|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 319-323
Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods
S Preethi Suganya1, P Manimaran1, D Saisadan1, C Dhinesh Kumar1, D Abirami2, V Monnica1
1 Department of Prosthodontics, JKKN Dental College & Hospital, Komarapalayam, Tamil Nadu, India
2 RVS Dental College and Hospital, Sulur, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||01-Feb-2020|
|Date of Decision||05-Feb-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||02-Apr-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||28-Aug-2020|
S Preethi Suganya
H38, Phase 4, Muthyampalayam Housing Unit, Rangampalyam Post, Erode, Tamil Nadu.
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim: The main purpose of the study was to learn the possible shade differences between human eye and the digital method with spectrophotometric methods. Materials and Methods: Fifty dental students of age groups 18–25 with maxillary right central incisor after undergoing oral prophylaxis were included in this study. Before undergoing shade selection, standardization protocol was followed. The shade of the right maxillary central incisor was determined by using the following methods: visual, spectrophotometer, and digital photography. The shades obtained by both spectrophotometer and visual methods are compared and similarly L*, a*, and b* values obtained by both spectrophotometer and digital methods are compared. Finally these comparisons are subjected to statistical analysis. Results: Z and P values of digital and spectrophotometric methods were found to be statistically significant. Tooth shade selected between spectrophotometric and visual method was analyzed by using chi-square test, which shows highly significant value. Conclusion: It was concluded that the digital photography can be used as one of the reliable methods for shade selection in a clinical setup.
Keywords: Digital photography, shade selection, spectrophotometer, visual shade matching
|How to cite this article:|
Preethi Suganya S, Manimaran P, Saisadan D, Dhinesh Kumar C, Abirami D, Monnica V. Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2020;12, Suppl S1:319-23
|How to cite this URL:|
Preethi Suganya S, Manimaran P, Saisadan D, Dhinesh Kumar C, Abirami D, Monnica V. Spectrophotometric evaluation of shade selection with digital and visual methods. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 8];12, Suppl S1:319-23. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2020/12/5/319/292910
| Introduction|| |
A smile can change drowning things and can give positive aura. But not every single person is blessed with attractive smile. The key to the above problem is esthetic dentistry which was advanced with the latest technologies for better esthetic results. Inappropriate shade selection results in remake of ceramic restorations, but the main cause occurs due to improper tooth preparation and impression making. Hence to overcome the problem, proper understanding and knowledge of color is important. In dentistry, prosthodontist is most likely the best person to rule out the quality of smile especially in esthetics. Thus, the shade selection is considered as an important procedure in fixed prosthodontics. The main aim of the study was to analyze shade differences between the visual and digital methods using spectrophotometer.
This study compares the shade selection using two different methods, namely visual method (VITA Classical, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) and digital photography method (Canon EOS 750D, 30-2 Shimomaurko 3-chrome, Ohta-ku, Tokyo, Japan) with spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Compact, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany).
| Materials and Methods|| |
Vita Easyshade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer (VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) [Figure 1], VITA classical shade guide (VITAPAN Zahnfabrik, VITA Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH and Co., Bad Sackingen, Germany) with blue reflectant card [Figure 2], and digital camera, such as Canon EOS 750D [Figure 3], Tripod stand, 18% gray reflectant card, and Cheek Retractor, were the materials used in this study.
Fifty dental students from our dental college of age groups 18–25 with maxillary right central incisor after undergoing oral prophylaxis were included in this study. Before undergoing shade selection procedure, the teeth are dried using cotton. Discolored teeth, restorations, endodontically treated teeth, extrinsic stains, nonvital or fractured teeth, presence of crowns, and veneers are excluded and females were asked to remove the lipstick. The study was proceeded after acquiring the necessary approval from the Ethical committee of the Institution and an informed consent was obtained from the students. The L*, a*, and b* values of spectrophotometer reported along with the actual shade, whereas the image captured by digital photography method reports only the L*, a*, and b* values using Adobe CS software (Bengel, Middle Easter Version by Adobe Version: 8.0) [Table 1]. The shades obtained by the visual method were marked down for further comparisons [Table 2]. The readings obtained by these different methods were compared and subjected to appropriate statistical analysis. Standardization protocol was followed during the study. All the shade matching procedures were performed by the same operator.
|Table 1: ΔE values and agreement between spectrophotometer and digital methods|
Click here to view
| Results|| |
Tooth shade selected between spectrophotometric and visual method was analyzed by using chi-square test. Chi-square value = 62.216 and P = 0.0001 [Table 3] were found to be highly significant (P < 0.05* indicates statistically significant and P < 0.001** indicates highly significant). On estimating value, the measurement of agreement between the spectrophotometer with digital methods and spectrophotometer with visual methods remains the same, i.e., κ coefficient values will be 0.597 and P value will be 0.001 which shows statistically significant with higher proportion. The nonparametric measure of Spearmen rank correlation is 0.628 and the P value for that rank is 0.001. These values were found to be statistically significant [Table 4]. Here, L, a, and b values of the tooth shade selected between spectrophotometric and digital methods were analyzed by using Wilcoxon signed rank test [Table 5]. Values of Z and P were found to be statistically significant. Similarly, the mean and standard deviation for ΔE difference in shade between spectrophotometric and digital photographic values were found to be 1.49 and 1.29, respectively[Table 6].
|Table 3: Comparison between spectrophotometric method and visual method using chi-square test|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Descriptive and inferential statistics for measure of agreement|
Click here to view
|Table 5: Comparison between spectrophotometric and digital or photographic methods using Wilcoxon signed rank test|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Esthetic dentistry is emerging as one of the challenging branches of this field. Shade matching of maxillary anterior is one of the tough clinical challenges faced in dentistry. However, spectrophotometer method of shade evaluation is considered as gold standard for measuring tooth color and to provide high level of agreement for the usage of shade selection in dentistry. Investigator should get informed consent from the students before starting the procedure and also should get necessary acquiesce from the ethical committee of the institution. The entire procedure was performed between 12.00 PM and 3.00 PM on a bright sunny day. Color perception may vary among the individual observer, so a single investigator is used in the study., To avoid weariness or prostration of the eye, there should be 5s or 7s interval for the investigator to have a look at the blue color cardboard sheet., To avoid color confusion, makeup and lipstick has to be removed from the subject., The subjects were viewed at the eye level by holding the shade tab next to the selected tooth. The shade guide shows variations under fluorescence, incandescence, or daylight., Hue has to be selected first followed by chroma. Shade tab is arranged alphabetically from A to D and values from 1 to 4. Digital photography is the third method used in this study. Recently visual method of shade selection has been replaced by the digital means. This is because it can exactly replicate the color with its high imaging quality. 18% gray card is used in this study for standardization. A gray card is a middle reference point to produce constant image. The red, blue, and green values are equal for gray card and hence it is considered as a neutral target. As the gray card had an unquestionable value, the Adobe Photoshop CS6 also integrates as gray and thus removes the shades of particular color, which affects the photographic image partially or completely. The image was captured as a measured distance of 70cm between camera and patient and the proceed image was transferred to Adobe CS Photoshop to get images of the L, a, and b values. The L, a, and b values are again transformed into L*, a*, and b* by using rule L* = L1 × 100/255, a* = (a1 − 128) × 240/255, and b* = (b1 − 128) × 240/255. The difference in shade (ΔE) between spectrophotometric and digital photography was intended by using the following formula: ΔE = [(L1 − L2)² + (a1 − a2)² + (b1 − b2)²]1/2. If ΔE values should be less than or equal to 2, when more than 2 it is considered that human eye is not perceptible to such values.
| Summary and Conclusion|| |
Although dental spectrophotometer is reliable in selecting the shade, it is not easily available to all the clinicians. Digital camera is a common gadget, used in almost every clinic. Numerous clinical studies have established that digitally assisted shade evaluation is more precise when compared with conventional method. When compared to spectrophotometric method, digital method of shade selection is economically low and when compared to conventional method, it records in a detailed manner to perform patient education, documentation of records, and treatments. So with certain limitations of the study, the conclusion is that both visual and digital methods of shade selection show high statistically significance of agreement with spectrophotometer.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Tsiliagkou A, Diamantopoulou S, Papazoglou E, Kakaboura A Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental colour-matching devices. Int J Esthet Dent 2016;11:1-15.
Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S Color and translucency of in vivo
natural central incisor. J Prosthet Dent 2008;83:418-23.
Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Aartman IH, Feilzer AJ Relation in color of three regions of vital human incisors. Dent Mater 2004;20:832-8.
Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater 2009;25:276-81.
Yilmaz B, Karaagaclioglu L In vitro
evaluation of color replication of metal ceramic specimens using visual and instrumental color determinants. J Prosthet Dent 2010;105:21-7.
Wang J, Lin J, Gil M, Seliger A, Da Silva JD, Ishikawa-Nagai S Assessing the accuracy of computer color matching with a new dental porcelain shade system. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:247-53.
Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R Advances in color matching. Dent Clin N Am 2004;48:341-58.
Moodley DS, Patel N, Moodley T, Ranchod H Comparison of colour differences in visual versus spectrophotometric shade matching. SADJ 2015;70:402-07.
Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007;16:93-100.
Paravina RD Performance assessment of dental shade guides. J Dent 2009;375:e15-20.
Öngül D, Şermet B, Balkaya MC Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:9-14.
Gozalo-Diaz D, Johnston WM, Wee AG Estimating the color of maxillary central incisors based on age and gender. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:93-8.
Sarkis E Color change of some aesthetic dental materials: effect of immersion solutions and finishing of their surfaces. Saudi Dent J 2012;24:85-9.
Bentley C, Leonard RH, Nelson CF, Bentley SA Quantitation of vital bleaching by computer analysis of photographic images. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:809-16.
Land EH The Retinex theory of color vision. Sci Am 1997;237:108-28.
Saleski CG Color, light and shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:263-8.
Mellerio J Light absorption and scatter in the human lens. Vision Res 1971;11:129-41.
Barna GJ, Taylor JW, King GE, Pelleu GB Jr The influence of selected light intensities on color perception within the color range of natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:450-3.
Ballard E, Metz MJ, Harris BT, Metz CJ, Chou J-C, Morton D, et al
. Satisfaction of dental students, faculty, and patients with tooth shade-matching using a spectrophotometer. J Dent Educ 2017;81:545-53.
Verriest G Further studies on acquired deficiency of color discrimination. J Opt Soc Am 1963;53:185-95.
Fransworth D The Fransworth –Munsell 100- Hue and Dichotomous test for color vision. J Opt Soc Am 1943;33:568-78.
Ahn J-S, Lee Y-K Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:18-28.
Lee Y-K, Yu B, Lim JI, Lim H-N Perceived color shift of a shade guide according to the change of illuminant. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:91-9.
Miyajiwala JS, Kheur MG, Patankar AH, Lakha TA Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection: a clinical evaluation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017;17:273-81.
Dagg H, O’Connell B, Claffey N, Byrne D, Gorman C The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:900-4.
Li Q, Wang YN Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:848-54.
Bengel WM Digital photography and the assessment of therapeutic results after bleaching procedures. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:S21-32.
Wee AG, Lindsey DT, Kuo S, Johnstona WM Color accuracy of commercial digital cameras for use in dentistry. Dent Mater 2006;22:553-9.
Jarad FD, Russell MD, Moss BW The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005;199:43-9; discussion 33.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]