Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences

: 2015  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 279--281

Loop connectors in dentogenic diastema

Sanjna Nayar, Raghevendra Jayesh, Venkateshwaran, V Dinakarsamy 
 Department of Prosthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sanjna Nayar
Department of Prosthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu


Patients with a missing tooth along with diastema have limited treatment options to restore the edentulous space. The use of a conventional fixed partial denture (FPD) to replace the missing tooth may result in too wide anterior teeth leading to poor esthetics. Loss of anterior teeth with existing diastema may result in excess space available for pontic. This condition presents great esthetic challenge for prosthodontist. If implant supported prosthesis is not possible because of inadequate bone support, FPD along with loop connector may be a treatment option to maintain the diastema and provide optimal esthetic restoration. Here, we report a clinical case where FPD along with loop connector was used to achieve esthetic rehabilitation in maxillary anterior region in which midline diastema has been maintained.

How to cite this article:
Nayar S, Jayesh R, Venkateshwaran, Dinakarsamy V. Loop connectors in dentogenic diastema.J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7:279-281

How to cite this URL:
Nayar S, Jayesh R, Venkateshwaran, Dinakarsamy V. Loop connectors in dentogenic diastema. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Apr 16 ];7:279-281
Available from:

Full Text

Replacing a single tooth in esthetic region has been considered as a challenge for the clinician. Loss of the anterior tooth with existing diastema may result in excess space available for pontic. Various treatment options are available for replacement of single anterior tooth that includes an implant supported prosthesis or conventional fixed partial denture (FPD). This leaves a challenge for prosthodontist whether to close the space or to maintain the space with restoration for a natural appearance. If diastema has to be maintained in restoration and implant is not as treatment option, FPD along with loop connector is the best treatment option. The modified FPD with loop connectors enhance the natural appearance of the restoration; maintain the diastema and proper emergence profile. This clinical report describes a technique to fabricate a three unit porcelin fused to metal FPD with modified palatal loop connector to achieve an optimal esthetic and functional correction for patient with missing maxillary central incisor along with spacing in the maxillary anterior region. [1],[2]

 Case Report

A 48-year-old male patient reported to the Department of Prosthodontics with a chief complaint of replacement of missing right maxillary central incisor [Figure 1]. The edentulous area was wide mesiodistally, and there was spacing between existing anterior teeth [Figure 2]. Radiographic examination reveals the less amount of bone available in right maxillary central incisor area. The treatment options include implant supported prosthesis or FPD with the aid of loop connector and resin bonded FPD. Considering his availability of bone and esthetic requirement of maintaining space between maxillary anterior teeth, the treatment option of three unit of porcelin fused to metal FPD from right maxillary lateral incisor to left maxillary centeral incisor with intermittent loop connector was considered.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

 Clinical Procedure

The proposed treatment plan was discussed with patient and following clinical procedure were carried out for his oral rehabilitation, teeth preparation for porcelain fused to metal prosthesis was carried out on right maxillary lateral incisor and left maxillary central incisor with equigingival margins and shoulder finish line in order to enhance the esthetics [Figure 1]. The gingival retraction was carried out with gingival retraction cord, and final impressions were made using elastomeric impression material with two stage double mix technique. An interocclusal record was made using bite registration material. Provisional restorations were fabricated with a tooth colored auto polymerizing acrylic resin and cemented with noneugenol temporary cement. The impression was poured in type IV dental stone. Wax patterns were fabricated using blue inlay wax. Wax spacer was adapted on the palate and hence that adequate space will be given in the area of loop connectors for the maintenance of oral hygiene. The wax patterns were invested with phosphate-bonded investment material and cast in base metal alloy [Figure 2]. After confirming the metal try in [Figure 3], the ceramic build-up was done [Figure 4]. Bisque trial was done. Loop connectors were highly polished to the high shine [Figure 4]. Final fixed dental prosthesis with loop connectors was luted using glass ionomer cement [Figure 5], [Figure 6]. The patient was instructed to maintain proper oral hygiene. Use of dental floss and interdental brush were recommended. The patient was evaluated after 1-week to assess the oral hygiene status.{Figure 3}{Figure 4}{Figure 5}{Figure 6}


Connectors are the part of FPD that connect between retainer and pontic. They may be either rigid or nonrigid. Conventional FPD connectors are more rigid as compared to loop connectors. [3] Loop connectors become more flexible, and its flexibility depends upon its lengths, diameter and its cross Indications for loop connector:

Patient wishes to maintain the diastemaPresence of the excessive pontic spaceMultiple joined prosthetic restorations in clinical situations with presence of localized or generalized spacing between abutmentsProsthetic restorations for pathologically migrated and peridontally weak teeth. [4]

Patient with missing central incisor along with diastema have limited treatment option. Closing the space (diastema) with conventional FPD without considering golden proportion would fail to create an esthetically pleasing appearance and detrimental effects on the periodontium. [5],[6] The modified FPD with loop connectors enhances the natural appearance of the restoration, maintain the diastema, proper emergence profile and preserve the remaining tooth structure of abutment teeth. [7]

Disadvantages of loop connectors include additional laboratory procedures, difficult to maintain oral hygiene, interference in tongue movement and discomfort in speech. However keeping the connectors round and small in size will not affect the phonetics. [8]


Treatment planning is crucial to the success when considering any form of tooth replacement. Whichever treatment modality is finally selected, it should suit the needs of the patient. This clinical report describes the use of loop connector for replacing missing central incisor with existing diastema. Loop connectors maintain proper emergence profile and enhance esthetic.


1Kalra A, Gowda ME, Verma K. Aesthetic rehabilitation with multiple loop connectors. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:112-5.
2Dr. Ravikumar Akulwar, Dr. Susheen Gajare, DR. Shivkumar Mule, DR. Ashwin Kodgi. Oral Rehabilitation with Multiple Loop Connectors: A Case Report. Indian Journal of Applied Research 2014;4:512-4.
3Rosensteil SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 3 rd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosbay; 2001. p. 710.
4Bhadari U, Bakshi S. Survival and complications of unconventional fixed dental prosthesis for maintain diastema and splint pathologically migrated teeth: A case series up to 8 years follow-up. Indian J Dent Res 2013;24:375-80.
5Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:244-52.
6Balkaya MC, Gur H, Pamuk S. The use of a resin-bonded prosthesis while maintaining the diastemata: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:507-10.
7Menezes N, Chitre V, Singh RK, Aras M. Maintaining diastema in a fixed partial denture: A case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2003;3:8-10.
8Plengsombut K, Brewer JD, Monaco EA Jr, Davis EL. Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:166-73.