Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 3709  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1074-1078  

A comprehensive cross-tabulation analysis of oral carcinoma patients: A retrospective study of recent 7 years


1 Unit of Biostatistics, School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, UniversitiSains Malaysia (USM), 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
2 Dental Intern, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
3 Oral Medicine and Radiology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
4 Periodontics, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
5 Orthodontics, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Submission25-Feb-2021
Date of Decision12-Apr-2021
Date of Acceptance17-Jun-2021
Date of Web Publication10-Nov-2021

Correspondence Address:
Wan Muhamad Amir W Ahmad
School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan
Malaysia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_105_21

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background and Objectives: According to the global cancer situation, which is very alarming, with over 10 million new diagnoses and more than 6 million deaths each year globally, cancer is one of the most prominent causes of morbidity and mortality today. One of the cancers is oral cancer. Oral cancer is the irregular development of malignant cells in the oral cavity. The study's objective was to decide the mortality of cross-tabulation among patients treated for oral carcinoma from Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Kelantan, Malaysia. Materials and Methods: This chapter summarizes the medical history for 7 years from January 2011 to December 2018 of patients who have been treated for oral carcinoma in the Hospital USM, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) Unit. Each patient's complete medical record was checked, and data gathered were based on age, gender, site lesion, clinical diagnosis, and mortality. Version 26.0 of the SPSS software was used to evaluate the correlation and distribution of patient survival. Results: This was a retrospective cross-sectional review of the medical evidence of 117 patients infected for oral carcinoma at OMFS (Hospital USM). Sixty-seven (57.26%) of the patients were male and fifty (42.74%) were female. Patient age ranged from 25 to 93 years. Malay has the highest prevalence (85.5%) in oral carcinoma, followed by a second ethnic group, Chinese (7.7%). The result indicates that the majority of oral carcinoma patients were over 60 years old.Cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma have proved to be the most prevalent malignant tumour in the mouth cavity. The largest number of cases collected is 91% of the data collected. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (10%) is the second most common small salivary gland tumor. Conclusion: OSCC is the most prevalent kind of oral cancer. According to the data review, the most popular site for oral cancer is the tongue.

Keywords: Cross-tabulation, oral squamous cell carcinoma, pathology


How to cite this article:
Ahmad WM, Ghazali FM, Yaqoob MA, Alawthah GH, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Alam MK. A comprehensive cross-tabulation analysis of oral carcinoma patients: A retrospective study of recent 7 years. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2021;13, Suppl S2:1074-8

How to cite this URL:
Ahmad WM, Ghazali FM, Yaqoob MA, Alawthah GH, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Alam MK. A comprehensive cross-tabulation analysis of oral carcinoma patients: A retrospective study of recent 7 years. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 13];13, Suppl S2:1074-8. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2021/13/6/1074/329935




   Introduction Top


According to the global cancer scenario, cancer is one of the most prominent causes of morbidity and death today. It is very problematic, with more than 10 million new cases and more than 6 million deaths per year worldwide. About 20 million people are diagnosed with cancer worldwide, and more than half of cancer possibilities are in developed countries.[1] High-income countries have 2-fold of all deaths by cancer incidence as compared to low-income countries. Oral cancer is an abnormal growth in the oral cavity by malignant cells. Oral malignant growth was the sixth most common disease among Indian males. According to the National Cancer Registry in 2003, oral cancer was the third most common malignant development among Indian females in Malaysia, with 4.5% and 6.5%, respectively. In terms of gender, oral cancer was the 19th and 16th leading cancer in men and women, respectively. This is closely linked to the pattern of smoking cigarettes, betel quid chewing, and excessive alcohol intake. In the meantime, oral cancer in the 2007 National Cancer Registry study is the 21st most prevalent cancer in the general population. There were 353 recorded cases of oral cancer which affected 171 males and 182 females. Oral cancer is the third most common cancer among Malaysian Indians in Ministry of Health hospitals, according to the Malaysia Cancer Incidence survey. Heavy tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, a diet deficient in fruit and vegetables, betel nut chewing and poor oral hygiene, infection with sexually transmitted human papillomavirus (HPV) (especially type HPV 16), and sun exposure are the predisposing factors for oral cancer. Based on the studies, the survival rate of oral cancer in Australia was 83.3%, 55.6% in Taiwan, and 28.6% in Sao Paulo, Brazil.[2],[3],[4],[5] Meanwhile, Malaysia's 5-year survival rate was just 18.0%, much lower than in other research.[6]

The prevalence of age, gender, and ethnicity of oral cancer patients

According to a previous Ghazali et al. study, Kelantan's prevalence of oral cancer is 12.6%.[7] Oral cancer occurs mainly in the elderly. Warnakulasuriya has stated that the risk of contracting oral cancer increases with age, with most cases occurring in people 50 and over.[8] In the United States of America, the median age of diagnosis of oral cancer is 62 years old[9] and in Iraq was 60 years above age group.[10] However, the prevalence of oral cancer is growing in individuals under the age of 45 years.[8] Clinical research has found that oral cancer affected males by 1.6 times more compared to females.[7] The prevalence of males affected with oral cancer is 58.3% and of females is 41.7%.[11] This is due to exposure to lifestyle-related carcinogenic factors and dietary patterns, such as smoking, alcohol, and chewing betel nuts.[6],[12],[13] In Malaysia, there are various ethnicities, such as Malays, Chinese, Indians, and others. Based on the previous study of oral cancer in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), the proportion of oral cancer cases for the Malays (82%), Chinese (6%), Indians (6%), and others (6%).[7]

The site of lesion of oral cancer

The location of the lesion depends on the prevailing risk factors. Tongue is the most common site of lesion in European and U. S. populations, which makes up about 40%–50% of oral cancer.[8] In the meantime, in Asian cultures, oral mucosa is more prevalent due to smoking and betel nut chewing.[8] In addition, in the Madrid analysis by Moreno-López et al., the most frequent location is also the tongue (34.7%), followed by the mouth floor (18.6%) and the labial mucosa (16%).[14] Furthermore, Prasan found that the tongue, followed by the cheek and mouth floor, was the most common position.[15] In addition, the most common causes of oral cancer are the tongue and oral mucosa.

The risk factors of oral cancer

The risk factors of oral cancer are multifactorial. The most important risk factors are tobacco use,[12],[14],[16],[17] betel nut chewing,[17] and excessive alcohol intake.[11],[14],[17] Other than that, poor oral hygiene[12],[14],[17] and a terrible eating routine may likewise add to oral malignancy. Smoking was reported to be the most practiced habit in patients (60.2%), accompanied by betel nut chewing (18.2%) and alcohol intake (5.7%) in Hospital USM from January 2000 to December 2005.[16] Most patients in India consumed tobacco (88.5%), a danger factor in oral malignancy development.

The association of mortality with the site of lesion and tumor-node-metastasis stage of oral cancer

Age-adjusted oral cancer mortality rates have been estimated at 3–4 per 100,000 males and 1.5–2.0 per 100,000 females in most countries.[8] Based on the previous study (MohdKhairi et al., 2009), the mortality of the patients is significantly influenced by the site of the disease.[16] In the study reported, from 88 patients diagnosed with oral cancer, 11 (12.5%) died.[16] The highest number of deaths was associated with cancer of the palate (33%) and tonsils (33%), then followed by buccal mucosa (15.5%), tongue (14.8%), and salivary gland (4.2%).[16] The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) score is used in comparing the severity of the disease as well as predicting the mortality rate of patients. There were 39 advanced cases (Stage III and IV) in the prior study, 9 (23.1%) of which died, while just 2 (4.7%) perished in the localized stage (Stage I and II).[16]


   Materials and Methods Top


The study was carried out retrospectively by examining the medical records of oral carcinomas in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Hospital USM, Kelantan, Malaysia, from January 2011 to December 2018. The previous medical reports were carefully reviewed, collecting and recording the site of lesion in the oral cavity, risk factors, oral cancer histopathologically, stage of TNM, and mortality. Patient demographic profile was included, like age, ranging from 25 to 93 years, and was classified as <30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, >60, class, and ethnicity. The Statistical package for social sciences - version 23, Chicago, IL, USA has been used for the statistical analysis. The distribution of oral carcinoma sites among registered patients was assessed through a descriptive analysis and cross-tabulation analysis. Thirteen recorded lesion sites were included in this analysis. The reported locations were “tongue, buccal mucosa, palate, lip, mouth floor, salivary gland, mandible, maxilla, left alveolus of maxilla, left alveolus of mandible, right alveolus of mandible, left alveolar mucosa of mandible, right alveolar mucosa of mandible” tabulated by mortality status (survival or death) and pathology type (squamous cell carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma).


   Results Top


One hundred seventeen patients with 618 oral cancers were included in this retrospective study, of which 67 (57.26%) were male and 50 (42.74%) were female. The male-to-female ratio was about 1:1 [Figure 1]. Many patients come from a group that is over 60 years old. [Figure 2] shows the prevalence of oral carcinoma according to ethnicity. [Figure 3] displays the prevalence of oral carcinoma according to age group. The frequency of the most common sites of the lesion is shown in [Figure 4].
Figure 1: Prevalence of oral carcinoma according to gender. 57.26% in blue represents the predominantly affected male, whereas 42.74% in red represents the affected female population

Click here to view
Figure 2: Prevalence of oral carcinoma according to ethnicity. 85.47% in blue represents the Malay ethnic, 7.69% Chinese, 1.71 Indians, and 5.13% others

Click here to view
Figure 3: Prevalence of oral carcinoma according to age group. 44.44% in age group >60 is the age group most afflicted with oral carcinoma

Click here to view
Figure 4: Frequency of the most common sites of the lesion. According to the obtained graph, tongue having the highest frequency, which is 54.70%, and the second highest is referred to salivary gland 11.97%

Click here to view


According to [Table 1], the distribution of patient status within 7 years is being analyzed. Among the percentage of survival, there are 62.5% of patients with tongue lesion, and 37.5% have died. The second most common type of lesion is buccal mucosa; 61.5% of patients survived, while 38.5% died.
Table 1: Distribution of patient status within 7 years

Click here to view


The cross-tabulation of the pathology against the lesion site is shown in [Table 2]. According to [Table 2], oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignant epithelial neoplasm that affects the oral cavity. The vast majority of malignant epithelial neoplasms can be classified as squamous cell carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma. The most common lesion site is in the tongue. The distribution between the pathology type and the position of the lesion is illustrated in [Figure 5]. [Figure 5] indicates that the most common pathology in the oral cavity is squamous cell carcinoma.
Table 2: Cross-tabulation pathology site of lesion

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


A few articles were published on the cross-tabulation analysis of oral carcinoma according to histopathological subtype with the specific site of the lesion. According to the study for 7 years of the patient records, the common sites are the buccal mucosa, tongue, and salivary gland. The most common pathology in the oral cavity is OSCC. In general, men are more likely to expose to the prevalence of oral cancer, which was about 57.26% compared to females (47.74%). This study discovered that the Malay ethnic group has a prevalence of 85.47%, the Chinese ethnic group has roughly 7.69%, Indians have 1.71%, and other ethnic groups have a 5.13%. From the analysis, it was found that patients above 51 years old are more exposed to oral cancer compared to other age groups. Based on previous studies in Malaysia, the mean age presentation of oral cancer was 59.1 years old,[7] 57.2 years old,[11] and 55.1 years old.[16] The result had shown that tongue constituted 54.70% and salivary gland was 14 (11.9%). Oral mucosa (54%), tongue (16.6%), gingival (14%), lip (6.6%), and hard palate (4.3%) were the most popular sites involved in India. Meanwhile, a study by MohdKhairi et al. stated tongue (30.7%), then salivary gland (27.3%), buccal mucosa (14.8%), and palate (10.2%) as the prevalent site.[16] Identical to the results in the study done by Chen et al. (2004), found that the tongue (42.8%), buccal mucosa (16%), gingiva (10.4%), and palate (10.1%).[4]


   Conclusion Top


This paper examines the most common distribution of pathology type for oral carcinoma. According to the result, the highest case is from squamous cell carcinoma (77.78%), the second-highest type is mucoepidermoid carcinoma (8.55%), and the third in rank is adenoid cystic carcinoma (7.70%), followed by acinic cell carcinoma (2.56%) and others (3.42%). In 7 years of recorded data for oral carcinoma patients, the most frequent location for lesion is tongue 62 (68.1%), followed by salivary gland 14 (12%) and buccal mucosa 13 (11.1%). Among tongue cases, 40 (62.5%) cases are survived, and 24 (37.5%) have died. Biplot analysis [Figure 5] had shown that the sites of lip, mandible, buccal mucosa, and tongue are near to the squamous cell carcinoma. That means that most of the lip, mandible, buccal mucosa, and tongue involvement cases are cases originated from squamous cell carcinoma. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma mostly present near to palatal and maxilla bone which means carcinoma arises from these two sites are mostly mucoepidermoid carcinoma. The salivary gland is close to acinic cell carcinoma, which corresponds to acinic cell carcinoma being the most frequently discovered cancer type at the salivary gland.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the Medical Record Unit, Hospital USM, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. This work was supported by the Incentive Graduate On Time (GOT), School of Dental Sciences, Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Grant Number: 1001/PPSG/8123051.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Petersen PE. K1. Oral Cancer Prevention and Control - The approach of The World Health Organization. Oral Oncology Supplement. 2009; 3(1);8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Health, P. B. The Malaysian National Cancer Registry Report (MNCR) 2007-2011. Retrieved January 05, 2018, from https://kpkesihatan.com/2016/12/07/the-malaysian-national-cancer-registry-report-mncr-2007-2011/;2016.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Chandu A, Adams G, and Smith A.C.H. Factors affecting survival in patients with oral cancer: an Australian perspective. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2005;34(5);514-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chen PH, Ko YC, Yang YH, Lin YC, Shieh TY, Chen CH, et al. Important prognostic factors of long-term oropharyngeal carcinoma survivors in Taiwan. Oral Oncol 2004;40:847-55.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pires FR, Ramos AB, Oliveira JB, Tavares AS, Luz PS, Santos TC. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: clinicopathological features from 346 cases from a single oral pathology service during an 8-year period. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013; 21(5):460-467. doi:10.1590/1679-775720130317.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Razak AA, Sadki N, Naing NN, and Abdullah N. (2010). Oral cancer survival among Malay patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2010;11(1);187-91.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ghazali N, Zain RB., Samsudin AR., and Raman RA. The Incidence of Mouth, Tongue and Lip Cancers in Kelantan, Malaysia. Malaysian Dental Journal. 2006;27(2);82-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Warnakulasuriya S. Global Epidemiology of Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer. Oral Oncology. 2009; 45;309-16.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Feller L, and Lemmer J. Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation and Treatment. Journal of Cancer Therapy. 2012;03(04);263-68.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Museedi OS, and Younis WH. Oral cancer trends in Iraq from 2000 to 2008. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research. 2014;5(1);41-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Zainab AB, Fatihah M, Noor Maizura MN, and Zainul AR. Demographic Profile of Oral Cancer Patients in East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. International Medical Journal. 2013;20(3);342-44.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Blot WB, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, and Austin DF. Smoking and Drinking in Relation to Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer. Cancer Research. 1988;48;3282-87.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Pinholt, EM, Rindum, J, and Pindborg J. J. Oral Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 100 Danish Cases. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1997;35(2);77-80.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Moreno-López L, Esparza-Gómez G, González-Navarro A, Cerero-Lapiedra R, González-Hernández M, and Domínguez-Rojas V. Risk of Oral Cancer Associated with Tobacco Smoking, Alcohol Consumption and Oral Hygiene: A Case Control Study in Madrid, Spain. Oral Oncology. 2000;36(2);170-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Devi Prasan. Clinico-Pathological Study of Oral Cancers. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2015;14(6);5-38.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mohd Khairi MD, Normastura AR, Azizah Y, and Mahdan, M.H.A. Oral cancer: a retrospective study of cases registered in Hospital Univerisiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM), Kelantan, Malaysia. International Medical Journal. 2009;16(1);31-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Petti S. Lifestyle Risk Factors For Oral Cancer. Oral Oncology. 2009;45(4-5);340-50.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed366    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded50    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal