Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 1160  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission

Year : 2021  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 933-937

Bone regenerative biomaterials in periapical surgery: A systemic review and meta-analysis

1 Department of Endodontics, Sebha Dental College, University of Sebha, Sebha, Libya
2 MDS, Consultant Pediatric and Preventive Dentist, Pune, Maharashtra, India
3 Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kannur, Kerala, Pune, India
4 BDS, MPH, Claremont Graduate University, School of Community and Global Health, Claremont, CA, USA
5 Department of BDS, MDS, AS DMD Candidate, Boston University, USA
6 Department of Conservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
7 BDS, PGDHHM, MPH, Final Year Student, Parul Univeristy, Limda, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujrat, India

Correspondence Address:
Heena Tiwari
Parul University, Limda, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_386_21

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Successful treatment in the endodontics and periodontics depends on the periapical status. Hence, in the present meta-analysis, we evaluate the various bone regenerative materials in the periapical surgeries. Materials and Methods: Online data were collected from the search engines of EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The searched terms were bone regenerative, bone grafts, bio materials, periapical surgery, and endodontic surgery. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, the meta-analysis was performed. The studies for the past 10 years were considered that included at least 10 patients. The translatable articles were included that had the human studies that were clinical studies and/or trials and also had the bone regenerative materials used in the procedure. Results: A total of 475 articles were selected, of which 30 were selected based on the criteria. Of these, after the removal of the 21 duplicate articles, 9 articles were finalized. The meta-analysis showed that when the bone graft materials are used along with the barriers for the regeneration, there were observed higher success rates. Conclusions: The bone regenerative materials can be used for the successful outcome for the periapical surgeries. The guided tissue regeneration along with the bone regenerative materials may aid in the good prognosis of the endodontic and periodontal cases.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded79    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal