|DENTAL SCIENCE - REVIEW ARTICLE
|Year : 2012 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 406-409
Treatment planning in conservative dentistry
Andamuthu Sivakumar1, Vinod Thangaswamy2, Vaiyapuri Ravi1
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Tiruchengodu, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, JKKN Dental College and Hospital, Kumarapal Ayam, India
|Date of Submission||01-Dec-2011|
|Date of Decision||02-Jan-2012|
|Date of Acceptance||26-Jan-2012|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Aug-2012|
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, Tiruchengodu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
A patient attending for treatment of a restorative nature may present for a variety of reasons. The success is built upon careful history taking coupled with a logical progression to diagnosis of the problem that has been presented. Each stage follows on from the preceding one. A fitting treatment plan should be formulated and should involve a holistic approach to what is required.
Keywords: Diagnosis, history, holistic, restorative, treatment plan
|How to cite this article:|
Sivakumar A, Thangaswamy V, Ravi V. Treatment planning in conservative dentistry. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2012;4, Suppl S2:406-9
The purpose of dental treatment is to respond to a patient's needs. Each patient, however, is as unique as a fingerprint. Treatment therefore should be highly individualized for the patient as well as the disease. 
| Treatment Planning|| |
The order of the general treatment plan has as its basis an understanding of the disease processes and their relationship to each other. Fundamental is that the diagnosed lesion be considered in context with its host, the patient, and the total environment to which it is subjected. Careful weighing of all information will lead to an authoritative opinion regarding treatment. So, a sound treatment plan [Table 1] depends on thorough patient evaluation, dentist expertise, understanding the indications and contraindications, and prediction of patient's response to treatment. An accurate prognosis for each tooth and the patient's overall dental health is central to a successful treatment plan.
- It is a carefully sequenced series of services designed to eliminate or control etiologic factor. 
- It is the schedule and sequence of the treatment, which have been outlined. 
- It is created as a response to the problem list. 
- It means developing a course of action that encompasses the ramifications and sequeale of treatment to serve patients' needs. 
- It is the blueprint for case management. 
Development of treatment plan for a patient consists of four steps:
When the database (information) is gathered, three stages must be established:
- Examination and problem identification
- Decision to recommend intervention
- Identification of treatment alternatives
- Selection of the treatment with patient's involvement. 
- Generation of the problem list (ranking the order of problems)
- Tentative treatment plan for each of the problems
- Synthesis of the tentative treatment plan into a unified detailed treatment plan. 
| Problem List|| |
The problem list is a summary listing of the patient's complaints, lesions, and conditions that warrant additional diagnostic evaluation or treatment. The problem list is organized by the priority of the problems in the judgment of the clinician. This is usually in the sequence of the chief complaint, current medical conditions, general dental problems, and specific dental lesions. 
Even when modification is necessary, the dentist is ethically and professionally responsible for providing the best level of care possible. A treatment plan is not a static list of services. Rather, it is a multiphase and dynamic series of events. Its success is determined by its suitableness to meet the patient's initial and long-term needs. Treatment planning should allow for re-evaluation and be adaptable to meet the changing needs, preferences, and health conditions of the patient. 
Order of treatment
Operative treatment generally proceeds from the most to the least involved teeth.
Sensitive teeth and areas of food impaction may also be treated early. Stability of the occlusion should be assured before proceeding with cast and esthetic crowns.
- Treatment of the chief complaint of dental pain will of course take precedence.
- Certain functional and esthetic considerations may be dealt with early in the treatment plan when indicated (broken teeth, even though not painful, will call for some treatment to relieve the patient of the discomfort of sharp margins).
Factors like operator's schedule and his experience will alter the planned order of procedure. 
Treatment plan sequencing
It is the process of scheduling the needed procedures into a time frame. Proper sequencing is a critical component of a successful treatment plan. Complex treatment plans often should be sequenced in phases, including an urgent phase, control phase, re-evaluation phase, definitive phase, and maintenance phase.  For most patients, the first three phases are accomplished as a single phase. Generally, the concept of greatest need guides the order in which treatment is sequenced. This concept dictates that what the patient needs is performed first.
The urgent phase of care begins with a thorough review of the patient's medical condition and history. So, a patient presenting with swelling, pain, bleeding, or infection should have these problems managed as soon as possible and certainly before initiation of subsequent phases.
It is meant to
This includes extractions, endodontics, periodontal debridement and scaling, occlusal adjustment as needed, caries removal, replacement/repair of defective restorations such as those with gingival overhangs, and use of caries control measures.  The goals of this phase are to remove etiologic factors and stabilize the patient's dental health.
- eliminate active disease such as caries and inflammation;
- remove conditions preventing maintenance;
- eliminate potential causes of disease, and
- begin preventive dentistry activities. 
The holding phase is the time between the control and definitive phases that allows for resolution of inflammation and time for healing. Home care habits are reinforced, motivation for further treatment is assessed, and initial treatment and pulpal responses are re-evaluated before definitive care is begun.
After the dentist reassesses initial treatment and determines the need for further care, the patient enters the corrective or definitive phase of treatment. Sequencing operative care with endodontic, periodontal, orthodontic, oral surgical, and prosthodontic treatment is essential.
This includes regular recall examinations that:
The frequency of re-evaluation examinations during the maintenance phase depends in large part on the patient's risk for dental disease:
- may reveal the need for adjustments to prevent future breakdown, and
- provide an opportunity to reinforce home care.
Actual caries risk is the extent to which a person at a particular time runs the risk of developing carious leision. 
- A patient who has stable periodontal health and a recent history of no caries should have longer intervals (e.g. 9-12 months or longer) between recall visits.
- Those at high risk for dental caries and/or periodontal breakdown should be examined much more frequently (e.g. 3-4 months).
| Quadrant Dentistry|| |
This approach should be included in the treatment plan. It reduces the number of times local analgesics is used, makes maximum use of the time available, and is economically beneficial. 
| Documentation|| |
Documentation in the context of health care refers to the production of a physical record that contains the pertinent information related to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient.
| Features of Ideal Patient Documentation System|| |
- Allow quick and easy data entry
- Allow quick and easy data retrieval
- Should be comprehensive
- Should be brief
- Should be clear
- Should be made to use the data conveniently
- Should be easily expandable
- Should be versatile
- Should be efficient by quickly conveying complex information
- Should be economical
- Should be educational by reinforcing diagnostic, treatment planning, and patient management principles. 
| Charting|| |
Though various formats are available for recording a patient's dental condition, an acceptable charting system should conform to certain standards. The charts should be
- accessible, and
- current. 
| Conservative Charting|| |
This includes caries and existing restoration. This represents the dentition when viewed from in front of the patient, so that the teeth that are on the right side of the page are on the patient's left side and vice versa. The convention is that the horizontal line between the upper and lower teeth represents the tongue, so that the lingual or palatal surfaces are those nearest to this line, and the buccal or labial surfaces are those at the top of the top row and the bottom of the bottom row. The marks on the posterior teeth [Figure 1] divide the tooth into occlusal, mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces, and the same applies to the anterior teeth except that there is no occlusal surface. 
|Figure 1: This chart does not represent the size of the lesion or restoration|
Click here to view
| Interdisciplinary Considerations|| |
All teeth to be restored with large or cast restoration should have a pulpal/periapical evaluation. If indicated, they should have endodontic treatment before restoration is complete. For the endodontically inadequate filled tooth, oral fluids exposed to the fill should be evaluated before restorative therapy is initated. 
Generally, periodontal treatment should precede operative care, since it creates a more desirable environment for performing operative treatment. Any teeth requiring restorations that may encroach on the biologic width of periodontium should have appropriate crown-lengthening surgical procedures performed before the final restoration is placed. Usually, a minimum of 6 weeks is required following the surgery before final restorative procedures.
All teeth should be free of caries before orthodontic banding.
In most instances, impacted, unerupted, and hopelessly involved teeth should be removed before operative treatment. Also, soft tissue lesions, complicating exostoses, and improperly contoured ridge areas should be eliminated or corrected before final restorative care. 
The design of the restored tooth surface can have important effects on the number and location of occlusal contacts and must take into consideration both static and dynamic relationships. Occlusal adjustments should be considered before the definitive restoration phase.  .
Preferably, restorations should be completed before placing a cast restoration.
Tooth preparation and restorations should allow for the design of the removable partial denture, i.e., it should correlate with the design of the contemplated removable prosthesis. 
| Treatment Plan Approval|| |
Informed consent has become an integral part of modern day dental practice.  One aspect of informed consent is to provide the patient with the necessary information about the alternative therapies available to manage their oral conditions.
Advantages / disadvantages of each discussed
Risk associated with each alternative therapy
(Many times a reasonable alternative is not to intervene but instead to monitor the condition.)
Once the dentist is sure about the above, then treatment can proceed. ,
Many problems encountered during treatment are directly traceable to factors overlooked during the initial examination and data collection. It is important that the patient's mouth is not seen merely as a long list of items, each of which requires completion before the next one can be started.
| References|| |
|1.||McGivney GP, Castleberry DJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning. In: McCracken's Removable Partial Prosthosdontics, 8 th ed. Delhi: CBS Publishers and Distributors; 1989. p. 209-50. |
|2.||Shugars DA, Shugars DC. Patient Assessment, Examination and Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, editors. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 4 th ed. USA: Mosby; 2002. p. 389-428. |
|3.||Gilmore HW, Lund MR, Bales CDJ, Vernetti JP. The patient record, diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Operative Dentistry. 4 th ed. New Delhi: B.I. Publications Pvt. Ltd; 1994. p. 15-41. |
|4.||Staley RN. Orthodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. In: Bishara SE, editor. Textbook of Orthodontics. USA: WB Saunders Company; 2001. p. 98-112. |
|5.||Franco RL, Ortman LF. Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. In: Winkler S, editor. Essentials of complete Denture Prosthodontics. 2 nd ed. New Delhi: A.I.T.B.S Publishers and Distributors; 1996. p. 39-55. |
|6.||Carranza FA Jr. The Treatment Plan. In: Carranza FA Jr, Newman MG, editors. Clinical Periodontology. 8 th ed. Bangalore: Harcourt Asia Pvt. Ltd; 1999. p. 399-400. |
|7.||Profitt WR, Ackerman JL. Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Swain BF, editors. Orthodontics current principles and techniques. 1 st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers; 1991. p. 3-100. |
|8.||Coleman GC. Documentation. In: Coleman GC, Nelson JF, editors. Principles of Oral Diagnosis. USA: Mosby-Yearbook; 1993. p. 73-84. |
|9.||Charbeneau GT. Examination, Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. In: Principles and Practice of Operative Dentistry. 3 rd ed. Bombay: Varghese Publishing House; 1989. p. 19-41. |
|10.||Fasbinder DJ. Treatment Planner's toolkit. Gen Dent 1999;47:35-39. |
|11.||Roberson TM, Lundeen TF. Cariology: The lesion,Etiology,Prevention and Control. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, editors. Sturdevents' Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 4 th ed. USA: Mosby; 2002. p. 63-132. |
|12.||Krasse B. Caries Risk. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. |
|13.||Curzon ME, Roberts JF, Kennedy DB. Treatment Planning. In: Kennedy's Paediatric Operative Dentistry. 4 th ed. USA: Wright Publishers; 1996. p. 29-34. |
|14.||Amercian Dental Association. The Dental Patient record: Strucure and function guidelines. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1987. |
|15.||Kidd EA, Smith BGN, Pickard HM. Making Clinical Decisions. In: Pickard's Manual of Operative Dentistry. 7 th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 28-48. |
|16.||Madison M, Wilcox LR. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth. Part 3: In vivo study. J Endod 1998;14:455-8. |
|17.||Sturdevent JR, Lundeen TF, Sluder TB Jr. Clinical Significance of Dental Anatomy, Histology, Physiology, Operative Dentistry. 4 th ed. USA: Mosby; 2002. p. 13-62. |
|18.||Wilder AD Jr, Ritter AV, Roberson TM, May KN Jr. Complex Amalgam Restorations. In: Roberson TM, Heyman HO, Swift EJ, editors. Sturdevent's Art and Science of Operative dentistry. 4 th ed. USA: Mosby; 2002. p. 763-97. |
|19.||Sfikas PM. Informed consent and the Law. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:1471-3. |
|20.||Christensen GJ. Educating Patients About Dental Procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:371-2. |
|21.||Christensen GJ. Educating Patients: A New necessity. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:86-7. |