Retention of various luting agents used with implant-supported crowns

Santhosh Sathyanarayan; Tamizhesai Balavadivel; Rakshit C Guru; Abhijeet Rajendra Sande; Venkateswaran Rajendran; Arul Kumar Sengottaiyan

doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_385_21

Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences

	Login \| Users Online: 3810
	Home \| About us \| Editorial board \| Search \| Ahead of print \| Current Issue \| Past Issues \| Instructions \| Online submission

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Year : 2021 | Volume : 13 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1206-1209

Retention of various luting agents used with implant-supported crowns

Santhosh Sathyanarayan¹, Tamizhesai Balavadivel², Rakshit C Guru¹, Abhijeet Rajendra Sande³, Venkateswaran Rajendran⁴, Arul Kumar Sengottaiyan⁵
¹ Department of Prosthodontics, ESIC Dental College, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India
² Department of Prosthodontics, Tagore Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
³ Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Sciences, KIMSDU, Karad, Maharashtra, India
⁴ Department of Prosthodontics, Asan Memorial Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
⁵ Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Santhosh Sathyanarayan
Department of Prosthodontics, ESIC Dental College, Kalaburagi, Karnataka
India

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Check

DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_385_21

Background: Implant supported crowns can either be screw retained or cement retained. Recent advances in implant dentistry has improved the longevity of the implant restoration and has placed importance on esthetics and function. Cement retained restoration has added advantage of superior esthetics and is preferred by the clinician. However, selecting the ideal type of cement for luting implant supported crown has been a topic of debate. Methodology: A study was conducted at ESIC Dental College & Hospital, Kalaburagi to determine the retentive ability of three different luting agents. 30 samples were divided into three groups and luted with Zinc phosphate, Zinc Polycarboxylate and Glass ionomer cement. The retentive strength was evaluated using universal testing machine. Results: Results proved that zinc poly carboxylate cement had the highest retentive value followed by glass ionomer and zinc phosphate.

[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*

Table of Contents

suppl

Similar in PUBMED

Search Pubmed for

Search in Google Scholar for

Related articles

Citation Manager

Access Statistics

Reader Comments

Email Alert *

Add to My List *

* Requires registration (Free)

Article Access Statistics

Viewed	270

Printed	10

Emailed	0

PDF Downloaded	37

Comments	[Add]