|
|
 
 |
| DENTAL SCIENCE - REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2013 | Volume
: 5
| Issue : 5 | Page : 98-102 |
|
|
Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present
Manikandan Ramasamy1, Giri2, Ramesh Raja2, Subramonian2, Karthik3, Rachuri Narendrakumar3
1 Department of Prosthodontia, K.S.R Dental College, Thiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Prosthodontia, Rajas Dental College, Kavalkinaru, Thirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Prosthodontia, K.S.R Institute of Dental Science and Research, Thiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India
| Date of Submission | 02-May-2013 |
| Date of Decision | 04-May-2013 |
| Date of Acceptance | 04-May-2013 |
| Date of Web Publication | 13-Jun-2013 |
Correspondence Address:
Manikandan Ramasamy
Department of Prosthodontia, K.S.R Dental College, Thiruchengode, Tamil Nadu
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.113306
 Abstract | | |
Advent of osseointegration has rapidly led to use of dental implants over recent years. Implant complications are often inadvertent sequelae of improper diagnosis, treatment planning, surgical method, and placement. This can be overcome by using surgical guides for implant positioning. Although conventionally made surgical guide are used, the clinical outcome is often unpredictable, and even if the implants are well placed, the location and deviation of the implants may not meet the optimal prosthodontic requirements. High accuracy in planning and execution of surgical procedures is important in securing a high success rate without causing iatrogenic damage. This can be achieved by computed tomography, 3D implant planning software, image-guided template production techniques, and computer-aided surgery. This article evaluates about the various systems of conventionally made surgical guide using radiograph and also the newer computer generated surgical guide in detail. Keywords: Computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture, computed tomography, implant, surgical guide
How to cite this article:
Ramasamy M, Giri, Raja R, Subramonian, Karthik, Narendrakumar R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2013;5, Suppl S1:98-102 |
How to cite this URL:
Ramasamy M, Giri, Raja R, Subramonian, Karthik, Narendrakumar R. Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 Mar 3];5, Suppl S1:98-102. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2013/5/5/98/113306 |
Dental implants have become a treatment options widely used for the replacement of lost teeth. The development of dental implants has had a major impact on the patients and the implant supported oral restoration has become an increasingly used treatment option for partially edentulous and completely edentulous patients, also even in patients with severe bone loss and in locations which all previously considered unsuitable for implant placement has been made possible by means of bone augmentation, regeneration and soft tissue regeneration procedures. [1] The success of dental implants in the treatment of patients is directly related to patient evaluation and good treatment planning.
Earlier dentists were intended to place implants where the greatest amount of bone was present, with less regard to placement of final definitive restoration. In most of the times, the placement of implant is not as accurate as intended. Even a minor variation in comparison to ideal placement causes difficulties in fabrication of final prostheses. [1],[2] Failures arise as a result of lack of consideration of the super structure during pre-surgical planning. Accurate placement is required to achieve best functional and esthetic result. Since the oral cavity is a relatively restricted space, a high degree of accuracy in placement of implant is very important for success of the prostheses. This can be achieved by means of a surgical guide which provides adequate information regarding implant placement and at the time of surgery it fits on to the existing dentition or on to the edentulous span. [2],[3],[4],[5] This article evaluates the conventionally used radiographic templates with their fabrication, advantages, disadvantages and a review of computer aided surgical guide.
| Surgical Template | |  |
The surgical template enables a predictable and a safe minimally invasive surgery. Glossary of prosthodontic terms (Gpt) 8, define surgical template as a guide used to assist in proper surgical placement and angulation of dental implants. [6] The main objective of surgical template is to direct the implant drilling system and provide an accurate placement of the implant according to the surgical treatment plan. To precisely transfer the plan to the operative site, customized conventional radiographic or computer image guided surgical templates have become a treatment of choice.
A surgical guide is the union of two components: The guiding cylinders and the contact surface. The contact surface fits either on an element of a patient's gums or on the patient's jaw (i.e., the bone, the teeth). Cylinders within the drill guides helps in transferring the plan by guiding the drill in the exact location and orientation. [7] The implant must be placed such that firstly the bottom and sides are covered fully by bone or bone-replacement material. Second should be the care of not damaging any neighboring anatomic structures. These are in particular the mandibular nerve in case of mandible and the schneiderian membrane of the maxillary sinus in maxilla and also the roots of adjacent teeth. Thirdly, position of the implant has to be compatible with the intended final prosthodontic restoration. [8]
There are three types of surgical guide: [7]
- Bone supported,
- Mucosa supported, and
- Tooth supported.
Three techniques commonly used for preparing the guide holes and fabricating the radiographic and surgical implant guide are conventional free-hand, milling, and computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD-CAM) technology. [9]
| Customized Conventional Radiographic Surgical Template | | |
The radiographic template is the key to the success, since it allows the transfer of the predetermined prosthetic setup to the actual implant planning. [7] In surgical template that makes use of a conventional radiographic method, a thorough radiographic examination and proper diagnosis of the bony architecture are fundamental prerequisites. [1] Panoramic radiography is still the standard for planning of implants. However, precise measuring of the bone architecture is impossible, because they have a magnification factor that is not always uniform. Therefore a better assessment of the bone dimensions in panoramic radiographs is by determination of the magnification factor (Mupparapu and Singer 2004). [8]
Conventional dental panoramic radiography and plain film radiography are usually performed with the patient wearing a radiographic template with integrated metal spheres or rods, sleeves, guide posts at the position of the wax up. Based on the magnification factor and the known dimensions of the metal, the depth and dimensions of the implants are planned. [1],[8],[10] The implant placement planning is guided by quality and quantity of bone, as well as the position of the teeth for esthetics and phonetics. [4]
| Fabrication Process | | |
Several types of surgical guides have been reported in the literature. Some are designed for placement of a single implant, while other reports present designs for implant fixed partial dentures, multiple single implants, and implant-retained overdentures. Some of the most commonly used techniques are mentioned briefly here.
Diagnostic casts of the dental arches are made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. A diagnostic wax up of the proposed in case of an implant supported FPD is done. A silicone impression of the cast with the waxed FPD is made as a mold. A clear, chemically activated acrylic resin is poured into the mold space and cured. Access holes are made according to information obtained from the cast model for initial surgical drill. Stainless steel guide sleeves of uniform length is cut and placed in access holes and cured. [2],[10],[11]
Yet another method to prepare a radiographic guide is from vacuum formed templates. After the diagnostic wax up of the final restoration is completed, duplication is made and a cast is poured. The vacuum formed template fabricated is placed over the cast and the edentulous space is filled with radio opaque material (Barium sulphate, lead strip, gutta percha). [12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17]
In another method, it make use of two vacuum formed templates, one over the blocked out diagnostic cast and other over the duplicate cast of the diagnostic wax up with a clear plastic sheet is made. [3] Both the templates are returned to the unaltered diagnostic cast. The edges of the two templates are trimmed to make them coincident. The diagnostic wax template is removed and filled with clear orthodontic resin or radio opaque material. The filled template is placed over the template of the unaltered diagnostic cast. [3] Holes are made according to information obtained from the radiograph for placement of implants, followed by placement of drill guides.
The radiopaque markers helps in predesigning the direction of implant placement and in comparing the angulations of radiopaque markers with the available bone and also in locating the position of the vital structures to determine the best angulations for the implant. [12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] These radio-opaque markers can be placed in the center of the occlusal surfaces of the teeth that corresponds to the screw access holes of the prosthesis. [12]
The milling technique is an accurate technique in which it employs parallel holes in the surgical guide. This technique needs the aid of a conventional dental surveyor. [9],[17],[18],[19] All the conventional made radiographic guides can be converted to an accurate surgical guide by means of this milling technique. Limitation in this technique is, it requires special equipment not commonly available in private dental practices. In addition, the practitioner needs a certain amount of experience and knowledge to use this machine properly. [9]
| Limitations | | |
However, panoramic radiography which is still the standard and widely used, has diagnostic limitations, such as expansion and distortion, setting error, positional artifacts and there is no information regarding the dimension of bone in bucco-lingual direction. [9] Further these surgical templates are fabricated on dental casts, which is a rigid, nonfunctional surface without the knowledge of underlying soft tissue resiliency and bone topography. [8],[12] Anatomical landmarks are not precisely located, it does not show the lingual blood vessels, and approach is always two dimensional. [1],[8] So thereby more chances of malpositioning the implants during placement. Always there is less stability during surgery. The success of the final outcome always depends on clinician skill and alertness. [4] It requires more chair time, leads to stress on the dentist and patient. Although conventional surgical templates will allow the placement of implant guiding, they do not provide exact 3D guidance. [1]
Computer generated surgical template
To overcome the limitations associated with conventional radiographic surgical template, computer generated surgical template have been evolved. [1] A computer generated surgical guide provides a link between our treatment plan and the actual surgery by transferring the simulated plan accurately to surgical site. This surgical guide is made using stereolithography process and is custom manufactured for each patient.
Stereolithography, a rapid prototyping technology, a newer outcome in dentistry allows the fabrication of surgical guides from 3D computer generated models for precise placement of the implants. [12] The surgical templates fabricated by this technology are preprogrammed with Individual depth, angulations, mesio-distal and labiolingual positioning of the implant. [12]
Fabrication of stereolithographic templates requires patient's computed tomography (CT) image. In CT, multi planar reformatting allows one to reformat a volumetric dataset in sagittal, axial, and coronal cuts and also helps in building multiple cross-sectional and panoramic views. Shaded surface display and volume rendering methods generate 3D reconstructions of the entire dental arch and their relevant structures, including nerves, which makes dental CT the most precise and comprehensive radiologic technique for dental implant planning. Software's specially planned has been adapted to allow practitioners to virtually view the implant site and plan location, angle, depth, and diameter of virtual implants, which are superimposed on the 3D data. Following backward planning, the diagnostic wax up has to be visualized through CT scan with radiographic templates in place. [1],[20],[21]
Procedures in fabrication of stereolithographic templates
- Radiographic template
- CT scan procedure
- 3D computer simulation
- Fabrication of templates
A radiographic template fabricated using radio opaque marker is kept in patient mouth while performing CT scan procedure. [12],[22]
During the scan, this indicates the position of the teeth and gingival tissues. [9] During fabrication, a diagnostic wax up is established, representing the outline of the final restoration, and is then transferred into a radiographic guide. [12]
Diagnostic casts of the dental arches are made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. A diagnostic wax up of the proposed definitive restoration (in case of an implant supported FPD) is done. A silicone impression of the cast with the waxed FPD is made as a mold. After retrieving the silicone impression, the waxed FPD is removed [2] and in case if the implant site is of full arch, a duplicate of a denture is made so that a radiographic stent can be made from it. [23] A clear, chemically activated acrylic resin is poured into the mold space and cured. [24] As an alternate, a duplicate cast is made in Type IV dental stone and a radiographic template is made using vacuum formed matrix or barium sulfate as the radio-opaque marker. Access holes are made according to information obtained from the cast model, as in case of conventional radiographic guide.
If the patient is a new denture wearer, complete denture wax up is done to establish the setup of denture teeth with phonetics, esthetics and proper vertical dimension of occlusion. The fabrication of an ideal denture is necessary, to avoid varied dimensions that plays a primary controlling factor in minimizing deviated angulations. [4],[25]
The radiographic template, thus fabricated act as an exact replica of desired prosthetic end result, and are usually supported with different radiopaque markers such as gutta percha balls, sleeves, disks and tubes, radiopaque varnishes or lead strip or foil. [1],[12],[14],[15],[16],[17] Some authors prefer metal pins for better accuracy. [24] In order to stabilize the template, the patient can be instructed to use denture adhesive during the scanning procedure. [8] In case, if it is a completely edentulous condition, six to eight radiopaque markers are placed into the guide. [4] A bite index is created to ensure a correct positioning of the radiographic guide in the patient's mouth during scanning.
The understanding of underlying bony architecture and anatomic structures are prerequisites for appropriate implant planning. [1] In general, the quality of CT data depends on the slice thickness and the influence of possible artifacts. The thinner the slice thickness and the smaller the voxel size, the higher the resolution and accuracy of measurements of delineated structures. Movement and metallic artifacts of some dental restorations may lead to geometric distortion and invalid acquisition. [1]
Double scan protocol
For artifact free, high resolution digitization of the radiographic guide, some authors have developed a specific double-scan technique. In this technique, the first scan is a scan of the patient wearing the radiographic guide. The second scan is a scan of only the radiographic guide. Based on the spherical markers visible in both scans, the scans are superimposed onto each other, resulting in a 3D bone model of the patient together with a 3D model of the radiographic guide. [4],[13]
Converting raw data to 3D information is done by various software's available or by just sending to master site of the particular software manufacturers. CT or Cone beam scan data thus obtained is sent from the radiology site to Master site nearby. Master site will convert the CT or Conebeam scan data into a file that contains reformatted images in 2D and an insightful 3D representation of patient's anatomy. On finally the file contains cross-sectional images, panoramic views, axial images, and a 3D representation of the patient's anatomy. [12]
The combination of a 3D bone model and 3D radiological dataset lets dental professionals to evaluate bone quantity. [13] Underlying anatomical structures such as nerves and blood vessels, as well as dental roots, can be identified and marked with the help of several reslice views. Special tools are available to highlight dental roots, nerves and other anatomical structures or restrictions. Software allows to turn 3D images, rotate these images, and to view the treatment plan from all angles simplifying diagnostic procedures and placement of implants. 3D distances can easily be measured, and a tool to measure the grey values is also available. These anatomical annotations are visible in the 3D setting and in the reslice viewer. [13]
The combination of a 3D bone model, including the 3D radiological dataset and the 3D radiographic guide model, enables clinician to place implant locations according to anatomical, functional and esthetics needs and demands. In order to achieve this, the clinician virtually positions the implants, with the optimal length and diameter. Any of the modifications in 3D location and implant type, size or shape can be done in the 3D setting or in the reslice viewer. After finalizing the planning, the corresponding surgical template is designed. The surgical template thus fabricated contains all the necessary planning information-It is customized according to location, type and size of the planned implants.
Making a computer aided template
CAD-CAM a rapid prototyping technique in which after the generation of a 3D treatment plan, software slices from the file is sent to a machine that fabricates the part slice by slice. Two main methods of rapid proto typing are [26]
- Additive - widely used
- Subtractive - less effective
Stereolithographic apparatus consists of a vat, which contains a liquid photo polymerized resin. Corresponding to slice intervals, an laser that is mounted on top of vat moves in sequential cross sectional of 1 mm increments, to produce template. Polymerization process of photo polymerized resin occurs in layers. Once, the surface layer of the resin on laser contact gets polymerized, a mechanical table immediately below the surface layer moves down 1 mm, carrying with it the previously polymerized resin layer. The laser now polymerizes the next layer over the previously polymerized layer of the model. In stereolithography Apparatus (SLA) only 80% of the total polymerization is completed in the vat, whereas the remaining 20% can be completed in a conventional ultraviolet light curing unit. [12]
The so produced surgical template is provided with surgical grade stainless steel tubes with sleeves that are 5 mm in height, 0.2 mm wider than osteotomy, and also with drill limiting angulation deviation to 5°. Buccal window is made so that it enhances retention during surgery. Usually, three 2 mm holes are placed into the buccal surface of each side of the denture. [4]
Advantages
- More precise placement of implants.
- Preservation of anatomic structures.
- High geometrical accuracy of 0.1 mm.
- Shorter treatment times, surgery times.
- Less invasive, flapless surgery and therefore less chance of swelling.
- Less post-operative strain on dentist and patient.
- Transparency of material which allows seeing through the model.
- To summarize stereolithography fabrication process.
- A CT scan procedure is performed with a radiographic template fabricated using radio opaque marker in place.
- Data obtained from CT scan procedure is either sent to master site of a particular software company or dentist can view the virtual 3D model from different angles using the software to customize the treatment plan.
- The final proposed treatment plan is sent to SLA that scans the image and fabricates the template.
| Conclusion | | |
In order to achieve a successful final treatment outcome, a position at least equivalent to the maximum deviation of the implant placement is necessary. This has been best achieved clinically with the help of a computer aided surgical guide. But compared to the conventional technique, limitation with computer-aided implant surgery requires substantially greater investment and effort. Based on clinical data, image guidance is not required for cases with sufficient anatomic orientation and bone height. Computer aided planning and image guided surgery can be carried out, when implant positioning is to be precisely executed, and when safe positioning of implants with optimal use of available bone, and whenever a CT scan is recommended as a diagnostic means.
| References | | |
| 1. | Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery: A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:305-13. 
|
| 2. | Takeshita F, Suetsugu T. Accurate presurgical determination for implant placement by using computerized tomography scan. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:590-1.
|
| 3. | Pesun IJ, Gardner FM. Fabrication of a guide for radiographic evaluation and surgical placement of implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:548-52.
|
| 4. | Marchack CB, Moy PK. The use of a custom template for immediate loading with the definitive prosthesis: A clinical report. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:925-9.
|
| 5. | Chiu WK, Luk WK, Cheung LK. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant placement in a computer-assisted navigation system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:465-70.
|
| 6. | The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92.
|
| 7. | Drill guides for every case scenario: SurgiGuide Cookbook. Available from: http://www.materialisedental.com/materialise/view/en/2395185 SurgiGuide+dental+drill+guide+Cookbook.html. [Cited on 2009 Jan 25].
|
| 8. | Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:495-501.
|
| 9. | Arfai NK, Kiat-Amnuay S. Radiographic and surgical guide for placement of multiple implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:310-2.
|
| 10. | Meitner SW, Tallents RH. Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:569-74.
|
| 11. | Solow RA. Simplified radiographic-surgical template for placement of multiple, parallel implants. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:26-9.
|
| 12. | Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J Prosthodont 2006;15:51-8.
|
| 13. | Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part II. A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2006;15:117-22.
|
| 14. | Basten CH, Kois JC. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:451-4.
|
| 15. | Basten CH. The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int 1995;26:609-12.
|
| 16. | Almog DM, Torrado E, Meitner SW. Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:504-8.
|
| 17. | Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:248-51.
|
| 18. | Akça K, Iplikçioðlu H, Cehreli MC. A surgical guide for accurate mesiodistal paralleling of implants in the posterior edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:233-5.
|
| 19. | Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:611-5.
|
| 20. | Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:137-41.
|
| 21. | Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:143-8.
|
| 22. | Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: Treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:599-604.
|
| 23. | Wulfman C, Hadida A, Rignon-Bret C. Radiographic and surgical guide fabrication for implant-retained mandibular overdenture. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:53-7.
|
| 24. | Cehreli MC, Sahin S. Fabrication of a dual-purpose surgical template for correct labiopalatal positioning of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:278-82.
|
| 25. | Choi M, Romberg E, Driscoll CF. Effects of varied dimensions of surgical guides on implant angulations. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:463-9.
|
| 26. | Dilipjoshi M, Dange SP, Khalikar AN. Rapid prototyping technology in maxillofacial prosthodontics: Basics and applications. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2006;6:175-8.
|
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Success Factors of Additive Manufactured Root Analogue Implants |
|
| Minyan Liu, Yanen Wang, Shan Zhang, Qinghua Wei, Xinpei Li | | ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
The development of computer-aided patient-specific template design software for 3D printing in cranio-maxillofacial surgery |
|
| Afaque R. Memon, Dongyuan Li, Junlei Hu, Enpeng Wang, Dingzhong Zhang, Xiaojun Chen | | The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2021; 17(3) | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: A systematic review |
|
| R. Eftekhar Ashtiani, Z. Ghasemi, M. Nami, F. Mighani, M. Namdari | | Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 122(6): 600 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Denture scanning technique for computer-guided implant-supported restoration treatment of edentulous patients |
|
| Guilherme Faria Moura, Rafael Siqueira, Luiz Meirelles, Bartosz Maska, Hom-Lay Wang, Gustavo Mendonça | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021; 125(5): 726 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
ÜÇ BOYUTLU YAZICILARIN DENTAL KULLANIMINDA GÜNCEL PROTETIK YAKLASIMLAR |
|
| Betül ARSLAN, Levent NALBANT, A. Dilek NALBANT, Matlab NADIROV | | Atatürk Üniversitesi Dis Hekimligi Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Guided Insertion of Temporary Anchorage Device in Form of Orthodontic Titanium Miniscrews with Customized 3D Templates—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies |
|
| Maciej Jedlinski, Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska, Marta Mazur, Livia Ottolenghi, Katarzyna Grocholewicz, Gabriella Galluccio | | Coatings. 2021; 11(12): 1488 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Biomechanical evaluation of stress distribution in subcrestal placed platform-switched short dental implants in D4 bone: In vitro finite-element model study |
|
| ManchalaR Sesha, Rajashekar Sunduram, HossamA Eid Abdelmagyd | | Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2020; 12(5): 134 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 8 |
Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial |
|
| Paweena Yimarj, Keskanya Subbalekha, Kanit Dhanesuan, Kiti Siriwatana, Nikos Mattheos, Atiphan Pimkhaokham | | Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2020; 22(6): 672 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 9 |
Utility and cost–effectiveness of 3D-printed materials for clinical use |
|
| Julian Vitali, Matthew Cheng, Michael Wagels | | Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine. 2019; 3(4): 209 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 10 |
3D Printing Guide Implant Placement: A Case Report |
|
| Zoran Vlahovic, Mirko Mikic | | Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. 2017; 21(1): 65 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 11 |
CT image segmentation methods for bone used in medical additive manufacturing |
|
| Maureen van Eijnatten,Roelof van Dijk,Johannes Dobbe,Geert Streekstra,Juha Koivisto,Jan Wolff | | Medical Engineering & Physics. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 12 |
Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis |
|
| Wenjuan Zhou,Zhonghao Liu,Liansheng Song,Chia-ling Kuo,David M. Shafer | | Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 13 |
A semi-automatic computer-aided method for surgical template design |
|
| Xiaojun Chen,Lu Xu,Yue Yang,Jan Egger | | Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 20280 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 14 |
Computer-aided design and manufacturing of surgical templates and their clinical applications: a review |
|
| Xiaojun Chen,Lu Xu,Wei Wang,Xing Li,Yi Sun,Constantinus Politis | | Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2016; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 15 |
Applications of medical rapid prototyping assisted customized surgical guides in complex surgeries |
|
| Sandeep W. Dahake,Abhaykumar M. Kuthe,Mahesh B. Mawale,Ashutosh D. Bagde | | Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2016; 22(6): 934 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 16 |
Emergence Profile Index (EPI) Implant Surgical Guide |
|
| Mei-Hua Lee,Guo-Hao Lin,Hom-Lay Wang | | Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2016; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 17 |
Non-Radiological Method for Fabrication of a Screw-Channel Drilling Guide in Cement-Retained Implant Restorations Using Intraoral Digital Scanning and Imaging Superimposition: A Clinical Report |
|
| Hang-Nga Mai,Kyung-Rok Kim,Du-Hyeong Lee | | Journal of Prosthodontics. 2016; : n/a | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 18 |
The accuracy of ultrashort echo time MRI sequences for medical additive manufacturing |
|
| Maureen van Eijnatten,Erik-Jan Rijkhorst,Mark Hofman,Tymour Forouzanfar,Jan Wolff | | Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2016; 45(5): 20150424 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 19 |
Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study |
|
| Loubna Shamseddine,Rola Mortada,Khaldoun Rifai,Jose Johann Chidiac | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2016; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 20 |
Surgiguide used for a minimally Invasive Flapless Surgery and Precise Placement of Eight Nobel Biocare (Select) Implants |
|
| Supriya A Rai, Chokanda Jeevan, Vijay Jeevan | | International Journal of Clinical Implant Dentistry. 2015; 1(3): 107 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 21 |
Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report |
|
| Brandon M. Stapleton,Wei-Shao Lin,Athanasios Ntounis,Bryan T. Harris,Dean Morton | | The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
