| DENTAL SCIENCE - ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2015 | Volume
: 7
| Issue : 6 | Page : 518-523 |
|
|
Evaluation of sealing ability two self-etching adhesive systems and a glass ionomer lining LC under composite restoration in primary tooth: An in vitro study
Ananda Xavier Pragasam1, Vinola Duraisamy2, Ullal Anand Nayak3, Venugopal Reddy4, Arun Prasad Rao5
1 Department of Pedodontics, CSI College of Dental Science and Research, Madurai, India
2 Department of Pedodontics, VMSDC, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Pedodontics, NIMS Dental College, NIMS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
4 Department of Pedodontics, Khammam Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India
5 Department of Pedodontics, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ananda Xavier Pragasam
Department of Pedodontics, CSI College of Dental Science and Research, Madurai
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.163525
|
|
|
Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the sealing ability of two self-etching adhesive systems and glass ionomer cement (GIC) lining Light cure (LC) under composite restorations in primary teeth. Materials and Methods: Class V cavities are prepared on the cervical third of the facial and lingual surfaces of primary molars. The specimens are then assigned into four experimental groups. The restored primary molars are stored in distilled water and subjected to thermocycling. Each section was examined using a stereomicroscope to assess dye penetration at the margin of the restoration and evaluated via pictures. Statistical Analysis Used: The degree of microleakage was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test and the intergroup significance by multiple comparison analysis. Results: The mean rank of the groups are Group I (Adper Prompt TM + Z−100) 19.44, Group II (UniFil BOND + Solare) 5.38, Group III (GIC lining LC + Z−100) 20.06, and Group IV (GIC lining LC + Solare) 21.13 with the P < 0.001. Conclusion: Composite resin restorations bonded with two-step self-etching adhesive system (UniFil Bond) exhibited lesser microleakage than one-step self-etching adhesive system (Adperprompt TM ) in primary teeth. |
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
