|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 229-232
Remineralization of artificial dentin lesion In vitro using dental nano-materials
Roshni U Rai1, Ravi Ranjan2, Mukesh Kumar3, Uzma Mukri4, Nutan Mala5, Kunal Kumar6
1 Consultant Endodontist, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Consultant Orthodontist, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India
3 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sarjung Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India
4 Consultant Orthodontist, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
5 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Patna, India
6 BDS, Private Practitioner, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India
|Date of Submission||22-Oct-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||27-Oct-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||05-Jun-2021|
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Buddha Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Patna, Bihar
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Teeth in the human body are the most mineralized tissue, which contain both organic and inorganic components. Demineralization and remineralization of teeth occur continuously, but demineralization causes structural loss of a tooth. Aim: This study was done to find the effect of ceramic by adding mono-n-Dodecyl phosphate to ceramic in dentin remineralization. Materials and Methods: A total of sixty permanent intact tooth specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups: Group 1: control group, Group 2: dentin was etched and restored with plain ceramic restoration, Group 3: etched dentin restored with ceramic containing 2% mono-n-Dodecyl phosphate, and Group 4: etched dentin restored with ceramic containing 5% mono-n-Dodecyl phosphate. Each sample was immersed completely in simulated body fluid and was kept in an incubator at 37°C to simulate the human body environment. Knoop microhardness measurements were recorded at 10, 20, and 38 days. Results: Knoop microhardness of dentin (KHN) reduced to 32.6% after dentin was etched. No significant difference was found between group 2, 3 and 4 after 10 days. KHN value was increased and showed significant changes restored with group 2 and 3, group 3 showed nonsignificant changes. Conclusion: Through this study, we found that Ceramic can be used as a remineralizing agent to restore marginal dentine around of the cavity and root lesions from secondary caries.
Keywords: Ceramic restoration, ACP-amorphous calcium phosphate, dentine remineralization, Knoop hardness number
|How to cite this article:|
Rai RU, Ranjan R, Kumar M, Mukri U, Mala N, Kumar K. Remineralization of artificial dentin lesion In vitro using dental nano-materials. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2021;13, Suppl S1:229-32
|How to cite this URL:|
Rai RU, Ranjan R, Kumar M, Mukri U, Mala N, Kumar K. Remineralization of artificial dentin lesion In vitro using dental nano-materials. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 27];13, Suppl S1:229-32. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2021/13/5/229/317631
| Introduction|| |
Teeth are the highly mineralized tissue in the human body, which contain both organic and inorganic components. Wear and remineralization of teeth occur continuously, but demineralization causes structural loss of a tooth. Many dietary carbohydrates undergo fermentation, which produces acidogenic bacteria. Which further produces lactic acid, propionic acid, acetic acid leads to demineralization of enamel and dentine., As dentine undergo ageing, numerous changes takes place to alter biomechanics and biochemistry of tissue.,
Many approaches have been implicated for remineralizing demineralized dentin. Recently, fluoride, amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), or resin-based adhesives containing bioactive glass are novel approaches introduced to improve the resistance of bonded restorations to secondary caries. However, many of the studies focused on remineralizing partially demineralized carious dentin, which was based on the concept of epitaxial deposition of calcium and phosphate ions over the existing apatite seed crystallites.
In this study, dentin remineralization was evaluated by altering microhardness of dentin surface around ceramic.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Sixty permanent, noncarious, upper and lower, anterior and posterior teeth were selected, which underwent extraction for orthodontic or periodontic reasons and stored in 0.5% chlorophyll solution. Carious teeth were excluded.
Before the initiation of study, all teeth were cleaned by a ultrasonic scaler and casted in self-cure dental acrylic resin, only exposing the buccal and lingual surfaces of the tooth. Then, the buccal/lingual surfaces were wet grounded to obtain a smooth dentin by using grits, and final polishing was done by using alumina powder to obtain a smooth and polished surface. The mean Knoop hardness number [KHN] microhardness value was calculated by making four indentations in the dentin surface.
Demineralization and cavity preparation
To evaluate the outcome, initially, the dentin was demineralized and etching was done by 37% phosphoric acid for 5 s to expose the dentin collagen. All the specimens were soaked in deionized water and then dried, after which, KHN of the etched dentin was evaluated.
A total of sixty tooth specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups as follows:
- Group 1: Control group
- Group 2: Dentin was etched and restored with plain ceramic restoration
- Group 3: Etched dentin restored with Ceramic containing 2% mono-n-Dodecyl phosphate
- Group 4: Etched dentin restored with Ceramic containing 5% mono-n-Dodecyl phosphate.
Ceramic capsules were mixed using an amalgamator for 5 s according to manufacturer's instructions. For Groups 3 and 4, 2% and 5% surfactant i.e. mono-n-dodoecyl phosphate mixed with ceramic. Then, mono-n-Dodecyl phosphate (surfactant) powder was weighed at 2% and 5% concentration and mixed with ceramic paste.
For keeping the specimen simulated, body fluid (SBF) was prepared according to the instructions of the International Organization for Standardization. [Table 1] lists the reagents which were required for the SBF solution. SBF was kept in a plastic bottle, and each sample was immersed entirely and was kept in an incubator at 37°C to simulate the human body environment.
KHN test was done at 10, 20, and 38 days of interval. At each test, four indentations were made on the sample of approximately 75 μm area away from the filling margin in the dentin surface.
At each interval, the mean KHN of all teeth in each group was calculated. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to evaluate dentin surface after every testing period.
Data were expressed in KHN, and ANOVA was applied to analyze repeated measure amongst group using SPSS 21.0 Armonk (2012). Statistical significance was set at P = 0.05.
| Results|| |
ANOVA showed the increase in KHN values of Group 2, that is, plain ceramic, which was not significant after 10 days of postrestoration, but after 20 and 38 days of restoration, the KHN value depicted a significant increase in hardness values compared to the etched values. In addition, a significant change was found in the values between 10 and 38 days.[Table 2] showed KHN value significance over different time period for plain ceramic in group 2, 3 and 4. Follow up for 10 days, 20 days and 38 days showed no statistical significance as depicted in [Table 3]. KHN values of Group 3 were statistically not significant (P < 0.05) after 10 days of restoration. After 20 and 38 days of restoration, a statistically significant increase in hardness values versus etched values. Also, 10 versus 20 versus 38 days, shows statistically significant change. Group 4 showed increase in KHN values which were statistically not significant after 10 days of restoration. After 20 and 38 days of restoration, there was a significant increase in hardness values versus etched values. 10 days versus 20 days, 20 days versus 38 days showed no statistical significance as depict in [Table 3].
|Table 2: Knoop hardness number value significance over different time periods for plain ceramic in Groups 2, 3, and 4|
Click here to view
|Table 3: Microhardness values from baseline and etched dentin with time interval in percentage|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This study shows that restoring dentin lesions with ceramic remineralizes dentin by about 75 μm from the margins of the restoration. For this study, etching was done by using 37% phosphoric acid gel to demineralize the dentine surface. The semi-electron micrographs of a specimen which were restored with ceramic restoration showed a nano-size particle covering the dentine surface and filling the dentinal tubules partially.
In our study, we found adding 2% surfactant to ceramic increases the remineralization over time in comparison to plain ceramic restoration, whereas adding 5% surfactant to ceramic does not show significant results as it might decrease the effect of ceramic.
Zhang S et al., (2013) suggested that there are various ways to estimate dentine mineralization, such as SEM and transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, microcadiography, micro-computed tomography scanning, and nano-indentation, to evaluate microhardness.
Resistance to local deformation is known as microhardness. For dental materials, two microhardness tests are commonly used, that is, Knoop and Vickers hardness tests. Both tests can evaluate fracture resistance, modulus of elasticity, and yield strength.
As mineral content increases, Knoop hardness value also increases and vice versa. In our study, KHN was evaluated at a site close to [DEJ], and the results were similar to that of Mahoney et al. Cavalcanti et al. used bio-active glass and polyacrylic acid-modified bioactive glass powders in white spot lesion of enamel and showed that when mineral content increases Knoop hardness value increases. Knoop microhardness values of dentine for baseline measurements range from 70 up to 90 depending on the location of tooth and the area of indentation. Anterior teeth have lower hardness value than posterior teeth. Chanya et al. studied the microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin using a Knoop indenter.
In our study, we used SBF to mimic saliva for providing phosphate, which is used widely for biomineralization. Human saliva was not used for two reasons – first, the duration of the study was long, so sterility might get hampered, and second a large amount of saliva was required, which was difficult to obtain.
| Conclusion|| |
In our study, we found that ceramic can remineralize, demineralized dentin and the rate of remineralization increases by adding 2% surfactant to plain ceramic, while adding 5% surfactant to ceramic cement decreases the remineralization process. Through this study, we found that Ceramic can be used as a demineralizing agent to restore root lesions and marginal dentine which helps to reduce secondary caries. CPP-ACP material has the highest amount of evidence to support its use as a demineralizing agent. Ceramic use still needs to be verified.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Sauro S, Osorio R, Osorio E, Watson TF, Toledano M. Novel light-curable materials containing experimental bioactive micro-fillers Remineralise mineral-depleted bonded-dentine interfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2013;24:940-56.
Klont B, ten Cate JM. Remineralization of bovine incisor root lesions in vitro
: The role of the collagenous matrix. Caries Res 1991;25:39-45.
Liu Y, Li N, Qi Y, Niu LN, Elshafiy S, Mao J, et al
. The use of sodium trimetaphosphate as a biomimetic analog of matrix phosphoproteins for remineralization of artificial caries-like dentin. Dent Mater 2011;27:465-77.
Tay FR, Pashley DH. Guided tissue remineralisation of partially demineralised human dentine. Biomaterials 2008;29:1127-37.
Eisenmann DR, Yaeger JA. In-vitro mineralization of hypomineralized dentine induced by strontium and fluoride in the rat. Arch Oral Biol 1972;17:987-99.
Li X, Chang J. Preparation of bone-like apatite-collagen nanocomposites by a biomimetic process with phosphorylated collagen. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;85:293-300.
Saito T, Toyooka H, Ito S, Crenshaw MA. In vitro
study of remineralization of dentin: Effects of ions on mineral induction by decalcified dentin matrix. Caries Res 2003;37:445-9.
Zhang X, Neoh KG, Lin CC, Kishen A. Remineralization of partially demineralized dentine substrate based on a biomimetic strategy. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23:733-42.
Arends J, Ruben JL, Christoffersen J, Jongebloed WL, Zuidgeest TG. Remineralization of human dentine in vitro
. Caries Res 1990;24:432-5.
Kawasaki K, Ruben J, Stokroos I, Takagi O, Arends J. The remineralization of EDTA-treated human dentine. Caries Res 1999;33:275-80.
Sauro S, Toledano M, Aguilera FS, Mannocci F, Pashley DH, Tay FR, et al
. Resin-dentin bonds to EDTA-treated vs. acid-etched dentin using ethanol wet-bonding. Dent Mater 2010;26:368-79.
Bertassoni LE, Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. Mechanical recovery of dentin following remineralization in vitro
An indentation study. J Biomech 2011;44:176-81.
Van Meerbeck B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al
. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-42.
Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs. bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1992;8:229-33.
Currey JD, Brear K. Young's modulus and yield strength in mammalian mineralized tissues. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1990;1:14-20.
Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: An ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent 2000;28:589-94.
Cavalcanti AN, Mitsui FH, Lima AF, Mathias P, Marchi GM. Evaluation of dentin hardness and bond strength at different walls of class II preparations. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:183-8.
Chanya C, Pojjanut B, Paitoon D. Effect of indentation load and time on Knoop and Vickers microhardness tests for enamel and dentin. Mater Res 2009;12:473-6.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]