|DENTAL SCIENCE - ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 6 | Page : 576-579
Comparative evaluation of effect of different irrigation solutions against Enterococcus faecalis: A polymerase chain reaction-based study
R Gnana Seelan1, Arvind Kumar1, R Jonathan1, Uma Maheswari1, Jacob Raja2, P Chelliah3
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rajas Dental College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Periodontics, Rajas Dental College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India
3 Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Mookambika Institute Of Dental Sciences, Kulasekharam, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||28-Apr-2015|
|Date of Decision||28-Apr-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||22-May-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||1-Sep-2015|
Dr. R Gnana Seelan
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rajas Dental College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Enterococcus faecalis is the most isolated or detected species from oral infections including marginal periodontitis, infected root canals, periradicular abscesses and also detected in cases of failed endodontic therapy. To prevent endodontic treatment failure irrigation is mandatory for the effective removal of smear layer, pulp tissue, and microorganisms. Cultivation and other traditional identification methods have been demonstrated to have several limitations when it comes to microbiological identification. Polymerase chain reaction was selected because it has an added advantage over traditional microbiological methods. Materials and Methods: Twenty single rooted premolars were taken were taken stored in 0.1% thymol solution at 4°C decoronated to obtain 12 mm length, teeth were autoclaved at 121°C, canals were instrumented up to 35k file (International Organization for Standardization). The samples were randomly divided into three groups Group I - 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCL) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group - II 5.25% NaOCL and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), Group III - 5.25% NaOCL and 17% EDTA and 2% CHX. Results: The results showed that Group III which is 5% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA and followed by 2% CHX showed maximum antimicrobial activity in all the three different time intervals.
Keywords: Enterococcus faecalis , irrigants, polymerase chain reaction
|How to cite this article:|
Seelan R G, Kumar A, Jonathan R, Maheswari U, Raja J, Chelliah P. Comparative evaluation of effect of different irrigation solutions against Enterococcus faecalis: A polymerase chain reaction-based study. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7, Suppl S2:576-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Seelan R G, Kumar A, Jonathan R, Maheswari U, Raja J, Chelliah P. Comparative evaluation of effect of different irrigation solutions against Enterococcus faecalis: A polymerase chain reaction-based study. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 May 17];7, Suppl S2:576-9. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2015/7/6/576/163546
Of the major diseases occurring in the human body, the most unique disease occurring in the human body is the infection because the infection establishes itself in an area where micro-organisms have previously not been present. In 1965, Kakehashi et al. convincingly established the role of bacterial infection in pulpitis and apical periodontitis. In 1970, Sundqvist determined that most bacteria in endodontic infections are strict anaerobes.
Enterococcus faecalis is the most commonly isolated species from oral infections including marginal periodontitis, infected root canals, periradicular abscesses, and also detected in cases of failed endodontic therapy. E. faecalis has the potential to get adapted for the survival in a variety of adverse environments. Moreover, hence it can survive in root canal infections where the availability of nutrients.
Shaping and cleaning is the most important step in root canal treatment. This eliminates the microbial infection from the root canal space and from the dentinal tubules. This can be achieved with the help of irrigants for the removal of organic tissue, smear layer, as well as the microorganisms. Irrigation dynamics also play an important role, and the effectiveness of irrigation depends on many factors like the working mechanism of the irrigant and the ability to contact with the microorganisms and the tissue debris present in the root canal complex.
There are many innovative approaches in irrigation protocol to enhance the action of irrigants. The combined use of many irrigants in sequential order may help in eliminating the organisms effectively. However, caution should be exercised when using the combined irrigation protocol because of the chemical interaction between the irrigation solutions that result in precipitation in the root canal space. Hence, the application of final irrigating solution should remain active at the time of application, as well as over a long period of time, for preventing bacterial recolonization or eliminating the bacteria that persist after root canal treatment. The most common final irrigation protocol includes various irrigants specifically, a chelating agent followed by an antimicrobial irrigant to remove both the inorganic and organic components of smear layer from the surface of instrumented root canals. The alternate use of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), a deproteinizing agent, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), a calcium chelating agent has been recommended for its efficient removal. , These irrigants must be brought into direct contact with the entire canal wall for effective action. 
Most of the studies, done on the microbiota of root canals in teeth with failed endodontic treatment have used culture techniques for bacterial identification. Cultivation, which is the traditional identification method has limitations when it comes to microbiological identification. In contrast, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based detection methods enable rapid identification of both uncultivable and cultivable microbial species with high specificity and sensitivity. Hence, in the current study, PCR was selected to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigants against E. faecalis.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Twenty single rooted premolars were taken were taken stored in 0.1% thymol solution at 4°C decoronated to obtain 12 mm length, teeth were autoclaved at 121°C, canals were instrumented up to 35k file (International Organization for Standardization). The samples were randomly divided into three groups
- Group I - 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA
- Group II - 5.25% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine (CHX)
- Group III - 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA and 2% CHX.
After irrigation, root canals were dried, and dentinal shavings were taken using H-files. The regrowth of E. faecalis was checked at 1-day, 7 days, and 14 days. The samples were transferred to an eppendorf tube containing 5 ml of brain heart infusion broth. The broth was transferred to blood agar plates to check the regrowth of bacteria.
| Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis|| |
Microorganism and inoculum preparation
A suspension of 50 μl of E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) strain was incubated in 5 ml of Trypticase Soy Agar broth culture medium (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) at 37°C in an incubator for 4 h. The concentration of the inoculation was then adjusted to a degree of turbidity (0.5) according to the McFarland scale (Bio Merieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), which corresponds to a bacterial load of 3 × 10 8 cells/ml and an optical density of 600 nm [Table 1].
|Table 1: The Real-time PCR assay was carried out in a thermal cycler (7900HT Real-time PCR system)|
Click here to view
Real-time polymerase chain reaction using Enterococcus faecalis specific 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid primer
The final volume of 20 μl was prepared from the reaction mix and loaded in a 96-well plate, which was then covered with an optical adhesive sheet [Graph 1] and [Table 2] and [Table 3].
| Results|| |
Statistical analysis was done using software SPSS version 21.0 and one-way analysis of variance and Fisher extract test at a significance level of 0.05%. The results showed that Group III, which is 5% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA and followed by 2% PCR analysis. CHX showed maximum antimicrobial activity in all the three different time intervals [Table 4].
| Discussion|| |
The basis of endodontic treatment is to the control of endodontic microbiota. Many irrigation solutions have been used in the treatment of infected root canal. , In the current study, E. faecalis had been chosen as a testing organism because PCR, though making up a small proportion of flora in untreated canals, plays an important role in persistent periradicular lesions after root canal treatment. It is commonly associated with root canal failure cases, and it is able to survive in the root canal as a single organism or as a major component of the flora. E. faecalis, a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobe, and is most commonly found in the root canals of failing endodontically treated cases.  It can survive as a monoinfection in root canals.  E. faecalis has displayed resistance to chemo-mechanical preparation  and intracanal medication.  The persistence of E. faecalis may stem, from its capability to form biofilms in root canals.  If bacteria are located only on the root canal surface, the intracanal medicaments can reach and may present efficacy against E. faecalis. E. faecalis showed resistant to the antibacterial action of irrigants when they are lodged in deep layers that are within the dentinal tubules.
In the current study, PCR was used as measuring tool since it provides many advantages than the traditional culture methods. PCR is currently a more precise method for detection of E. faecalis., This method provides to be faster, more sensitive, and more accurate than culturing methods and has enabled researchers to detect bacteria that were difficult.  When compared to detection of E. faecalis by culturing (24-70%), E. faecalis has been found at consistently higher percentages (67-77%) when a PCR detection method is used.  An important distinction needs to be made between what is evaluated by culture and PCR assays.  The viable bacterial cells were counted by culturing as colony-forming units. Molecular methods measure nucleotide sequences, and the PCR method allow amplification of very minute quantities of deoxyribonucleic acid to detectable levels.
The selection of endodontic irrigants that synergistically have the ideal properties was a major point in the present study. CHX, in a 2% gel or liquid concentration, is effective at eliminating E. faecalis from the dentinal tubules. ,, A 2 min rinse of 2% CHX liquid can be used to remove E. faecalis from the superficial layers of dentinal tubules up to 100 _m.  Concentrations of 1-2% CHX when combined with calcium hydroxide had the efficacy at killing E. faecalis.,, When CHX was combined with calcium hydroxide, the combined mixture had a greater ability to kill E. faecalis than calcium hydroxide mixed with water.  Two percentage CHX gel, when combined with calcium hydroxide, achieves a pH of 12.8 and can completely eradicate E. faecalis within dentinal tubules.  It is important that CHX alone has been shown to provide as good or even better, antimicrobial action against E. faecalis than calcium hydroxide/CHX combinations. , Until further studies have been conducted, an intracanal dressing of 2% CHX placed for 7 days may be the best way to eradicate E. faecalis from dentinal tubules and the root canal space , . In other in vitro studies, CHX -impregnated, and iodoform-containing gutta-percha points have shown little inhibitory action against E. faecalis., Unlike NaOCl, CHX lacks a tissue dissolving property. Therefore, NaOCl is still considered to be the primary irrigation solution used in endodontics.
This study, Group III treated with 5.25% NaOCL and 17% EDTA and 2% CHX showed the least regrowth, followed by Group II 17% EDTA and 2% CHX after 14 days and rest of the groups showed increased regrowth after 14 days.
The final irrigation with CHX provides good antimicrobial activity and imparts substantivity. This Group III irrigation combination and the order of irrigation solution used both provide higher antimicrobial activity when compared to Group I and II. The NaOCl at 5.25% dissolves organic tissue and kill bacteria. And EDTA was used as the next irrigant, which act as chelating agent removes the smear layer. Since EDTA effectively abolishes the tissue dissolving effect of NaOCl this was not used as the final irrigant. Alternating use of NaOCl and EDTA during instrumentation is a common practice. Since EDTA abolishes the tissue dissolving effect of NaOCl and should not be used until at the end of the treatment as the final rinse. , CHX was used as final irrigant that increases the antimicrobial spectral activity. This result is in accordance with Zamany et al. in 2003 reported a further reduction in the proportion of positive cultures in the CHX group. Their results showed a better disinfection of the root canals using CHX compared to saline as a final rinse. 
The main use of an irrigant is to reduce the bacterial load during root canal treatment. The application of a final irrigating solution that remains active not only at the time of application but over a fairly long period of time is paramount.
The sequential use of NaOCl and a chelating agent or acid that dissolves inorganic tissue is required. Hence, the protocol for smear layer removal is NaOCl followed by EDTA or citric acid. Even though EDTA or citric acid removes the smear layer, they cannot do it completely without the preceding use of NaOCl. Water, saline CHX or iodine compounds have no dissolving effect on the smear layer. 
The Group II, which is 5.25% NaOCl, and CHX provide better antimicrobial activity than Group I.
Moreover, Group I showed the least antimicrobial activity. Moreover, when using the irrigants in combination, the chemical interaction between the irrigants should also be considered.
Bui et al.  evaluated the effect of irrigating root canals with a combination of NaOCl and CHX on root dentin and dentinal tubules by using scanning electron microscope and indicated that there were no significant differences in the amount of debris remaining between the negative control group and the experimental groups, although there were significantly fewer patent tubules when compared with the negative control group and concluded that the NaOCl/CHX precipitate tends to occlude the dentinal tubules and suggested that, and caution should be exercised when irrigating with both NaOCl and CHX. However, CHX lacks a tissue dissolving property. Therefore, NaOCl is still considered to be the primary irrigation solution used in endodontics.
Grawehr, et al.  studied the interactions of EDTA with NaOCl and concluded that EDTA retained its calcium-complexing ability when mixed with NaOCl. However, NaOCl loses its tissue dissolving capacity when used with EDTA. Hence, EDTA and NaOCl should be used separately. In few situations the copious amount of NaOCl should be administered to wash out remnants of EDTA.
Sodium hypochlorite is the most important irrigating solution during root canal treatment and should be used throughout the instrumentation. In higher concentrations, it kills bacteria and lower concentrations it dissolves organic tissue. Final irrigation with EDTA should be done to complete the removal of the smear layer and to continue the antimicrobial effect. Using CHX as final irrigation after EDTA provides good antimicrobial activity because of its substantivity. Alternating the use of NaOCl and EDTA during instrumentation is not advocated as EDTA effectively abolished the tissue dissolving effect of NaOCl and may increase erosion of dentin. For the same reason, a final NaOCL rinse after smear layer removal is not recommended.
| Conclusion|| |
Within the limitations of this study combination of irrigants and its sequential use have a valuable role in root canal treatment in eliminating the microorganisms. PCR can be used as a valuable tool for microbial identification than the traditional culture methods, which aid in more precise diagnosis.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Svec TA, Harrison JW. Chemomechanical removal of pulpal and dentinal debris with sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide vs normal saline solution. J Endod 1977;3:49-53.
Rossi-Fedele G, Scott W, Spratt D, Gulabivala K, Roberts AP. Incidence and behaviour of Tn916-like elements within tetracycline-resistant bacteria isolated from root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21:218-22.
Parente JM, Loushine RJ, Susin L, Gu L, Looney SW, Weller RN, et al
. Root canal debridement using manual dynamic agitation or the EndoVac for final irrigation in a closed system and an open system. Int Endod J 2010;43:1001-12.
Ayhan H, Sultan N, Cirak M, Ruhi MZ, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irrigants on selected microorganisms. Int Endod J 1999;32:99-102.
Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J 1985;18:35-40.
Rôças IN, Siqueira JF Jr, Santos KR. Association of Enterococcus faecalis
with different forms of periradicular diseases. J Endod 2004;30:315-20.
Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2003;36:1-11.
Peciuliene V, Reynaud AH, Balciuniene I, Haapasalo M. Isolation of yeasts and enteric bacteria in root-filled teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 2001;34:429-34.
Orstavik D, Haapasalo M. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:142-9.
Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod 2002;28:689-93.
Molander A, Lundquist P, Papapanou PN, Dahlén G, Reit C. A protocol for polymerase chain reaction detection of Enterococcus faecalis
and Enterococcus faecium
from the root canal. Int Endod J 2002;35:1-6.
Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. PCR methodology as a valuable tool for identification of endodontic pathogens. J Dent 2003;31:333-9.
Zambon JJ, Haraszthy VI. The laboratory diagnosis of periodontal infections. Periodontol 2000 1995;7:69-82.
Vahdaty A, Pitt Ford TR, Wilson RF. Efficacy of chlorhexidine in disinfecting dentinal tubules in vitro
. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993;9:243-8.
Gomes BP, Souza SF, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Valdrighi L, et al.
Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine gel and calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis
in bovine root dentine in vitro
. Int Endod J 2003;36:267-75.
Basrani B, Santos JM, Tjäderhane L, Grad H, Gorduysus O, Huang J, et al.
Substantive antimicrobial activity in chlorhexidine-treated human root dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:240-5.
Sukawat C, Srisuwan T. A comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of three calcium hydroxide formulations on human dentin infected with Enterococcus faecalis
. J Endod 2002;28:102-4.
Evans MD, Baumgartner JC, Khemaleelakul SU, Xia T. Efficacy of calcium hydroxide: Chlorhexidine paste as an intracanal medication in bovine dentin. J Endod 2003;29:338-9.
Shur AL, Sedgley CM, Fenno JC. The antimicrobial efficacy of 'MGP' gutta-percha in vitro
. Int Endod J 2003;36:616-21.
Lui JN, Sae-Lim V, Song KP, Chen NN. In vitro
antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine-impregnated gutta percha points on Enterococcus faecalis
. Int Endod J 2004;37:105-13.
Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-98.
Rossi-Fedele G, Dogramaci EJ, Guastalli AR, Steier L, de Figueiredo JA. Antagonistic interactions between sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, EDTA, and citric acid. J Endod 2012;38:426-31.
Zamany A, Safavi K, Spångberg LS. The effect of chlorhexidine as an endodontic disinfectant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:578-81.
Baumgartner JC, Brown CM, Mader CL, Peters DD, Shulman JD. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal debridement using saline, sodium hypochlorite, and citric acid. J Endod 1984;10:525-31.
Bui TB, Baumgartner JC, Mitchell JC. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. J Endod 2008;34:181-5.
Grawehr M, Sener B, Waltimo T, Zehnder M. Interactions of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Int Endod J 2003;36:411-7.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]