Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 1004  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 781-786  

Assessing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation in tertiary-care referral centers in Malaysia


1 Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan, Malaysia
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Serdang, Kajang, Malaysia
4 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
5 Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan, Kuantan, Malaysia

Date of Submission31-Dec-2019
Date of Decision25-Feb-2020
Date of Acceptance29-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication05-Nov-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Che Suraya Zin
Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur.
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_381_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Introduction: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, are now available for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and are often clinically preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin. Data describing adherence and persistence to NOACs in real-life clinical practice in Malaysia are scarce. This study aimed to assess adherence and persistence to NOACs in patients with AF in two tertiary-care referral centers: Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) and Hospital Serdang (HSDG). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included all patients with AF who were treated with NOACs (dabigatran or rivaroxaban) in HKL and HSDG. Data were obtained from medical records and pharmacy databases. Adherence was assessed using proportion of days covered (PDC) over a 1-year duration. High adherence was defined as PDC ≥80%. A gap of >60 days between two consecutive refills was used to define non-persistence. Result: There were 281 patients who met the inclusion criteria, with 54.1% (n = 152) male. There were 75.1% (n = 211) patients on dabigatran and others on rivaroxaban. Only 66.9% (n = 188) of patients achieved high adherence with PDC ≥80% and 69.8% (n = 196) were persistence with >60-day gap over 12 months. Adherence and persistence were both influenced by treatment center, whereas polypharmacy only influenced adherence. Conclusion: Overall adherence and persistence to NOACs were suboptimal and varied between treatment centers, potentially due to institution-specific administrative and clinical practice differences. Clinical care and outcomes can potentially be optimized by identifying factors affecting adherence and persistence and by implementing interventions to improving them.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Malaysia, medication adherence, NOACs, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, OACs, oral anticoagulants


How to cite this article:
Kubas MA, Shabaruddin FH, Mazlan-Kepli W, Jagan N, Mohamed S, Mohamed Nazar NI, Zin CS. Assessing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation in tertiary-care referral centers in Malaysia. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2020;12, Suppl S2:781-6

How to cite this URL:
Kubas MA, Shabaruddin FH, Mazlan-Kepli W, Jagan N, Mohamed S, Mohamed Nazar NI, Zin CS. Assessing adherence and persistence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation in tertiary-care referral centers in Malaysia. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 24];12, Suppl S2:781-6. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2020/12/6/781/300002




   Introduction Top


Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are used to reduce the risk of stroke and mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at moderate-to-high risk of thrombosis events (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2).[1] Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been recently developed and approved as alternatives to vitamin K antagonist (VKAs) such as warfarin for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for prevention of thrombosis in patients with AF.[2]

AF is a chronic disease that often requires long-term pharmacotherapy. Medication non-adherence, according to various measures, can be as high as 30%–50% among patients with chronic diseases and is more prevalent in patients with asymptomatic diseases such as AF and VTE.[3],[4] Adherence can be additionally challenging for patients with AF as the majority are elderly with multiple comorbidities and requiring various medications.[5]

NOAC is relatively new within clinical practice in Malaysia with limited practice-based data on its use. This study aimed to assess the patterns of adherence and persistence to NOACs within clinical practice in Malaysia.


   Materials and Methods Top


Setting

This is an observational retrospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary-care referral centers in Malaysia: Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) and Hospital Serdang (HSDG). These two study sites were selected as they have among the highest number of NOAC prescriptions compared to other Ministry of Health centers in Malaysia. Data were obtained from electronic pharmacy dispensing records, treatment-center databases, and relevant records. Patient-level data reflected dispensing from the period between June 2012 and June 2019. Ethics approval from Medical Research Ethical Committee (MREC) was obtained with National Medical Research Register (NMRR) number (NMRR-17-3020-38667).

Study population

Patients with documented AF diagnosis were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) aged ≥18 years on the index date; (2) were prescribed and dispensed dabigatran or rivaroxaban; (3) have continuous medical and pharmacy records from the index-date until the end of study period (i.e., minimum 1 year in order to describe 12-month adherence); and (4) first dispensing refill reported between 2012 and 2018. The index-date was defined as the first date of dispensing of NOACs. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were the selected index-agents because these are the most commonly prescribed NOACs in these treatment centers. Patients with defaulted follow-ups were excluded from this study.

Outcomes and study measures

Adherence is defined as “the extent to which a person’s behavior (including medication taking) corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider”[6] and was assessed for patients with AF for at least 1 year. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC), which is the preferred method of Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA).[7] PDC denominator was defined as the number of days from the index-date until the end of study period, where adherence is measured over 12 months and over 24 months, whereas the numerator was defined as the days of medication covered through the study period based on the dispensing refill records. High adherence for an individual patient was defined at as PDC ≥80%.[7] The sensitivity analysis explored high adherence defined as PDC ≥90%.

Persistence is defined as “the interval between the date of the first prescription and the point at which an unacceptable gap between prescription refills occurs.”[8] Treatment non-persistence for NOACs was defined as a gap of more than 60 days within a 1-year period.[9] The sensitivity analysis explored treatment non-persistence at a gap of more than 30 days. Statistical analysis was also conducted to identify factors that influenced adherence and persistence in the study population, using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software program, version 25.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA).


   Results Top


There were 281 patients who met the inclusion criteria out of 481 patients, who were screened in both treatment centers. The majority of patients were above 60 years old, with various comorbidities and scored ≥3 on the Charlson Comorbidity Index, had high risks of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) and bleeding (HAS-BLED score ≥1) and had no prior OACs use. All patients were receiving concomitant medication alongside NOACs. Dabigatran was the most frequently used NOACs in this study population. The baseline characteristics of the study population alongside the findings on adherence and persistence are presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Baseline characteristics, adherence, and persistence of the study population

Click here to view


Adherence for PDC ≥80% and PDC ≥90% were (66.9%, n = 188/281) and (55.2%, n = 155/281), respectively, at 12 months. Adherence at 24 months improved compared to at 12 months for both PDC ≥80% (83.0%, n = 112/135) and PDC ≥90% (68.9%, n = 93/135). Two factors were found to significantly influence adherence, which were the treatment center at 12 months and polypharmacy (≥5 concurrent medications) at 24 months. Persistence for 60- and 30-day gaps were (69.8%, n = 196/281) and (58.4%, n = 164/281), respectively, within a 12-month period. Treatment center was the only factor that influenced persistence. The results of the logistic regression that identified factors associated with high adherence and persistence are presented in [Table 2].
Table 2: Factors associated with high adherence and persistence for the study population

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The main findings in this study are as follows: 12-month adherence was suboptimal with one-third of patients being non-adherent; adherence at 24 months improved compared to at 12 months. Adherence was influenced by treatment center and polypharmacy. Persistence was also suboptimal with one-third of patients being non-persistent; and was only influenced by treatment center.

Previous studies in various countries have described adherence to NOACs by PDC in patients with AF to be between 45.2% and 93.6%.[10],[11] The findings of this study are within this range. Variations of adherence to NOACs in patients with AF between studies could potentially be related to multiple factors including differences between health-care settings, period of evaluation, administrative policies, clinical practice, interaction between physician and patients, patients’ education level and knowledge, medical conditions, risk of adverse events, and socioeconomic status of the patients.[12],[13] Awareness about these predictors and efforts to identify relevant factors within a patient population and subsequently overcoming them are important steps to improve adherence to NOACs within an institution.

Adherence over 12 months in our study population was 66.9% and improved over 24 months to 83.0%. This is in contrast to other studies which found NOACs adherence to decrease over time between 6 and 24 months.[9],[11],[14] The improved adherence over 24 months in this study could potentially be influenced by attrition of less adherent patients, either by transfer to other institutions or by mortality. However, institutional data was not available to explore this further.

Adherence was significantly influenced by two factors: treatment center at 12 months and polypharmacy at 24 months. Higher adherence rate in HKL over the first 12 months is potentially due to administrative differences between the two institutions. In HKL, there is a centralized NOAC clinic with dedicated specialists providing clinical care within a structured process of care where patients on NOACs receive specialized and personalized clinical management alongside counselling by pharmacists. In HSDG, only physicians from the cardiology department could prescribe NOACs but there was no dedicated process of care specific to patients on NOACs. It is also possible that there were differences in the pharmacy supply stock of NOACs between these two institutions, where a stable supply would lead to higher adherence as measured by PDC, but the retrospective design did not allow further exploration of this.

At 24 months, only polypharmacy was found to significantly influence adherence, with patients without polypharmacy being more likely to be adherent. Polypharmacy has been found to be adversely associated with medication adherence in various studies potentially due to a high likelihood for missing doses and increased complexity of pharmacotherapy regimens,[15],[16] with a majority of studies describing polypharmacy as negatively influencing medication adherence.[15]

Current evidence has described adherence to be linked to health outcomes, with poor adherence to NOACs found to be an important predictor for increased risk of all-cause mortality and stroke, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.13 and 1.54, respectively.[5],[17] The suboptimal adherence in this study indicates that health outcomes could potentially be improved in this study population by implementing suitable interventions and improved clinical care to enhance adherence, particularly as the simplicity of NOAC regimens can also counterintuitively lead to poor adherence due to reduced routine follow-up and its indication for stroke prevention in generally asymptomatic patients with AF.[18] This is especially so as nearly all of the patients in this study had CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 2 and above, which has been found have nearly three times [HR 2.73] higher risk of stroke compared to patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores 0–1.[18]

Persistence in the study population, at 69.8%, was close to the upper level found in other studies in patients with AF with similar study design and definitions, which ranged between 31.6%[9] and 82.8%.[19] Persistence over 12 months for both 30- and 60-day gaps was only significantly influenced by treatment center with persistence observed to be better in HKL compared to HSDG. This observation may be due to the same factors discussed above that may have influenced adherence.

Despite being conducted in two tertiary-care referral centers with a catchment population of more than 1 million people within the Klang Valley, this study identified a relatively small number of patients with AF on NOACs. This reflected the currently limited use of NOACs within Ministry of Health (MoH) tertiary-care referral centers, with various administrative prescribing restrictions applied which allow only selected specialties and consultants to prescribe NOACs to a limited number of patients. This restriction on NOACs prescribing is likely due to the comparatively high acquisition cost of NOACs, which has been estimated to be around MYR2945 per patient annually for dabigatran and MYR2894 per patient annually for rivaroxaban compared to only MYR651 per patient for warfarin.[20]

Care must be taken when generalizing the findings of this study. These findings were based on the availability and accuracy of the electronic pharmacy dispensing records, treatment-center databases, and relevant records in the study institutions. As measuring adherence by PDC reflects the amount of medication dispensed over a period of time, a stable pharmacy supply would contribute to higher PDC adherence rate. It is also possible that some patients could have obtained NOACs from community pharmacies and primary care clinics, which could potentially have influenced adherence. The retrospective design did not allow further exploration of these factors between the two study institutions. Without national health-care databases available across all health-care institutions and community pharmacies nationwide, conducting a more comprehensive assessment of persistence and adherence from secondary resources remained challenging. The resource intensive and time-consuming nature of the data collection process in this study pointed to a need to develop large and well-validated national databases to monitor routine clinical care, which could inform improvement of health-care service delivery and optimization of health outcomes in Malaysia.


   Conclusion Top


Adherence and persistence of patients with AF on NOACs in this study population were suboptimal but were within the ranges documented in the literature. Variations of adherence and persistence between the two study institutions indicated that incorporating adherence enhancing measures within routine clinical care with dedicated specialized services, such as having dedicated NOACs clinics with follow-up clinical care and pharmacists’ counselling, can have a positive impact on adherence and persistence.

Financial support and sponsorship

CSZ was supported by a research grant from the Ministry of Education Malaysia (Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, FRGS 19-010-0618).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:857-67.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;50:e1-88.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Loghman-Adham M Medication noncompliance in patients with chronic disease: issues in dialysis and renal transplantation. Am J Manag Care 2003;9:155-71.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Doggrell SA Adherence to medicines in the older-aged with chronic conditions: Does intervention by an allied health professional help? Drugs Aging 2010;27:239-54.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Borne RT, O’Donnell C, Turakhia MP, Varosy PD, Jackevicius CA, Marzec LN, et al. Adherence and outcomes to direct oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the Veterans Health Administration. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:236.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Nau DP Proportion of days covered (PDC) as a preferred method of measuring medication adherence. Springfield, VA: Pharmacy Quality Alliance; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Caetano PA, Lam JM, Morgan SG Toward a standard definition and measurement of persistence with drug therapy: examples from research on statin and antihypertensive utilization. Clin Ther 2006;28:1411-24; discussion 1410.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Manzoor BS, Lee TA, Sharp LK, Walton SM, Galanter WL, Nutescu EA Real-world adherence and persistence with direct oral anticoagulants in adults with atrial fibrillation. Pharmacotherapy 2017;37:1221-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Forslund T, Wettermark B, Hjemdahl P Comparison of treatment persistence with different oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2016;72:329-38.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Brown JD, Shewale AR, Talbert JC Adherence to rivaroxaban, dabigatran, and apixaban for stroke prevention for newly diagnosed and treatment-naive atrial fibrillation patients: an update using 2013–2014 data. J Managed Care Spec Pharm 2017;23:958-67.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mathews R, Wang W, Kaltenbach LA, Thomas L, Shah RU, Ali M, et al. Hospital variation in adherence rates to secondary prevention medications and the implications on quality. Circulation 2018;137:2128-38.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ewen S, Rettig-Ewen V, Mahfoud F, Böhm M, Laufs U Drug adherence in patients taking oral anticoagulation therapy. Clin Res Cardiol 2014;103:173-82.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Coleman CI, Tangirala M, Evers T Medication adherence to rivaroxaban and dabigatran for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the United States. Int J Cardiol 2016;212:171-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Marcum ZA, Gellad WF Medication adherence to multidrug regimens. Clin Geriatr Med 2012;28:287-300.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gellad WF, Grenard JL, Marcum ZA A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2011;9:11-23.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Shore S, Carey EP, Turakhia MP, Jackevicius CA, Cunningham F, Pilote L, et al. Adherence to dabigatran therapy and longitudinal patient outcomes: insights from the Veterans Health Administration. Am Heart J 2014;167: 810-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Yao X, Abraham NS, Alexander GC, Crown W, Montori VM, Sangaralingham LR, et al. Effect of adherence to oral anticoagulants on risk of stroke and major bleeding among patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e003074.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Johnson ME, Lefèvre C, Collings SL, Evans D, Kloss S, Ridha E, et al. Early real-world evidence of persistence on oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cohort study in UK primary care. BMJ Open 2016;6:e011471.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Looi W, Tan S, Yeo H, Selamat AA, Hanif AA, Priyadarshini C Comparative treatment cost, effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients: a descriptive study from Penang General Hospital (PGH). Int J Cardiol 2017;249:S23-24.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed819    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded1    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal