appraisal of the cephalometric norms for the upper and lower lips of the South Indian ethnic population


1 Department of Orthodontics, JKK Natrajah Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Oral Surgery, JKK Natrajah Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, JKK Natrajah Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission01-Dec-2011
Date of Decision02-Jan-2012
Date of Acceptance26-Jan-2012
Date of Web Publication28-Aug-2012

Correspondence Address:
Neetika Mukhija Prabu
Department of Orthodontics, JKK Natrajah Dental College and Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.100215

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Aim: The guidelines for planning an improvement in the facial appearance till recently existed in the form of evaluation of linear and angular parameters and ratios related to the hard tissues in the various cephalometric analyses. The present study aimed at establishing Arnett et al.'s norms of the upper and lower lip for the local population and assessing the extent by which these differ from the original norms proposed by Arnett et al. Materials and Methods: Forty pretreatment lateral cephalograms (20 males and 20 females) with normal occlusion and well-balanced face were chosen for this study. Upper and lower lip lengths, thicknesses, and chin thickness were all measured according to soft tissue cephalometric analysis by Arnett et al. Results: The obtained data were statistically analyzed and compared with other studies. Conclusion: Males had thicker and longer upper and lower lips when compared to females, but they were comparatively thinner than the results of Arnett et al. Females had more interlabial gap than males. The difference in soft tissue parameters in different ethnic groups shows the importance of defining what is optimal for a particular group.

Keywords: Chin thickness, soft tissue cephalometric analysis, upper and lower lips


How to cite this article:
Prabu NM, Kohila K, Sivaraj S, Prabu PS. Appraisal of the cephalometric norms for the upper and lower lips of the South Indian ethnic population. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2012;4, Suppl S2:136-8

How to cite this URL:
Prabu NM, Kohila K, Sivaraj S, Prabu PS. Appraisal of the cephalometric norms for the upper and lower lips of the South Indian ethnic population. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2022 Aug 14];4, Suppl S2:136-8. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2012/4/6/136/100215

Facial attractiveness influences personality development and social interactions. People mainly focus on another person's eyes and mouth during interpersonal interactions, with little time spent on other facial features. Soft tissues are the most important aspect in orthodontic treatment planning and cephalometrics plays an important role to quantify this.

With the knowledge of standard facial traits and the patient's soft tissue features, an individualized norm can be established for each patient to optimize facial attractiveness. Over the years, several lines and angles have been used to evaluate soft tissue facial esthetics. Most of these analyses had the disadvantage that the horizontal reference planes taken were either the Frankfort horizontal plane or the cranial base, the orientation of which could differ significantly from person to person. The vertical reference planes, which were related to the above horizontal planes, were obviously unreliable. Soft tissue mid-face landmarks were not given proper importance. To overcome these shortcomings, Arnett et al. [1] developed a new method of cephalometric analysis in the year 1999, which assessed the patient from their soft tissue measurements for altering the dento-alveolar as well as skeletal components. The analysis has the added advantage that it is based on natural head position (NHP). They specified a true vertical line (TVL) as the vertical reference plane to measure the soft tissue norms. Hence, this analysis has proved useful in planning strategies for both orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment. It is essential to establish the norms for local population based on Arnett et al.'s [1] cephalometric analysis as it may be inappropriate to apply directly the values of Arnett's analysis to local population because it is a known fact that facial features of different ethnic groups differ significantly.

Lip and chin form an important component of the oro-facial soft tissue profile. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis (STCA) analysis by Arnett et al. [1] is used in this study to establish the normal lip and chin parameters for the local population.


   Materials and Methods Top


The present study was conducted on lateral cephalograms of 40 subjects (20 males and 20 females) of 18 years and above. The following criteria were used in the selection of the total sample:

  1. Full permanent dentition regardless of the third molars
  2. No history of previous orthodontic treatment
  3. No history of facial trauma or craniofacial disorder, such as cleft palate
  4. Class I occlusion with normal overjet and overbite
  5. Acceptable facial profile
  6. Bilateral Class I buccal segments "molar and canine"
  7. Skeletal Class I relationship determined
  8. Minor or no spacing or crowding.
All lateral head films were obtained with subjects in NHP with seated condyles and passive lips. After placing registration points on the cephalograms, the pretreatment radiographs were traced on acetate tracing sheets of 0.5 μm thickness using a sharp 4H pencil on a view box using transilluminated light in a dark room. When there was a lack of superimposition of the right and left structural outline, the average between the two was drawn by inspection and the cephalometric points were located in reference to the arbitrary line so obtained.


   Cephalometric analysis Top


The TVL was positioned through subnasale and was perpendicular to the natural horizontal head position. [2]

Arnett et al.'s [1] soft tissue cephalometric analysis was used to diagnose the subjects for the following parameters [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]:
Figure 1: Soft tissue thickness at upper lip, lower lip, pogonion and menton are depicted

Click here to view
Figure 2: Upper lip length (ULL), lower lip length (LLL) and interlabial gap (ILG) are depicted

Click here to view


  1. Upper lip thickness (mm)
  2. Lower lip thickness (mm)
  3. Pogonion-pogonion' (mm)
  4. Menton-menton' (mm)
  5. Upper lip length (mm)
  6. Lower lip length (mm)
  7. Interlabial gap (mm)

   Results Top


The results were statistically analyzed for mean and standard deviation. The P values of <0.05 and <0.01 were considered statistically significant.

Means, standard deviation, and significance values were as follows:

  1. The mean upper lip thickness for men was 14.01±1.3 and for women 12.09±1.8, with a P value of 0.05.
  2. The mean lower lip thickness for women was 14.6±2.24 and for women was 13.24±1.43, with a P value of 0.01.
  3. The upper lip length measured showed a mean of 23.4±3.42 for men and 20.02±2.89 for women, with a P value of 0.01.
  4. The lower lip length was 49.83±5.2 for males and 41.27±7.08 for females, with a P value of 0.01.
  5. The interlabial gap for women was 1.62±1.8 and for men was 0.24±1.1, with a P value of 0.01.
  6. The chin thickness measured was established by the values of hard tissue pogonion to soft tissue pogonion, with mean values of 13.32±1.8 for men and 12.09±1.09 for women, with a P value of 0.001.
  7. The value for the menton-menton' was 8.64±2.15 for men and 7.18±2.30 for women, with a P value of 0.01.

   Discussion Top


Soft tissues like lips and the chin are closely related to the dentition and being partially composed of the muscles therefore has a functional influence on the underlying dental structures. According to Subtelny, [3] the vermillion aspect of the lips tends to maintain a close postural relationship to their supporting structures. The most dramatic changes in the facial appearance seem to be correlated with cases exhibiting lip protrusions whether it is one or both the lips. With the lips forming a very important part of the face, modifications in this area can have a dramatic influence on the facial appearance. With lot of emphasis given on the cephalometric analysis, it is essential to know ethnically specific lip features of the group an orthodontist usually treats. In our study, we evaluated the lip features of the Komarapalayam population on the lateral cephalogram using STCA of Arnett et al. [1] In this study, upper and lower lip thickness, length, interlabial gap, and the chin thickness were measured.

In this study, the upper and lower lips and soft tissue chin were found to be thinner than that reported by Arnett et al. [1] and were nearly the same as that reported by Kalha et al. [4] This may be attributed to the ethnic factor or sample size. From the results, it can be seen that upper lip length, lower lip length, upper lip thickness, lower lip thickness, pogonion-pogonion', and menton-menton' were significantly greater in males than in females; this comes in agreement with the reports of Arnett et al., [1] Kalha et al., [4] Uysal et al., [5] Lalitha and Kumar, [6] and Zainab. [7]

The interlabial gap was higher for female group as compared with the males. This is in accordance with the reports of Arnett et al., [4] Kalha et al., [4] and Lalitha and Kumar, [6] whereas Uysal et al.'s [5] finding is not in agreement with this. In this study, all the parameters are lower than those reported by Arnett et al., [1] but in accordance with the reports of Kalha et al. [4] and Lalitha and Kumar, [6] as their studies were also based on almost similar ethnic group.

This study emphasizes the importance of the lips in treatment planning, especially where intrusion or retraction of incisors is planned. Soft tissue camouflage is the nature's way of treating malocclusion and this should be considered and respected when planning for orthodontic treatment. The sexual differences are due to the influence of the sex hormones on the facial contour, which become very evident by adolescence. The male bony structure is bolder and more prominent, with dominance of the forehead, nose, chin, and stronger contour of the mandible. [8] This comes with the general trend of males having greater measurements than females. This is because males have longer growth period than females [9],[10],[11]


   Conclusion Top


Males have thicker soft tissue structures, especially lower lip thickness. Since the reduction in lip prominence (with the same amount of incisor retraction) is less in the individuals with thick lips than in those with average thickness of lips, the difference in male and female lip thickness will have to be considered while planning the amount of incisor retraction for improving esthetics. The difference in soft tissue parameters in different ethnic groups shows the importance of defining what is optimal for a particular group. In the Western population, straight profile with a prominent chin is considered normal and esthetic, whereas mild convexity in the Indian scenario is considered normal.

 
   References Top

1.Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM Jr, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:139-253.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Spradley FL, Jacobs JD, Crowe DP. Assessment of the anteroposterior soft- tissue contour of the lower facial third in the ideal young adult. Am J Orthod 1981;79:316-25.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Subtelny JD. The soft tissue profile, Growth and treatment changes. Angle Orthod 1961:31:105-22.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Kalha AS, Latif A, Govardhan SN. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:876-81.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:449-56.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Lalitha Ch, Kumar KGG. Assessment of Arnett soft tissue cephalometric norms in Indian (Andhra) population. The Orthod Cyber J 2010.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Zainab M, Al-Janabi MF. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms for a sample of Iraqi adults with class I normal occlusion in natural headposition. J Bagh College Dentistry 2011;23:161-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Powell N, Humphreys B, editors. Proportions of the aesthetic face. Thieme-Stratton; New York: 1984.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Subtelny JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structures and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structures. Am J Orthod 1959;45:481-507.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Trenouth MJ, Davies PHJ, Johnson JS. A statistical comparison of three sets of normative datafrom which to derive standards for craniofacial measurements. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:193-200.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Genecove JS, Sinclair PM, Dechow PC. Development of the nose and soft tissue profile. Angel Orthod 1990;60:191-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]


This article has been cited by
1 Substantial Improvements in Facial Morphology through Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment: A Case Report and Literature Review
Lumini?a Ligia Vaida, Bianca Maria Negru?iu, Irina Nicoleta Zetu, Abel Emanuel Moca, Simion Bran
Medicina. 2022; 58(8): 1043
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Modified lip repositioning technique to improve the smile harmony: A 3-year follow-up
Anitha Vijayarangan, Adline Vadhana, Shanmugam Muthukali, Ashwath Balachandran
Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2022; 17(1): 122
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Evaluation of Lip Position in Esthetically Pleasing Profiles Using Different Reference Lines: A Photographic Study
Shweta Pandey, Sudhir Kapoor, Sonahita Agarwal, Ivy Shukla
Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2021; 55(3): 261
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18years
Robert T. Bergman,John Waschak,Ali Borzabadi-Farahani,Neal C. Murphy
The Angle Orthodontist. 2014; 84(1): 48
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years
Bergman, R.T., Waschak, J., Borzabadi-Farahani, A., Murphy, N.C.
Angle Orthodontist. 2014; 84(1): 48-55
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
    Cephalometric an...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3839    
    Printed94    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded138    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal